The response of sugar beet to nitrogen fertilizers in relation to potassium-sodium-magnesium fertilization

Witold Szczepaniak

agro@up.poznan.pl
Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu (Poland)

Witold Grzebisz


Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu (Poland)

Barbara Żuchlińska


Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu (Poland)

Abstract

An assessment of the effect of calcium saltpetre and ammonium saltpetre nitrogen fertilizers in relation to potassium fertilization applied alone or enriched with sodium and magnesium (two variants: KNaMg; KNa3Mg) on roots and sugar yields were conducted in 1999 and 2000 at Donatowo, Wielkopolska. Yields of root, sugar and technological quality of roots depended on interaction of both experimental factors, i.e. N and K-Na-Mg fertilizers. Sugar beet plant fertilized with calcium saltpetre and potassium chloride or ammonium saltpetre together with KNaMg fertilizer resulted in similar level of roots and sugar yields. The calcium saltpetre in comparison to ammonium saltpetre caused increase of sugar content and some molasses forming substances such as α-amino N and K as well. It was found that sugar yields from the combination fertilized with calcium saltpetre depended more on yields of roots, but fertilized with ammonium saltpetre on both yield of roots and sugar content.


Keywords:

nitrogen fertilizers, potassium-sodium-magnesium fertilizers, sugar beet, technological quality of roots, yields of root yield of sugar

Anonim 1995. Ein starkes Stück: Qualität von KWS. KWS, Einbeck: 31.
Google Scholar

Armstrong D. I. 1998. (ed.). Potassium for agriculture. Better Crops. 3: 40.
Google Scholar

Barłóg P., Grzebisz W. 2002. The influence of the kind of fertilizer and the method of division of nitrogen on the content and dynamics of micronutrient uptake by winter oilseed rape. In: Chemistry for Agriculture. Vol. 3. Chemical Products In: Agriculture and Environment: 195 — 198.
Google Scholar

Bell Ch., Milford G. F. J., Leigh R-A. 1996. Sugar beet. In: Photoassimilate Distribution in Plants and Crops. (Eds. E. Zamski and A. A. Schaffer) New York, Marcel Dekker Inc: 691 — 707.
Google Scholar

Dibb D. W. 2000. The mysteries (myths) of nutrient use efficiency. Better Crops 84, 3: 3 — 5.
Google Scholar

Draycott, A. P. 1996. Aspects of fertilizer use in modern, high-yield sugar beet culture. IPI- Bulletin 15, IPI, Basel/Switzerland: 52.
Google Scholar

Grzebisz W., Barłóg P., Feć M., 1998. The dynamics of nutrient uptake by sugar beet and its effect on dry matter and sugar yields. Bibliotheca Fragmenta Agronomica, 3/98: 242 — 248.
Google Scholar

Grzebisz W., Barłóg P. 2002. Zasady nawożenia. W: Nowoczesna uprawa buraków cukrowych. W. Grzebisz (red.). Wyd. AR Poznań: 62 — 85.
Google Scholar

Gutmański I. 2002. Znaczenie nawożenia potasem dla efektywnej uprawy buraka cukrowego. IPI, IHAR: 32.
Google Scholar

Haneklaus S., Knudsen L., Schnug E. 1998. Relationship between potassium and sodium in sugar beet. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 29 (11–14): 1793 — 1798. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629809370070
Google Scholar

Herlihy M., 1992. Effects of N, P and K on yield and quality of sugar beet. Irish J. of Agric. Food Res. 31: 35 — 49.
Google Scholar

Konys L., Wiśniewski P. 1991. Analiza ścieżkowa w układach przyczynowo-skutkowych. Roczniki AR w Poznaniu CLIII: 37 — 45.
Google Scholar

Marschner H., Schafarczyk W. 1967. Influx und Efflux von Natrium und Kalium bei Mais- und Zuckerrübenpflanzen. Zeitschrift für Pflanzeneahr. Bodenk. 118: 172 — 187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.19681180304
Google Scholar

Marschner H. 1993. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, London — Toronto.
Google Scholar

Marschner H., Kirkby E.A., Cackmak J. 1996. Effect of mineral nutritional status on shoot-root partitioning of photo-assimilates and cycling of mineral nutrients. J. Exp. Botany: 1255 — 1263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/47.Special_Issue.1255
Google Scholar

Milford G. F. J., Armstrong M. J., Jarvis P. J., Houghton B. J., Bellet-Travers D. M., Jones J., Leigh R. A. 2000. Effect of potassium fertilizer on the yield, quality and potassium offtake of sugar beet crops grown on soils of different potassium status. J. Agric. Sci. 135 (Part 1): 1 — 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859699007881
Google Scholar

Pocock T. O., Milford G. F. J., Armstrong M. J. 1990. Storage root quality in relation to nitrogen uptake. J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge 115: 355 — 362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600075791
Google Scholar

Pollach G., Hein W., Rösner G. 1996. Definition der inneren Qualität von Zuckerrüben. Zuckerind. 121, 5: 332 — 344.
Google Scholar

Rocznik Statystyczny. 2000, 2001.Wydawn. Statystyczne GUS, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Schiweck H., Burba M. 1993. Abschätzung der Alkalitätsreserven von Zuckerrüben aus der Ionenbilanz von Dicksäften. Zuckerind., 118: 241 — 246.
Google Scholar

Siódmiak J. 2002. Odmiany buraka cukrowego, ich ocena i wartość gospodarcza. W: Nowoczesna uprawa buraków cukrowych. W. Grzebisz (red.). Wyd. AR Poznań: 29 — 40.
Google Scholar


Published
2002-06-28

Cited by

Szczepaniak, W., Grzebisz, W. and Żuchlińska, B. (2002) “The response of sugar beet to nitrogen fertilizers in relation to potassium-sodium-magnesium fertilization”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (222), pp. 83–90. doi: 10.37317/biul-2002-0050.

Authors

Witold Szczepaniak 
agro@up.poznan.pl
Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu Poland

Authors

Witold Grzebisz 

Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu Poland

Authors

Barbara Żuchlińska 

Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 40
PDF downloads: 14


License

Copyright (c) 2025 Witold Szczepaniak, Witold Grzebisz, Barbara Żuchlińska

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>