Comparison of yielding and persistence of some grass species and varieties in different habitats
Maria Janicka
maria_janicka@sggw.edu.plKatedra Agronomii, Zakład Łąkarstwa SGGW, Warszawa (Poland)
Piotr Stypiński
Katedra Agronomii, Zakład Łąkarstwa SGGW, Warszawa (Poland)
Iveta Ilavska
Stanica pasienkov a horského poľnohospodárstva, Poprad, Slovensko (Slovenia)
Daniel Rataj
Stanica pasienkov a horského poľnohospodárstva, Poprad, Slovensko (Slovenia)
Abstract
The aim of the study was comparison of yielding and persistence of six Czech and one Polish grass varieties at different site and rates of nitrogen fertilization. The studies were carried out in pure stands in 1998–2000. The twin experiments were established in 1998 in two different sites: in Experimental Station at Jaktorów (Poland) and in Poprad-Matejovce (Slovakia). Seven varieties of four grass species were tested: three Czech Festulolium varieties: Bečva, Perun and Lofa, two Lolium multiflorum varieties: Polish Kroto and Czech Jiskra, the Mustang variety of Lolium perenne and the Lekora variety of Festuca arundinacea. Three doses of nitrogen fertilization 90, 150 and 210 kg/ha were applied. The Perun, Lofa, Mustang and Lekora varieties yielded better in Poprad-Matejovce than at Jaktorów. It is connected, first of all, with higher amount of rainfall in the vegetation periods and with its more favorable distribution; the differences due to the year of study varied between 10–30%. Irrespective of the locality, the highest yields for three years have given the Lekora variety of Festuca arundinacea and the Festulolium varieties Perun and Lofa. Site conditions in Poprad-Matejovce let to survive for more persistent species and varieties. Already after the first year of study the Lolium multiflorum varieties Kroto and Jiskra and the Festulolium variety Bečva disappeared. The nitrogen fertilization had a clear favorable effect on the yields of tested species and varieties but the differences between the yields on doses of 150 and 210 kg/ha were not significant.
Keywords:
Festulolium, Lolium multiflorum, Lolium perenne, nitrogen fertilization, varieties, yields, persistenceReferences
Borowiecki J. 1997. Przydatność Festulolium do uprawy w mieszankach z koniczyną czerwoną. Pam. Puł. 111: 21 — 33.
Google Scholar
Carnide V.P., do Valle Ribeiro M., Dias da Silva A. 1986. Behaviour of Festulolium hybrids under summer stress in north-east Portugal. Proc. of the 11th Gen. Meet. of Europ. Grassld. Fed., Troia, Portugal, 4–9 May.
Google Scholar
Domański P., Jokś W. 1999. Odmiany Festulolium — efekt postępu biologicznego. Zesz. Nauk. ATR Bydgoszcz, 220, Rolnictwo, 44: 87 — 94.
Google Scholar
Falkowski M., Kukułka I., Kozłowski S. 1985. Cechy jakościowe charakterystyczne Lolium multiflorum. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 293: 139 — 149.
Google Scholar
Fojtik A., Světlik V., Horák J., Černoch V. 1990. New varieties of Festulolium, Festuca arundinacea and Poa pratensis. Proc. of the 13th Gen. Meet. of Europ. Grassld. Fed., Banska Bystrica, Czechoslovakia: 459 — 461.
Google Scholar
Fojtik A. 1994. Methods of grass improvement used at the Plant Breeding Station Hladke Zivotice. Genet. Pol., 35A: 25 — 31.
Google Scholar
Janicka M., Stypiński P. 2001. Ocena cech morfologiczno-biologicznych trzech odmian Festulolium w warunkach zróżnicowanego nawożenia azotem. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 479: 133 — 141.
Google Scholar
Janicka M., Stypiński P., Ilavska I. 2001. Tempo wzrostu i rozwoju dwóch tetraploidalnych odmian Lolium multiflorum i jednej odmiany Lolium perenne. Pam. Puł. 125: 243 — 252.
Google Scholar
Kryszak J. 2001. Plonowanie i jakość mieszanki Festulolium braunii (K. Richter) A. Camus z koniczyną łąkową i lucerną siewną na gruntach ornych. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 479: 173 — 178.
Google Scholar
Kohoutek A. 1992. Production, quality and persistence of the Czechoslovak assortment of grasses and clover. Proc. of the 14th Gen. Meet. of Europ. Grassld. Fed., Lahti, Finland: 447 — 448.
Google Scholar
Łyszczarz R., Dembek R., Sikora J., Zimmer-Grajewska M. 1997. Zróżnicowanie cech użytkowych odmian Lolium perenne L., Lolium multiflorum Lam. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 451: 213 — 219.
Google Scholar
Morháč, J. Kašper, D. Rataj, A. Kohoutek. 1990. Maintenance of temporary grassland in different ecological conditions. Proc. of the 13th Gen. Meet. of Europ. Grassld. Fed., Banska Bystrica, Czechoslovakia: 395 — 399.
Google Scholar
Stypiński P. 1996. Optymalizacja nawożenia azotowego pastwisk na grądach. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol., 442: 405 — 416.
Google Scholar
Stypiński P., Janicka M., Rataj D. 2001. Wpływ zróżnicowanego nawożenia azotowego na plonowanie wybranych gatunków i odmian traw. Pam. Puł. 125: 13 — 20.
Google Scholar
Vinczeffy J. 1984. The effect of some ecological factors on grass yield. Proc. of the 10th Gen. Meet. of Europ. Grassld. Fed., Ås, Norway, 26–30 June: 76 — 79.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272503700030020
Google Scholar
Zwierzykowski Z., Jokś W., Naganowska B. 1993. Mieszańce amfitetraploidalne Festuca pratensis Huds. × Lolium multiflorum Lam. [= × Festulolium braunii (K. Richter) A. Camus]. Biul. IHAR 188: 61 — 69.
Google Scholar
Authors
Maria Janickamaria_janicka@sggw.edu.pl
Katedra Agronomii, Zakład Łąkarstwa SGGW, Warszawa Poland
Authors
Piotr StypińskiKatedra Agronomii, Zakład Łąkarstwa SGGW, Warszawa Poland
Authors
Iveta IlavskaStanica pasienkov a horského poľnohospodárstva, Poprad, Slovensko Slovenia
Authors
Daniel RatajStanica pasienkov a horského poľnohospodárstva, Poprad, Slovensko Slovenia
Statistics
Abstract views: 72PDF downloads: 28
License
Copyright (c) 2003 Maria Janicka, Piotr Stypiński, Iveta Ilavska, Daniel Rataj
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:
- Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
- Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
- Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
- Including the article in a collective work.
- Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
- Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
- Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.
Authors by sending a request for publication:
- They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
- They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
- They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
- They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
- They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.
