Characteristics and empirical comparison of simple and complex path analysis in grain yield determination by yield - related traits. Part I. Presentation of methods
Dariusz Gozdowski
dariusz_gozdowski@sggw.edu.plKatedra Doświadczalnictwa i Bioinformatyki, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie (Poland)
Wiesław Mądry
Katedra Doświadczalnictwa i Bioinformatyki, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie (Poland)
Abstract
Evaluation of determination of crop yield by yield-related traits is important in determining both the traits having influence on the yield variability and suitable criteria for breeding of high-yielding genotypes. This paper shows the basis of classical path analysis (established by S. Wright) as well as possibilities and examples of its using to evaluate determination of variability of yield by yield-related traits, that may have direct or indirect effects on crop yielding. The approaches including simple and complex (multilevel) path analysis, in which the yield is determined by different yield-related traits, are presented. Besides the classic path analysis, another methods being the modifications of this analysis, are shortly described.
Keywords:
path analysis, yield-related traits, yield componentsReferences
Acreche M., Slafer G. 2006. Grain weight response to increases in number of grains in wheat in a Mediterranean area, Field Crops Research 98: 52–59
Google Scholar
Agrama H. , Zakaria A., Said F., Tuinstra M. 1999. Identification of quantitative trait loci for nitrogen use efficiency in maize. Molecular Breeding, 5 (2): 187 — 195.
Google Scholar
Ahmed H., Khan, B., Khan S., Kissana N., Laghari S. 2003 . Path coefficient analysis in bread wheat, Asian J. Plant Sci., 2 (6): 491 — 494.
Google Scholar
Ali N., Javidfar F., Elmira Y., Mirza Y. 2003. Relationship among yield components and selection criteria for yield improvement in winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Pak. J. Bot., 35 (2): 167 — 174.
Google Scholar
Annicchiarico P., Pecetti L. 1998. Yield vs. morphophysiological trait-based criteria for selection of durum wheat in a semi-arid Mediterranean region (northern Syria). Field Crop Res. 59, (3): 163 — 173.
Google Scholar
Balkema-Boomstra A. 1992 . The relation between grain yield and some related traits of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and their usefulness in a breeding program. Euphytica 65 (2): 99 — 106.
Google Scholar
Ball R., McNew R., Vories E., Keisling T., Purcell L. 2001. Path analyses of population density effects on short-season soybean yield. Agron. J. 93: 187 — 195.
Google Scholar
Bhargava A., Shukla S., Ohri D. 2007. Genetic variability and interrelationship among various morphological and quality traits in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Field Crops Research 101: 104–116.
Google Scholar
Board J., Kang M. S., Harville B. 1999. Path analyses of the yield formation process for late-planted soybean. Agron. J., 91: 128 — 135.
Google Scholar
Board, J. , Kang, M. S., Bodrero, M. L. 2003. Yield components as indirect selection criteria for late-planted soybean cultivars. Agron. J. 95: 420 — 429.
Google Scholar
Budzyński W., Jankowski K., Szempliński W. 2003. Cultivar-related and agronomic conditions of rye yielding on good rye soil suitability complex part I. Yield and its relationship with the yield components. Vol. 6, issue 1, Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities, ser. Agronomy.
Google Scholar
Dofing M., Knight W. 1992. Alternative model for path analysis of small-grain yield. Crop Sci. 32: 487 — 489.
Google Scholar
Eaton G. W., Bowen P. A., Jolliffe P. A. 1986. Two-dimensional Partitioning of Yield Variation. HortScience 21: 1052 — 1053.
Google Scholar
Garcia del Moral L., Ramos M., Garcia del Moral B., Jimenez-Tejada P. 199 . Ontogenic approach to grain production in spring barley based on path-coefficient analysis. Crop Sci. 31: 1179 — 1185.
Google Scholar
Garcia del Moral L., Rharrabti Y., Elhani S., Martos V., Royo C. 2005. Yield formation in Mediterranean durum wheat’s under two contrasting water regimes based on path-coefficient analysis. Euphytica 146: 203 — 212.
Google Scholar
Garcia del Moral L., Rharrabti Y., Villegas D., Royo C. 2003. Evaluation of grain yield components in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions: an ontogenic approach. Agron. J. 95: 266 — 274.
Google Scholar
Gołaszewski J. 1996. A Method of Yield Component Analysis. Biometrical Letters 33 (2): 79 — 88.
Google Scholar
Gołaszewski J., Idźkowska M. Milewska, J. 1998. The TDP Method of Seed Yield Component Analysis in Grain Legume Breeding. J. Appl. Genet. 39 (4): 299 — 308.
Google Scholar
Gołaszewski J., Idźkowska M., Milewska J., Koczowska I. 2001. Yield component analysis with SYCA and TDP in Fodder Pea. Plant Breed. Seed Sci. 45 (2): 77 — 85.
Google Scholar
Iannucci A., Martiniello P. 1998. Analysis of seed yield components in four Mediterranean annual clovers. Field Crop Res., 55, 235 — 243.
Google Scholar
Jöreskog K. 1970. A general method for analysis of covariance structures. Biometrics 57: 239 — 251.
Google Scholar
Keesling J. 1972. Maximum likelihood approaches to causal analysis. Chicago, Department of Education, University of Chicago.
Google Scholar
Klepper, B., Rickman, R., Waldman, S., Chevalier, P. 1998. The physiological life cycle of wheat: Its use in breeding and crop management. Euphytica 100: 341 — 347.
Google Scholar
Kozak M. 2006. Two-dimensional partitioning of yield variation: a critical note. Plant Breed. Seed Sci. 53: 37 — 42.
Google Scholar
Kozak M., Singh P. K., Verma, M. R., Hore, D. K. 2007. Causal mechanism for determination of grain yield and milling quality of lowland rice. Field Crops Research 102: 178 — 184.
Google Scholar
Kozak M., Kang M.S. 2006 . Note on modern path analysis in application to crop science. Commun. Biometry Crop Sci. 1 (1): 32 — 34.
Google Scholar
Kozak, M., Mądry, W. 2006. Note on yield component analysis. Cereal Research Communications 34 (2–3): 933 — 940 .
Google Scholar
Maddox D., Antonovics J. 1983 . Experimental ecological genetics in Plantago: a structural equation approach to fitness components in P. aristata and P. patagonica. Ecology, 64 (5): 1092 — 1099.
Google Scholar
Maman N., Mason S., Lyon D., Dhunganga P. 2004. Yield components of peral millet and grain sorghum across environments in the central great plains. Crop Sci. 44: 2138 — 2145.
Google Scholar
Mohammadi S., Prasanna B., Singh N. 2003 . Sequential path model for determining interrelationships among grain yield and related characters in maize. Crop Sci. 43: 1690 — 1697.
Google Scholar
Mitchell R. J. 1992 . Testing evolutionary and ecological hypotheses using path analysis and structural equation modeling, Functional Ecology, 6 (2): 123 — 129.
Google Scholar
Moragues M., Garcia del Moral L., Moralejo M., Royo C. 2006 . Yield formation strategies of durum wheat landraces with distinct pattern of dispersal within the Mediterranean basin. I. Yield components. Field Crops Res. 95: 194 — 205.
Google Scholar
Oktaba W. 1986. Metody statystyki matematycznej w doświadczalnictwie. PWN Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Okuyama L., Federizzi L., Barbosa Neto J. 2005 . Plant traits to complement selection based on yield components in wheat. Ciência Rural, 35, 5: 1010 — 1018.
Google Scholar
Rozbicki J. 1997: Agrotechniczne uwarunkowania wzrostu, rozwoju i plonowania pszenżyta ozimego. Fundacja "Rozwój SGGW".
Google Scholar
Samonte S., Wilson L., McClung A. 1998. Path analyses of yield and yield-related traits of fifteen diverse rice genotypes. Crop Sci., 38: 1130 — 1136.
Google Scholar
Samonte S., Wilson L., Tabien R. 2005 . Maximum node production rate and main culm node number contributions to yield and yield-related traits in rice. Field Crops Research 96, 313 — 319.
Google Scholar
Shahinnia F., Rezai M., Sayed Tabatabaei E. 2005 . Variation and path analysis of important agronomic traits in two- and six-rowed recombinant inbred lines in barley (Hordeum vulgare L. . Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 41: 246 — 250.
Google Scholar
Shipley B. 2002. Cause and correlation in biology. A user’s guide to path analysis, structural equations and causal inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
Sinebo W. 2002. Yield relationships of barleys grown in a tropical highland environment. Crop Sci., 42: 428 — 437.
Google Scholar
Slafer G. 2003. Genetic basis of yield as viewed from a crop physiologist’s perspective. Ann. Appl. Biol. , 142: 117 — 128.
Google Scholar
Soenarto 2001. Morphological components of yield in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.). Praca doktorska, University of British Columbia, Kanada.
Google Scholar
Spaner D., Todd A., McKenzie B. 2001 . The effect of seeding rate and nitrogen fertilization on barley yield and yield components in a cool maritime climate. J. Agronomy & Crop Science 187: 105 — 110.
Google Scholar
Szafrański W., Kulig B. 1998. Metoda współczynników ścieżek w ocenie współzależności cech determinujących plon ziarna jęczmienia jarego. Zesz. Nauk. AR Kraków ser. Rolnictwo, 35: 93 — 101.
Google Scholar
Szempliński W. 2003. Siedliskowe i agrotechniczne uwarunkowania produkcji ziarna jęczmienia jarego na paszę w północno-wschodniej Polsce. UWM Olsztyn: 7 — 87.
Google Scholar
Tarimo A. 1997 . Physiological response of groundnut to plant population density. African Crop Science Journal 5 (3): 267 — 272.
Google Scholar
Wright S. 1921. Correlation and causation. J. Agric. Res. 20: 557 — 585.
Google Scholar
Wright S. 1923. The theory of path coefficients – a reply to Niles’s criticism. Genetics 8: 239 — 255.
Google Scholar
Wright S. 1934. The method of path coefficients. Ann. Math. Statist. 5: 161 — 215.
Google Scholar
Zając T., Krawontka J., Szmigiel A. 1997. Oszacowanie determinacji plonu ziarna jęczmienia jarego na podstawie predykcji regresyjnej i zmienności elementów struktury plonu. Zesz. Nauk. AR Kraków ser. Rolnictwo, 34: 141 — 151.
Google Scholar
Authors
Dariusz Gozdowskidariusz_gozdowski@sggw.edu.pl
Katedra Doświadczalnictwa i Bioinformatyki, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie Poland
Authors
Wiesław MądryKatedra Doświadczalnictwa i Bioinformatyki, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie Poland
Statistics
Abstract views: 293PDF downloads: 25
License
Copyright (c) 2008 Dariusz Gozdowski, Wiesław Mądry
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:
- Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
- Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
- Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
- Including the article in a collective work.
- Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
- Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
- Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.
Authors by sending a request for publication:
- They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
- They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
- They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
- They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
- They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Marzena Iwańska, Wiesław Mądry, Anna Rajfura, Tadeusz Drzazga, Comparison of some indices for evaluating wide adaptation degree of cultivars on the basis of data from pre-registration trials with winter wheat , Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: No. 253 (2009): Regular issue