Characteristics and empirical comparison of simple and complex path analysis in grain yield determination by yield - related traits. Part II. Example on spring barley

Dariusz Gozdowski

dariusz_gozdowski@sggw.edu.pl
Katedra Doświadczalnictwa i Bioinformatyki, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie (Poland)

Wiesław Mądry


Katedra Doświadczalnictwa i Bioinformatyki, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie (Poland)

Zdzisław Wyszyński


Katedra Agronomii, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie (Poland)

Maria Kalinowska-Zdun


Katedra Agronomii, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie (Poland)

Abstract

Evaluation of determination of cereals yield is important for determining, which yield-related traits influence yield variability, and what criteria should be taken in breeding of high-yielding genotypes. This paper shows the determination of spring barley yield by some yield-related traits. The analyses were conducted using two approaches: simple paths, in which we assume that all traits have direct effects on grain yield, and complex paths, where yield-related traits were divided into primary yield-related traits (which have direct influence on yield) and secondary yield-related traits. The obtained results proved that the approach with simple casual model should not be used when yield-related traits formed at different developmental stages are correlated. Using the simple path analysis the effects of tillering and of a number of plants were not proved, although these traits certainly have significant influence on yield variability. The approach with complex paths appeared to be more useful as it relates to the ontogenetic sequence of forming of particular yield-related traits.


Keywords:

path analysis, yield-related traits, yield components

Board J. ,Kang, M. S., Bodrero M. L. 2003. Yield components as indirect selection criteria for late-planted soybean cultivars. Agron. J. 95: 420 — 429.
Google Scholar

Dofing M., Knight W. 1992. Alternative model for path analysis of small-grain yield. Crop Sci. 32: 487 — 489.
Google Scholar

Garcia del Moral L., Rharrabti Y., Elhani S., Martos V., Royo C. 2005. Yield formation in Mediterranean durum wheat’s under two contrasting water regimes based on path-coefficient analysis. Euphytica 146: 203 — 212.
Google Scholar

Gozdowski D., Mądry W. 2008. Charakterystyka i empiryczne porównanie prostej oraz złożonej analizy ścieżek w ocenie determinacji plonu roślin przez ich cechy plonotwórcze. Cz. I Prezentacja stosowanych metod. Biul. IHAR (złożone)
Google Scholar

Klepper B., Rickman R., Waldman S., Chevalier, P. 1998. The physiological life cycle of wheat: Its use in breeding and crop management. Euphytica 100: 341 — 347.
Google Scholar

Kozak M., Mądry W. 2006. Note on yield component analysis. Cereal Research Communications 34 (2-3): 933 — 940.
Google Scholar

Moragues M., Garcia del Moral L., Moralejo M., Royo C. 2006. Yield formation strategies of durum wheat landraces with distinct pattern of dispersal within the Mediterranean basin I: Yield components. Field Crops Res. 95: 194 — 205.
Google Scholar

Samonte S., Wilson L., McClung A. 1998. Path analyses of yield and yield-related traits of fifteen diverse rice genotypes. Crop Sci., 38: 1130 — 1136.
Google Scholar

Seker H., Serin Y. 2004. Explanation of relationship between seed yield and some morphological traits in smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leys.) by path analysis. European Journal of Agronomy 21: 1 — 6
Google Scholar

Sinebo W. 2002. Yield relationships of barleys grown in a tropical highland environment. Crop Sci. 42: 428 — 437.
Google Scholar

Slafer G. 2003: Genetic basis of yield as viewed from a crop physiologist’s perspective. Ann. Appl. Biol. , 142: 117 — 128.
Google Scholar

Wright S. 1921. Correlation and causation. J. Agric. Res., 20: 557 — 585.
Google Scholar

Wu Y., Taliaferro C., Martin D., Goad C., Anderson J. 2006. Genetic variability and relationships for seed yield and its components in Chinese Cynodon accesions. Field Crops Research 98: 245 — 252.
Google Scholar


Published
2008-09-30

Cited by

Gozdowski, D. (2008) “Characteristics and empirical comparison of simple and complex path analysis in grain yield determination by yield - related traits. Part II. Example on spring barley”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (249), pp. 125–132. doi: 10.37317/biul-2008-0039.

Authors

Dariusz Gozdowski 
dariusz_gozdowski@sggw.edu.pl
Katedra Doświadczalnictwa i Bioinformatyki, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie Poland

Authors

Wiesław Mądry 

Katedra Doświadczalnictwa i Bioinformatyki, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie Poland

Authors

Zdzisław Wyszyński 

Katedra Agronomii, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie Poland

Authors

Maria Kalinowska-Zdun 

Katedra Agronomii, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 85
PDF downloads: 14


License

Copyright (c) 2008 Dariusz Gozdowski, Wiesław Mądry, Zdzisław Wyszyński, Maria Kalinowska-Zdun

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.