Związki między plonem ziarna a jego składowymi w populacji rodów hodowlanych pszenżyta ozimego w trzech stacjach doświadczalnych

Adams M. W. 1967. Basis of yield component compensation in crop plants with special reference to field bean. Crop Sci. 7: 505 — 510.
Google Scholar

Adugna W., Labuschagne M. T. 2003. Association of linseed characters and its variability in different environments. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge 140: 285 — 296.
Google Scholar

Agrama H.A.S. 1996. Sequential path analysis of grain yield and its components in maize. Plant Breeding 115: 343 — 346.
Google Scholar

Al-Yassin A., Grando S., Kafawin O., Tell A., Ceccarelli S. 2005. Heritability estimates in contrasting environments as influenced by the adaptation level of barley germ plasm. Annals of Applied Biology 147: 235 — 244.
Google Scholar

Annicchiarico P. 2002. Genotype-environment interactions: challenges and opportunity for plant breeding and cultivar recommendations. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper No. 174. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
Google Scholar

Annicchiarico P. Pecetti L. 1998. Yield vs. morphophysiological trait-based criteria for selection of durum wheat in a semi-arid Mediterranean region (northern Syria). Field Crops Research 59: 163 — 173.
Google Scholar

Annicchiarico P., Pecetti L. 1993. Contribution of some agronomic traits to durum wheat performance in a dry Mediterranean region of Northern Syria. Agronomie 13: 25 — 34.
Google Scholar

Annicchiarico P., Pecetti L., Boggini G., Doust M.A. 2000. Repeatability of large-scale germplasm evaluation results in durum wheat. Crop Sci.40: 1810 — 1814.
Google Scholar

Annicchiarico P., Pecetti P. 1995. Morpho-physiological traits to complement grain yield selection under semi-arid Mediterranean conditions in each of the durum wheat types Mediterranean typicum and syriacum. Euphytica 86: 191 — 198.
Google Scholar

Ball R. A., McNew R. W., Vories E. D., Keisling T. C., Purcell L. C. 2001. Path analyses of population density effects on short-season soybean yield. Agron. J. 93: 187 — 195.
Google Scholar

Bänziger M., Bertran F. J., Lafitte H. R. 1997. Efficiency of high nitrogen selection environments for improving maize for low-nitrogen target environments. Crop Sci. 37: 1103 — 1109.
Google Scholar

Board J. E., Kang M. S., Bodrero M. L. 2003. Yield components as indirect selection criteria for late-planted soybean cultivars. Agron. J. 95:420 — 429.
Google Scholar

Brancourt-Hulmel M., Heumez E., Pluchard P., Beghin D, Depatureaux C., Giraud A., Le Gouis J. 2005. Indirect versus direct selection of winter wheat for low input or high input levels. Crop Sci. 45: 1427 — 1431.
Google Scholar

Budzyński W., Jankowski K., Szempliński W. 2003. Cultivar-related and agronomic conditions of rye yielding on good rye soil suitability complex part I. Yield and its relationship with the yield components. Vol. 6, issue 1, Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities, ser. Agronomy.
Google Scholar

Ceccarelli S. 1996. Adaptation to low/high input cultivation. Euphytica 92: 203 — 214.
Google Scholar

Ceccarelli S., Acevedo E., Grando S. 1991. Breeding for yield stability in unpredictable environments: single traits, interaction between traits, and architecture of genotypes. Euphytica 56: 169 — 185.
Google Scholar

Collaku A. 1994. Selection for yield and its components in a winter wheat population under different environmental conditions in Albania. Plant Breeding 112: 40 — 46.
Google Scholar

Cooper M., DeLacy L. H. 1994. Relationships among analytical methods used to study genotypic variation genotype by environment interaction in plant breeding multi-environment experiments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 88:561 — 572.
Google Scholar

Cooper M., Stucker R. E., DeLacy I. H., Harch B. D. 1997. Wheat breeding nurseries, target environments, and indirect selection for grain yield. Crop Sci. 37:1168 — 1176.
Google Scholar

de la Vega A. J., Chapman S. C., Hall A. J. 2001. Genotype by environment interaction and indirect selection for yield in sunflower. I. Two-mode pattern analysis of oil and biomass yield across environments in Argentina. Field Crops Res. 72:17 — 38.
Google Scholar

Dofing M., Knight W. 1992. Alternative model for path analysis of small-grain yield. Crop Sci. 32 487 — 489.
Google Scholar

Donaldson E., Schillinger W. F., Dofing S. M. 2001, Straw production and grain yield relationships in winter wheat. Crop Sci. 41: 100 — 106.
Google Scholar

Duggan B. L., Domitruk D. R., Fowler D. B. 2000. Yield component variation in winter wheat grown under drought stress. Can. J. Plant Sci. 80: 739 — 745.
Google Scholar

El Madidi S., Diani Z., Aameur F.B. 2005. Variation of agro-morphological characters in Moroccan barley landraces under near optimal and drought conditions. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52:831 — 838.
Google Scholar

García del Moral L. F., Rharrabti Y., Elhani S., Martos V., Royo C. 2005. Yield formation in Mediterranean durum wheats under two contrasting water regimes based on path-coefficient analysis. Euphytica 146: 203 — 212.
Google Scholar

Garcıa del Moral L.F., Rharrabti Y., Villegas D., Royo C. 2003. Evaluation of grain yield and its components in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions: an ontogenic approach. Agron. J. 95: 266 — 274.
Google Scholar

Giunta F., Motzo R., Deidda M. 1999. Grain yield analysis of a triticale (X_Triticosecale Wittmack) collection grown in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Research 63: 199 — 210.
Google Scholar

Gravois K. A. 1998. Optimizing selection for rough rice yield, head rice, and total milled rice. Euphytica 101: 151 — 156.
Google Scholar

Gravois K. A., McNew R. W. 1993. Genetic relationships among and selection for rice yield and yield components. Crop Sci. 33: 249 — 252.
Google Scholar

Hamblin J., Fisher H.M., Ridings H.I. 1980. The choice of locality for plant breeding when selecting for high yield and general adaptation. Euphytica 29: 161 — 168.
Google Scholar

Kenga R., Tenkouano A., Gupta S. C., Alabi S. O. 2006. Genetic and phenotypic association between yield components in hybrid sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) populations. Euphytica 150: 319 — 326.
Google Scholar

Khanna-Chopra R., Viswanathan C. 1999. Evaluation of heat stress tolerance in irrigated environment of T. aestivum and related species. I. Stability in yield and yield components. Euphytica 106: 169 — 180.
Google Scholar

Kozak M., Kang M. S. 2006. Note on modern path analysis in application to crop science. Commun. Biom. Crop Sci. 1: 32 — 34.
Google Scholar

Kozak M., Mądry W. 2005. Metody statystyczne analizy składowych plonu. Postępy Nauk Rolniczych 1/313: 33 — 45.
Google Scholar

Kozak M., Mądry W. 2006 Note on yield component analysis. Cereal Research Communications 34: 933 — 940.
Google Scholar

Kozak M., Samborski S., Rozbicki J., Mądry W. 2007. Winter triticale grain yield, a comparative study of 15 genotypes. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B- Soil and Plant Science 57: 263 — 270.
Google Scholar

Krajewski P., Kaczmarek Z., Czajka S. 2006. EKSPLAN wersja 2. Planowanie i analiza statystyczna doświadczeń hodowlanych. Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN, Poznań.
Google Scholar

Laperche A., Brancourt-Hulmel M., Heumez E., Gardet O., Le Gouis J, 2006. Estimation of genetic parameters of a DH wheat population grown at different N stress levels characterized by probe genotypes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 112: 797 — 807.
Google Scholar

Leilah A. A., Al-Khateeb S. A. 2005. Statistical analysis of wheat yield under drought conditions. J. Arid Environ. 61: 483 — 496.
Google Scholar

Mahmood T., Rahman M. H., Stringam G. R., Yeh F., Good A. 2005. Molecular markers for yield components in Brassica juncea — do these assist in breeding for high seed yield? Euphytica 144: 157 — 167.
Google Scholar

Mądry W. 2004. Modele i metody statystyczne analizy interakcji genotypowo-środowiskowej, stabilności i adaptacji genotypów. Post. Nauk Roln. 2/308: 29 — 43.
Google Scholar

Mądry W., Pietrzykowski R., Rozbicki J. 1995. Analiza współczynników ścieżek dla cech rozwijających się w trakcie ontogenezy oraz plonu ziarna pszenżyta ozimego. Roczn. Nauk Roln. Seria A, 111: 9 — 21.
Google Scholar

Mohammadi S. A., Prasanna B. M., Singh N. N. 2003. Sequential path model for determining interrelationships among grain yield and related characters in maize. Crop Sci. 43: 1690 — 1697.
Google Scholar

Moragues M., Garcıa del Moral L. F., Moralejo M., Royo C. 2006. Yield formation strategies of durum wheat landraces with distinct pattern of dispersal within the Mediterranean basin. I. Yield components. Field Crops Res. 95:194 — 205.
Google Scholar

Motzo R., Giunta F., Deidda M. 2001. Factors affecting the genotype × environment interaction in spring triticale grown in a Mediterranean environment. Euphytica 121:317 — 324.
Google Scholar

Noffsinger S.L., Huyghe C., van Santen E. 2000. Analysis of grain-yield components and inflorescence levels in winter-type white lupin. Agron J. 92:1195 — 1202.
Google Scholar

Ober E. S., Clark C. J. A., Le Bloa M., Royal A., Jaggard K. W., Pidgeon J. D. 2004. Assessing the genetic resources to improve drought tolerance in sugar beet: agronomic traits of diverse genotypes under droughted and irrigated conditions. Field Crops Research 90:213–234.
Google Scholar

Oettler G., Tams S. H., Utz H. F., Bauer E., Melchinger A. E. 2005. Prospects for hybrid breeding in winter triticale: I. Heterosis and combining ability for agronomic traits in European elite germplasm. Crop Sci. 45:1476 — 1482.
Google Scholar

Padi F. K. 2004. Relationship between stress tolerance and grain yield stability in cowpea. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge 142: 431 — 443.
Google Scholar

Peltonen-Sainio P., Kangas A., Salo Y., Jauhiainen L. 2007. Grain number dominates grain weight in temperate cereal yield determination: Evidence based on 30 years of multi-location trials. Field Crops Res. 100: 179 — 188.
Google Scholar

PN-68/R-74017. 1968. Oznaczanie masy 1000 ziarn. Ziarno zbóż i nasiona strączkowe jadalne.
Google Scholar

Rabiei B., Valizadeh M., Ghareyazie B., Moghaddam M. 2004. Evaluation of selection indices for improving rice grain shape. Field Crops Research 89: 359 — 367.
Google Scholar

Rasmusson D. C. 1987: An evaluation of ideotype breeding. Crop Sci. 27: 1140 — 1146.
Google Scholar

Razi H., Assad M.T.1999. Comparison of selection criteria in normal and limited irrigation in sunflower. Euphytica 105: 83 — 90.
Google Scholar

Reynolds M. P., Condon A. G., Vargas M., Calderini D. 2007. Effects of source/sink traits on yield, biomass and radiation use efficiency of random sister lines from three wheat crosses in a high yield environment. Journal of Agricultural Science 145: 3 — 16.
Google Scholar

Richards R. A., Rebetzke G. J., Condon A. G., van Herwaarden A. F. 2002. Breeding opportunities for increasing the efficiency of water use and crop yield in temperate cereals. Crop Sci. 42:111 — 121.
Google Scholar

Rozbicki J. 1997. Agrotechniczne uwarunkowania wzrostu, rozwoju i plonowania pszenżyta ozimego. Fundacja "Rozwój SGGW".
Google Scholar

Rozbicki J., Mądry W. 1999. Zależność plonu ziarna pszenżyta ozimego od jego składowych na plantacjach produkcyjnych. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych Seria A 114: 109 — 115.
Google Scholar

Samonte P. B., Wilson L.T., McClung A.M. 1998. Path analyses of yield and yield-related traits of fifteen diverse rice genotypes. Crop Sci. 38: 1130 — 1136.
Google Scholar

Samonte PB., Wilson L.T., Tabien R.E. 2006. Maximum node production rate and main culm node number contributions to yield and yield-related traits in rice. Field Crops Research 96: 313 — 19.
Google Scholar

SAS Institute. 2001. SAS system for Windows. v. 8.2. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
Google Scholar

Shenkut A. A., Brick M. A. 2003. Traits associated with dry edible bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity under diverse soil moisture environments. Euphytica 133: 339 — 347.
Google Scholar

Simane B., Struik P. C., Nachit M. M., Peacock P. M. 1993. Ontogenetic analysis of yield components and yield stability of durum wheat in water-limited environments. Euphytica 71: 211 — 219.
Google Scholar

Sinebo W. 2002. Yield relationships of barleys grown in a tropical highland environment. Crop Sci.42: 428 — 437.
Google Scholar

Sinebo W., Gretzmacher R., Edelbauer A. 2002. Environment of selection for grain yield in low fertilizer input barley. Field Crops Res. 74: 151 — 162.
Google Scholar

Slafer G. A., Calderini D. F., Miralles D. J. 1996. Yield components and compensation in wheat: opportunities for further increasing yield potential. In: Increasing yield potential in wheat: Breaking the barriers. CIMMYT: Mexico D.F. (Eds Reynolds M.P., Rajaram S., McNab A.): 101 — 133.
Google Scholar

Talbert L. E., Lanning S. P., Murphy R. L., Martin J. M.. 2001. Grain fill duration in twelve hard red spring wheat crosses: Genetic variation and association with other agronomic traits. Crop Sci. 41: 1390 — 1395.
Google Scholar

Ud-Din N., Carver B. F., Clutter A. C. 1992. Genetic analysis and selection for wheat yield in drought-stressed and irrigated environments. Euphytica 62: 89 — 96.
Google Scholar

van Oosterom E. J., Weltzien E., Yadav O. P., Bidinger F. R. 2006. Grain yield components of pearl millet under optimum conditions can be used to identify germplasm with adaptation to arid zones. Field Crops Research 96:407 — 421.
Google Scholar

Villegas D., Garcıa del Moral L. F., Rharrabti Y., Martos V., Royo C. 2007. Morphological traits above the flag leaf node as indicators of drought susceptibility index in durum wheat. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 193: 103 — 116.
Google Scholar

Wu Y. Q., Taliaferro C. M., Martin D. L., Goad C. L., Andersen J. A. 2006. Genetic variability and relationships for seed yield and its components in Chinese Cynodon accessions Field Crops Research 98: 245 — 252.
Google Scholar

Yan W., Hunt L. A. 2001. Interpretation of genotype × environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. Crop Sci. 41: 19 — 25.
Google Scholar

Yan W., Wallace D. H. 1995. Breeding for negatively associated traits. Plant Breeding Reviews 13: 141 — 177.
Google Scholar