1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. No. 256 (2010): Regular issue
  4. Archival article

Grain quality of spring wheat cultivated in monoculture depending on the conservation tillage variants and catch crops

Piotr Kraska

piotr.kraska@up.lublin.pl
Katedra Ekologii Rolniczej, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie (Poland)


Abstract

The studies were carried out in the years 2006–2008, using the experiment set up in 2005. The design of a static two-factor experiment, established using the split-plot method in four replications, included two tillage systems: plough tillage and conservation tillage performed using two methods — disk harrowing of the catch crops in autumn followed by leaving the catch crop biomass for winter as mulch, and disk harrowing in spring. Another experimental factor were four methods of regeneration of the monoculture stand of spring wheat by using the following catch crops: Trifolium pratense L. — undersown crop, Lolium multiflorum Lam. var. westerwoldicum Wittm. — undersown crop, Phacelia tanacetifolia Benth. — stubble crop, Sinapis alba L. — stubble crop, as well as a control treatment without catch crops. In the spring wheat grain, total protein content, wet gluten content, dry gluten content and the gluten index were determined. Moreover, the alpha-amylase activity was determined using the falling number method. Total protein content was higher in grain produced by spring wheat plants grown in the plots with conservation tillage treatments using spring disking of the catch crops and in those with plough tillage treatment than in the plots with conservation tillage treatment including autumn disking of the catch crops. It was higher in grain obtained in the treatments comprising red clover and Westerwolds ryegrass undersown crops and in those with a stubble crop of lacy phacelia than in the control treatment. The lowest total protein content of grain was recorded for the treatment with the white mustard stubble crop. Test weight and wet gluten content gave higher values for grain produced in the plots with plough tillage than for grain produced at any of the conservation tillage treatments. Dry gluten content of grain obtained in the plots where plough tillage was applied was higher than that of grain produced using the conservation treatment including autumn disking of the catch crops. Gluten index values also depended on the tillage treatment and were lower for grain obtained at plough tillage than for grain produced using any of the conservation tillage treatments. The highest falling number was recorded with the conservation tillage treatment including spring disking of the catch crops. The content of wet or dry gluten appeared to be the lowest in grain obtained in the treatment with Westerwolds ryegrass, whereas the plots with lacy phacelia were characterized by the lowest gluten indices. The highest falling number was recorded with the treatments with red clover.


Keywords:

catch crop, falling number, gluten, spring wheat, tillage system, total protein

Achremowicz B., Borkowska H., Styk B., Grundas S. 1995. Wpływ nawożenia azotowego na jakość glutenu pszenicy jarej. Biul. IHAR 193: 29 — 34.
Google Scholar

Borkowska H., Grundas S., Styk B. 2002. Wysokość i jakość plonów niektórych odmian pszenicy jarej w zależności od nawożenia azotowego. Annales UMCS, Sec. E, 57: 99 — 103.
Google Scholar

Blecharczyk A., Skrzypczak G., Małecka I. 1999. Reakcja pszenicy ozimej na przedplon i siew bezpośredni. Pam. Puł. 118: 9 — 16.
Google Scholar

Cacak-Pietrzak G. 2008. Wykorzystanie pszenicy w różnych gałęziach przemysłu spożywczego — wymagania technologiczne. Przegl. Zbożowo-Młynarski 11: 11 — 13.
Google Scholar

Cacak-Pietrzak G., Ceglińska A., Haber T. 1999. Cechy fizyko-chemiczne ziarna wybranych krajowych odmian pszenicy. Pam. Puł. 118: 35 — 43.
Google Scholar

Chrzanowska-Drożdż B., Jasińska Z., Gil Z. 1999. Ocena jakościowa ziarna pszenicy jarej w siewach czystych i mieszaninach odmian. Pam. Puł. 118: 67 — 75.
Google Scholar

Garwacka A., Starczewski J., Czarnocki Sz. 2007. Technologia uprawy a jakość ziarna wybranych odmian pszenicy jarej. Fragm. Agron. 2: 96 — 101.
Google Scholar

Goodling M.J., Smith G.P. 1998. The potential to use climate, variety and nitrogen relationships to optimise wheat quality. In: Short Communications, Fifth ESA Congress, 28 June — 2 July: 229 — 230.
Google Scholar

Grundas S. 1993. Wheat. In: Encyclopedia of Food Science. Food technology and nutrition. Academic Press Inc., London: 4875 — 4881.
Google Scholar

Hucl P., Chibbar R.N. 1996. Variation for starch concentration in spring wheat and its repeatability relative to protein concentration. Cereal Chem. 73, 6: 756 — 758.
Google Scholar

Klockiewicz-Kamińska E., Brzeziński W.J. 1997. Metoda oceny i klasyfikacji jakościowej odmian. 67, Zeszyty COBORU — Wiadomości Odmianoznawcze, Słupia Wielka: 3 — 18.
Google Scholar

Kraska P., Pałys E. 2005. Wpływ poziomów nawożenia mineralnego i ochrony chemicznej oraz systemów uprawy roli na zawartość i plon białka ogólnego w ziarnie jęczmienia jarego i żyta ozimego. Progress in Plant Protection / Postępy w Ochronie Roślin 45 (2): 810 — 812.
Google Scholar

López-Bellido L., Fuentes M., Castillo J.E., López-Garrido F.J. 1998. Effects of tillage, crop rotation and nitrogen fertilization on wheat-grain quality grown under rainfed Mediterranean conditions. Field Crop Res. 57 (3): 265 — 276.
Google Scholar

Małecka I., Blecharczyk A. 2004. Wpływ systemów uprawy roli na jakość ziarna pszenicy ozimej. Pam. Puł., 135: 181 — 187.
Google Scholar

Nowak W., Zbroszczyk T., Kotowicz L. 2004. Wpływ intensywności uprawy na niektóre cechy jakościowe ziarna odmian pszenicy. Pam. Puł. 135: 199 — 212.
Google Scholar

Peltonen J. Virtanen A. 1994. Effect of nitrogen fertilizers differing in release characteristics on the quantity of storage proteins in wheat. Cereal Chem. 71, 1: 1 — 5.
Google Scholar

Podolska G., Sułek A. 2002. Główne elementy technologii produkcji decydujące o wysokiej jakości ziarna pszenicy. Pam. Puł. 130/II: 597 — 605.
Google Scholar

Podolska G., Sułek A. 2003. Jakość ziarna pszenicy w Polsce i UE. Pam. Puł. 132: 363 — 369.
Google Scholar

Radomski Cz. 1987. Agrometeorologia. PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Rothkaehl J. 2004. Możliwości doboru odmian pszenicy zgodnie z zapotrzebowaniem na odpowiednią jakość mąki dla zakładów piekarskich. Przegl. Zbożowo-Młynarski, 12: 23 — 25.
Google Scholar

Rothkaehl J. 2007. Ocena podstawowych cech technologicznych ziarna pszenicy ze zbiorów 2006 roku. Przegl. Zboż. Młyn. 1: 4 — 9.
Google Scholar

Rothkaehl J. 2008. Ocena podstawowych cech technologicznych ziarna pszenicy ze zbiorów 2007 roku. Przegl. Zboż. Młyn. 1: 2 — 7.
Google Scholar

Rothkaehl J. 2009. Ocena podstawowych cech technologicznych ziarna pszenicy ze zbiorów 2008 roku. Przegl. Zboż. Młyn. 1: 2 — 5.
Google Scholar

Rothkaehl J., Abramczyk D. 2007. Wartość technologiczna odmian pszenicy uprawianych w Polsce. Przegl. Zbożowo-Młynarski 8: 2 — 4.
Google Scholar

Rothkaehl J., Filipiak K., Podolska G. 2004. Jakość ziarna pszenicy w zależności od rejonu uprawy. Pam. Puł., 135: 268 — 277.
Google Scholar

Sadowska J., Błaszczak T., Jeliński T., Fornal J., Borkowska H., Styk B. 2001. Fertilization and technological quality of wheat grain. Int. Agrophysics 15: 279 — 285.
Google Scholar

Scheromm P., Martin G., Bergoin A., Autran J.-C. 1992. Influence of nitrogen fertilization on the potential bread-baking quality of two wheat cultivars differing in their response to increasing nitrogen supplies. Cereal Chem. 96, 6: 664 — 670.
Google Scholar

Subda H. 1992. Assessment of chemical composition of flour and its effect on baking characteristics of wheat. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 1/42, 2: 15 — 21.
Google Scholar

Tendziagolska E., Parylak D. 2004. Zabiegi regeneracyjne w monokulturze pszenżyta ozimego a jakość ziarna. Pam. Puł. 135: 317 — 324.
Google Scholar

Woźniak A. 2004a. Wpływ przedplonu na wybrane cechy jakościowe ziarna pszenicy jarej. Pam. Puł. 135: 325 — 330.
Google Scholar

Woźniak A. 2004 b. The yield and quality of grain of spring wheat in different crop rotations. Zesz. Nauk. Akademii Roln. we Wrocławiu, Rolnictwo 85, 487: 219 — 227.
Google Scholar

Woźniak A. 2009. Jakość ziarna pszenicy jarej odmiany Koksa w różnych systemach uprawy roli. Acta Agrophysica 14(1): 223 — 241.
Google Scholar

Woźniak A., Gontarz D., Staniszewski M., Gos M. 2006. Plonowanie i jakość ziarna pszenicy jarej uprawianej w zmianowaniach o różnym jej udziale. Biul. IHAR 242: 45 — 55.
Google Scholar

Żmijewski M., Subda H., Korczak B., Kowalska M., Karolini-Skaradzińska Z., Czubaszek A. 1999. Skład chemiczny i wartość wypiekowa ziarna oraz mąki odmian pszenicy jarej. Część I. Skład chemiczny. Biul. IHAR 212: 65 — 70.
Google Scholar

Download


Published
2010-06-30

Cited by

Kraska, P. (2010) “Grain quality of spring wheat cultivated in monoculture depending on the conservation tillage variants and catch crops”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (256), pp. 55–71. doi: 10.37317/biul-2010-0031.

Authors

Piotr Kraska 
piotr.kraska@up.lublin.pl
Katedra Ekologii Rolniczej, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 31
PDF downloads: 31


License

Copyright (c) 2010 Piotr Kraska

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.





Girl in a jacket

Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin

Radzików, 05-870 Błonie,
tel. tel. 22 725 36 11, 733 45 00,
e-mail: postbox@ihar.edu.pl

Copyright

Copyright 2019 by Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin
OJS Support and Customization by LIBCOM
Platform & workfow by OJS/PKP