Fertilizing effect of farmyard manure and undersown cover crops on sugar beet

Part III. Concentration of dry matter and macroelements in biomass of sugar beet

Danuta Buraczyńska

wsp@uws.edu.pl
Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Podlaska w Siedlcach (Poland)

Abstract

The field experiment was carried out in 1993–1995 at the Agricultural Experimental Station in Zawady on the soil of strong grain-pasture complex using the split-block method. The effects of the mass of overploughed cover crop (post-harvest residue, whole biomass) and the form of organic fertilization (control without organic fertilization, farmyard manure, undersown cover crops: red clover, black medic, Italian ryegrass and red clover + Italian ryegrass, black medic + Italian ryegrass) on concentration of dry matter and macroelements in roots and leaves of sugar beet were evaluated. The influence of farmyard manure with undersown cover crop on concentration of dry matter and macroelements in sugar beet was also compared. Fertilization of the soil using the whole biomass as compared with post-harvest residue alone caused essential decrease of the quantity of dry mass in roots and leaves. Moreover essential increase of concentration of total nitrogen and potassium in roots and leaves and of calcium in leaves of sugar beet was observed. Irrespective of the amount of over ploughed cover crop the applied forms of organic fertilizers increased in most cases the concentration of dry matter, total nitrogen, potassium, calcium and sodium in sugar beet roots and leaves and that of phosphorus in roots, as well as the magnesium content of leaves. The effects the post-harvest residue and the whole biomass of undersown cover crop, as compared with those of farmyard manure, on concentration of dry mass, total nitrogen and potassium in roots and leaves as well as on the concentration of calcium, magnesium and sodium in leaves could differ significantly.

Supporting Agencies

The work was carried out as part of research project no. 5 PO6B 014 09 financed by the State Committee for Scientific Research

Keywords:

content, dry matter, farmyard manure, macroelements, sugar beet, undersown cover crop

Ceglarek F., Buraczyńska D. 2002. Działanie nawozowe obornika i międzyplonów wsiewek stosowanych pod burak cukrowy. Cz. I. Wschody, obsada i plony buraka cukrowego. Biul. IHAR 222: 247 — 254.
Google Scholar

Ceglarek F., Gąsiorowska B., Zarzecka K. 1995. Plonowanie i wartość technologiczna buraka cukrowego w zależności od zróżnicowanego nawożenia organicznego i nawożenia mineralnego. Zesz. Nauk. WSRP Siedlce 39: 57 — 71.
Google Scholar

Duer I., Jończyk K. 1998. Nawożenie pod ziemniak uprawiany w gospodarstwach ekologicznych. Fragm. Agron. 1 (57): 85 — 95.
Google Scholar

Gutmański I. 1992. Działanie wapna, obornika i terminu zbioru na efektywność dawek azotu stosowanych pod buraki cukrowe. Cz. II. Zawartość składników pokarmowych w siewkach i liściach buraka cukrowego. Biul. IHAR 184: 105 — 118.
Google Scholar

Gutmański I. 1996. Niskonakładowa technologia produkcji buraka cukrowego. Praca zbiorowa. IHAR Bydgoszcz.
Google Scholar

Johnen B. 1974. Bildung, Menge und Umsetzung von Pflanzenwűrzel im Boden. Diss., Bonn.
Google Scholar

Kopczyński J. 1986. Wpływ nawozu zielonego z poplonu żyta ozimego i rzepaku na plonowanie oraz zmiany niektórych cech jakości buraka cukrowego. Rozprawy, AR Szczecin, 101.
Google Scholar

Mazur T., Koc J. 1982. Wpływ nawożenia mineralnego i organicznego stosowanego w zmianowaniu na plon roślin i ich skład chemiczny. Zesz. Nauk. ART Olsztyn, Rol. 34: 119 — 133.
Google Scholar

Miczyński J., Siwicki S. 1962. Międzyplony nawozowe w uprawie buraka cukrowego. Cz. III. Różne poplony ścierniskowe i ich działanie następcze. Rocz. Nauk Rol., Ser. A, 87, 1, 63 — 89: 1962.
Google Scholar

Nowakowski M., Gutmański I., Szymczak-Nowak J., Kostka-Gościniak D., Banaszak H. 1996. Wpływ nawożenia obornikiem, słomą oraz roślinami poplonowymi na plon i zdrowotność buraka cukrowego przy zróżnicowanej koncentracji jego uprawy w płodozmianie. Zesz. Nauk. AR Szczecin 172, Rol. 62: 429 — 435.
Google Scholar

Słowiński H., Prośba-Białczyk U., Pytlarz-Kozicka M., Nowak W. 1995. Wpływ nawożenia na dynamikę pobierania składników mineralnych przez buraka cukrowego. Zesz. Nauk. AR Wrocław 262, Rol. LXIII: 31 — 43.
Google Scholar

Słowiński H., Prośba-Białczyk U., Pytlarz-Kozicka M., Nowak W. 1997. Wpływ nawożenia organicznego i mineralnego na zawartość makroskładników i cukru w buraku cukrowym. Biul. IHAR 202: 149 — 157.
Google Scholar

Songin W. 1992. Nawożenie organiczne w alternatywnych systemach rolnictwa. Mat. Konf. Nauk. "Nawozy organiczne", AR Szczecin, z. 2: 169 — 177.
Google Scholar

Stępień A., Adamiak J., Adamiak E. 1997. Ekologiczne nawożenie buraka cukrowego a jakość plonów. Mat. Konf. Nauk. "Postęp w uprawie buraka cukrowego i jakości korzeni", SGGW Warszawa: 132 — 133.
Google Scholar


Published
2003-09-30

Cited by

Buraczyńska, D. (2003) “Fertilizing effect of farmyard manure and undersown cover crops on sugar beet: Part III. Concentration of dry matter and macroelements in biomass of sugar beet”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (228), pp. 305–313. doi: 10.37317/biul-2003-0114.

Authors

Danuta Buraczyńska 
wsp@uws.edu.pl
Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Podlaska w Siedlcach Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 76
PDF downloads: 42


License

Copyright (c) 2003 Danuta Buraczyńska

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.