Genetic distance among inbred lines of maize and its association with hybrid performance

Janusz Rogacki

smolice@hrsmolice.pl
HR Smolice Sp. z o.o. Gr. IHAR (Poland)

Zofia Bulińska-Radomska


Krajowe Centrum Roślinnych Zasobów Genowych, IHAR Radzików (Poland)

Jakub Dzienkiewicz


Krajowe Centrum Roślinnych Zasobów Genowych, IHAR Radzików (Poland)

Józef Adamaczyk


HR Smolice Sp. z o.o. Gr. IHAR (Poland)

Henryk Cygert


HR Smolice Sp. z o.o. Gr. IHAR (Poland)

Abstract

The main objective of the present study was to evaluate the genetic diversity of 17 (10 dent and 7 flint) inbred lines of maize in relation to yield performance of 70 hybrids produced according to North Carolina II design “dent × flint”. To assess genetic divergence among 17 inbred lines, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) molecular markers were used. Twelve different, primers consisting of 18 nucleotides were used to produce a total of 404 reproducible amplification DNA fragments, the majority of which were polymorphic. The values of genetic distance were calculated according to Nei & Li method (1979). The genetic distance among pairs of inbred lines ranged from 0.29 to 0.72. A dendrogram was constructed by an unweighted pair-group method using arithmetic averages (UPGMA). Cluster analysis divided the inbred lines into three groups: one including the flint lines only, and two groups composed of the dent type lines. The average value of genetic distance for pair comparison between the dent lines was higher (GD = 0.56) than that for the flint lines (GD = 0.46). Regression of hybrids grain yield on a genetic distance of their parental inbred lines showed very low correlation. The method used in this research is useful to allocate lines into a heterotic group rather than predict hybrid yield performance.


Keywords:

Zea mays L., hybrid performance, molecular markers,

Adamczyk J. 2001. Wprowadzenie do krajowych materiałów hodowlanych plazmy zarodkowej kukurydzy północnoamerykańskiej (Zea mays L.). Monografie i Rozprawy Naukowe IHAR. Nr 13. Radzików.
Google Scholar

Ajmone Marsan P., Castiglioni P., Fusari F., Kuiper M., Motto M. 1998. Genetic diversity and its relationship to hybrid performance in maize as revealed by RFLP and AFLP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96: 219 — 227.
Google Scholar

Balestre M., Machado J. C., Lima J. L., Souza. J. C., Nóbrega Filho L. 2008. Genetic distance estimates among single cross hybrids and correlation with specific combining ability and yield in corn double cross hybrids. Genetics and Molecular Research 7 (1): 65 — 73.
Google Scholar

Bernardo R. 1994. Prediction of single-cross performance using RFLPs and information from related hybrids. Crop Sci. 34: 20 — 25.
Google Scholar

Bruel D. C., Carpentieri-Pípolo V., Gerage A. C., da Silva Fonseca Júnior N., Cavenaghi Prete C. E., de Fátima Ruas C., Ruas P. M., de Souza S.G.H., Garbuglio D. D. 2006. Genetic distance estimated by RAPD markers and its relationship with hybrid performance in maize. Pesq. Agropec. Bras., Brasília, vol. 41, n. 10.
Google Scholar

Cress C. E. 1966. Heterosis of the hybrid related to gene frequency differences between two populations. Genetics 53: 269 — 274.
Google Scholar

Dudley J. W., Saghai Maroof M. A., Rufener G. K. 1991. Molecular markers and grouping parents in maize breeding programs. Crop Sci. 31:718–723.
Google Scholar

Dudley J.W. 1994. Comparison of genetic distance estimators using molecular-marker data. In: Proc. Symp. Analysis of Molecular-Marker Data. Joint Plant Breeding Symposia Series, American Society for Horticultural Science, Crop Science Society of America, 5–6 August 1994, Corvallis Oregon: 3 — 7.
Google Scholar

Falkoner D. S. 1974. Dziedziczenie cech ilościowych. PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Frascaroli E., Cane M.A., Landi P., Pea G., Gianfranceschi L., Villa M., Morgante M., Pe M. E. 2007. Classical genetic and quantitative trait loci analyses of heterosis in a maize hybrid between two elite inbred lines. Genetics 176: 625 — 644.
Google Scholar

Godshalk E. B, Lee M, Lamkey K. R. 1990. Relationship of restriction fragment length polymorphisms to single-cross hybrid performance of maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80: 273 — 280.
Google Scholar

Lanza L. L. B., Souza Júnior C. L., Ottoboni L. M. N., Vieira M. L. C., Souza A. P. 1997. Genetic distance of inbred lines and prediction of maize single-cross performance using RAPD markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 94: 1023 — 1030.
Google Scholar

Lee E.A., Lee M., Lamkey K. R. 1990. RFLP analysis of isogenic lines B14 and B14A. Maize Genet Coop Newslett 64: 20.
Google Scholar

Lübberstedt T., Melchinger, A. E., Dußle C., Vuylsteke M., Kuiper M. 2000. Relationships among early European maize inbreds: IV. Genetic diversity revealed with AFLP markers and comparison with RFLP, RAPD, and pedigree data. Crop Sci. 40: 783 — 791.
Google Scholar

Lynch M. 1990. The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution. 45 (3): 622 — 629.
Google Scholar

Melchinger A. E. 1999. Genetic diversity and heterosis. In: The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. Coors J.G., Pandey S. (red.) ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, p. 99 — 118.
Google Scholar

Melchinger A. E., Messmer M. M., Lee M., Woodman W. L., Lamkey K. R. 1991. Diversity and relationships among U.S. maize inbreds revealed by restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Crop Sci. 31: 669 — 678.
Google Scholar

Mohammadi S. A., Prasanna B. M., Sudan C., Singh N. N. 2008. SSR heterogenic patterns of maize parental lines and prediction of hybrid performance. Biotechnol. & Biotechnol. EQ. 22/2008/1: 541 — 547.
Google Scholar

Moll R. H., Lonnquist J. H., Velez Fortuno J., Johnson E. C. 1965. The relationship of heterosis and genetic divergence in maize. Genetics 52: 139 — 144.
Google Scholar

Nei M.; Li W. H. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, Allahabad, 76: 5269 — 5273.
Google Scholar

Niebur W. S., Rafalski J. A., Smith O. S., Cooper M. 2004. Applications of genomics technologies to enhance rate of genetic progress for yield of maize within a commercial breeding program. New directions for a diverse planet. Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress, Brisbane, Australia.
Google Scholar

Rafalski A., Gidzińska M., Wiśniewska I. 1998. Systemy PCR w badaniach pokrewieństwa genetycznego linii kukurydzy. Biul. IHAR 208: 131 — 140.
Google Scholar

Reif, J. C., Melchinger A. E., Xia X. C., Warburton M. L., Hoisington D. A., Vasal S. K., Srinivasan G., Bohn M., Frisch M. 2003. Genetic distance based on simple sequence repeats and heterosis in tropical maize populations. Crop Sci. 43:1275 — 1282.
Google Scholar

Wolko B., Bartkowiak-Broda I. 1997. Metody diagnostyki molekularnej w hodowli roślin. W: Hodowla Roślin, mat. z I Krajowej Konferencji, Bartkowiak-Broda I, Święcicki W. (red.). Poznań, 1997: 389 — 402.
Google Scholar

Vuylsteke M., Kuiper M., Stam P. 2000. Chromosomal regions involved in hybrid performance and heterosis: their AFLP®-based identification and practical use in prediction models. Heredity 85: 208 — 218.
Google Scholar


Published
2009-09-30

Cited by

Rogacki, J. (2009) “Genetic distance among inbred lines of maize and its association with hybrid performance”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (253), pp. 231–243. doi: 10.37317/biul-2009-0039.

Authors

Janusz Rogacki 
smolice@hrsmolice.pl
HR Smolice Sp. z o.o. Gr. IHAR Poland

Authors

Zofia Bulińska-Radomska 

Krajowe Centrum Roślinnych Zasobów Genowych, IHAR Radzików Poland

Authors

Jakub Dzienkiewicz 

Krajowe Centrum Roślinnych Zasobów Genowych, IHAR Radzików Poland

Authors

Józef Adamaczyk 

HR Smolice Sp. z o.o. Gr. IHAR Poland

Authors

Henryk Cygert 

HR Smolice Sp. z o.o. Gr. IHAR Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 23
PDF downloads: 12


License

Copyright (c) 2009 Janusz Rogacki, Zofia Bulińska-Radomska, Jakub Dzienkiewicz, Józef Adamaczyk, Henryk Cygert

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.