Variability of quantitative traits of two mutated grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.) cultivars

Wojciech Rybiński

office@igr.poznan.pl
Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN w Poznaniu (Poland)

Jan Bocianowski


Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu (Poland)

Katarzyna Pankiewicz


Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN w Poznaniu (Poland)

Abstract

Grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.) is cultivated in Poland (Podlasie and adjacent regions) since 200 years. Although this pulse crop is characterized by high protein content (26-34%) and unique resistance against abiotic stresses, grasspea plays a marginal role in Polish agriculture. This indicates, among others, the necessity of genetic improvement of this crop to make grasspea more competitive as compared to others pulse crops. A local population of grasspea present in the Podlasie region since many years is characterized by narrow gene pool which limits effective selection in breeding works leading to release improved cultivars. Recombination but mainly induced mutations may enrich the existing grasspea materials with an additional variability of traits important in agriculture. As a result of mutagenic treatment of seeds of two Polish cultivars: Derek and Krab (derived from a local Podlasie population) with chemomutagens, in M2 progeny many changed plants were selected. After propagation of obtained lines in next generation, part of them constituted initial material for field trials conducted in 2004–2006. The aim of this work was an estimation of quantitative traits variations of mutants in comparison to initial cultivars. The results obtained from field trials were analyzed with a use of multivariate statistics. The two-way analysis of variance was carried out to determine the effects of objects, years and objects  years interaction on the variability of observed phenotypic traits. The mean values and coefficient of variation were estimated. For jointly analyzed results from all years, the highest coefficients of variation were obtained for plant height, number of pods per plant, number and seed weight per plant and 1000 seed weight, and the lowest for flowering times, seeds number per pod and length and broad of pod. The values of contrast in comparisons between initial cultivars (control) and mutants in the most cases were positive which indicated higher values of traits for cultivars. Based on Mahalnobis distances the similarity of particular forms in comparison to cultivars for all traits together were estimated. The forms with highest and lowest similarity to cultivars were distinguished. Part of them, characterized by desirable traits from breeding point of view, can constitute a valuable initial material for further work on genetic improvement of domestic grasspea.


Keywords:

Lathyrus sativus, field trials, multivariate analysis, mutants, quantitative traits

Ahloowalia B. S, Małuszyński M. 2001. Induced mutations — a new paradigm in plant breeding. Euphytica 118: 167 — 173.
Google Scholar

Ahloowalia B. S., Małuszyński M., Nitcherlein K. 2004. Global impact of mutation — derived varieties. Euphytica 135: 187 — 204.
Google Scholar

Allkin R., Macfarlane T. D., White F. A., Bisby F. A., Adey M. E. 1983. Names and synonyms of species and subspecies in Vicieae. Issue 2, Vicieae Database Project Publication No. 2, Southampton, UK.
Google Scholar

Bocianowski J., Liersch A., Bartkowiak-Broda I. 2009. Badanie zmienności fenotypowej mieszańców F1 CMS ogura rzepaku ozimego i ich form rodzicielskich za pomocą statystycznych metod wielowymiarowych. Rośliny Oleiste — Oilseed Crops XXX: 161 — 184.
Google Scholar

Bocianowski J., Rybiński W. 2006. Wykorzystanie wielowymiarowej metodyki oceny cech ilościowych mutantów lędźwianu siewnego (Lathyrus sativus L.) uzyskanych działaniem chemomutagenów i światła lasera helowo-neonowego. Acta Agrophysica 8 (4): 791 — 802.
Google Scholar

Bocianowski J., Rybiński W. 2008. Wykorzystanie analizy zmiennych kanonicznych do wielocechowej charakterystyki dwurzędowych i wielorzędowych linii DH jęczmienia jarego (Hordeum vulgare L.). Annales UMCS, Sectio E: Agricultura LXIII (3): 53 — 61.
Google Scholar

Bocianowski J., Skomra U. 2008. Wykorzystanie analizy zmiennych kanonicznych do wielocechowej charakterystyki odmian chmielu zwyczajnego (Humulus lupulus L.). Pamiętnik Puławski 148: 107 — 118.
Google Scholar

Bocianowski J., Stokłosa A. 2010. Ocena kiełkowania odmian botanicznych owsa głuchego (Avena fatua L.) w różnych warunkach świetlnych i termicznych za pomocą analizy zmiennych kanonicznych. Nauka Przyroda Technologie 4: 60 — 65.
Google Scholar

Caliński T., Kaczmarek Z. 1973. Metody kompleksowej analizy doświadczenia wielocechowego. Colloquium Metodologiczne z Agrobiometrii, PAN i PTB, Warszawa, 3: 258 — 320.
Google Scholar

Campbell C. G., Mehra R. B., Agrawal S. K., Chen, Y. Z., Abd El Moneim A. M., Khawaja H. I. T., Yadow, C. R., Tay, J. U., Araya, W. A. 1994. Current status and future strategy in breeding grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Euphytica 73: 167 — 175.
Google Scholar

Campbell C. G. 1997. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. 18. Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research. Gatersleben/International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy.
Google Scholar

Camussi A., Ottaviano E., Caliński T., Kaczmarek Z. 1985. Genetic distances based on quantitative traits. Genetics 111: 945 — 962.
Google Scholar

Dziamba S. 1997. Biologia i agrotechnika lędźwianu siewnego. Międzynarodowe Sympozjum Naukowe „Lędźwian siewny — agrotechnika i wykorzystanie w żywieniu zwierząt i ludzi”, Radom, 9–10 czerwca 1997: 27 — 33.
Google Scholar

GenStat 2007. GenStat Release 10 Reference Manual, Lawes Agricultural Trust Rothamsted.
Google Scholar

Grela E. R., Rybiński W., Klebaniuk R., Matras J. 2010. Morphological characteristics of some accessions of grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.) grown in Europe and nutritional traits of their seeds. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 57 (5): 693 — 701.
Google Scholar

Hanbury C. D., Sarker A., Siddique K. H. M., Perry M. W. 1995. Evaluation of Lathyrus germplasm in a Mediterranean type environment in South-Western Australia. Cooperative Research Center for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture, Occasional Paper, No 8. Perth.
Google Scholar

Kislev M. E. 1986. Archeobotanical findings of the origin of Lathyrus sativus and L. cicera. In: Lathyrus and Lathyrism (Eds. Kaul A.K. and Combes D.). Third World Medical Research Foundation, New York: 46 — 51.
Google Scholar

Mahalanobis P. C. 1936. On the generalized distance in statistics. Proceedings of the National Institute of Science of India 12: 49 — 55.
Google Scholar

Milczak M., Pędziński M., Mnichowska H., Szwed-Urbaś K. 1997. Hodowla twórcza lędźwianu siewnego (Lathyrus sativus L.) — podsumowanie pierwszego etapu. Międzynarodowe Sympozjum Naukowe „Lędźwian siewny — agrotechnika i wykorzystanie w żywieniu zwierząt i ludzi”. Radom, 9–10 czerwca 1997: 13 — 22.
Google Scholar

Milczak M., Pędziński M., Mnichowska H., Szwed-Urbaś K., Rybiński W. 2001. Creative breeding of grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.) in Poland. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter 2: 18 — 23.
Google Scholar

Pandey R. L., Agraval S. K., Chitale M. W., Sharma R. N., Kashyap O. P., Geda A. K., Chandrakar H. K., Agrawal K. K. 1995. Catalogue of grasspea (L. sativus L.) germplasm. I. Gandhi Agric. Univ. Press, Raipur, India.
Google Scholar

Rencher A. C. 1992. Interpretation of canonical discriminate functions, canonical varieties, and principal components. Am. Stat. 46: 217 — 225.
Google Scholar

Robertson L. D., Abd El Moneim A. M. 1995. Status of Lathyrus germplasm held at ICARDA and its use in breeding programmes. In: R. K. Arora, P. N. Mathur, K. W. Riley & Y. Adham (Eds.), Lathyrus Genetic Resources in Asia. Proceedings of a Regional Workshop, 27–29 December, Raipur, India: 97–111.
Google Scholar

Rybiński W., Bocianowski J. 2006 a. Zmienność cech ilościowych roślin lędźwianu siewnego (Lathyrus sativus L.) pokolenia M1 uzyskanego działaniem chemomutagenów. Biul. IHAR 240/241: 285 — 290.
Google Scholar

Rybiński W., Bocianowski J. 2006 b. Zmienność cech morfologicznych i struktury plonu nasion mutantów lędźwianu siewnego (Lathyrus sativus L.). Biul. IHAR 240/241: 291 — 297.
Google Scholar

Rybiński W., Bocianowski J., Pankiewicz K. 2008 a. Zróżnicowanie cech morfologicznych i plonotwórczych u indukowanych mutantów odmian lędźwianu siewnego (Lathyrus sativus L.). Biul. IHAR 249: 217 — 231.
Google Scholar

Rybiński W., Szot B., Rusinek R. 2008b. Estimation of morphological and mechanical properties of grasspea seeds (Lathyrus sativus L.) originating from EU countries. International Agrophysics 22: 261 — 275.
Google Scholar

Rybiński W., Szot B., Rusinek R., Bocianowski J. 2009. Estimation of geometric and mechanical properties of seed of Polish cultivars and lines representing selected species of pulse crops. International Agrophysics 23: 257—267.
Google Scholar

Sarwar C. D. M., Sarkar A., Murshed A. N. M. M., Malik M. A. 1995. Variation in natural population of grass pea. In: Lathyrus sativus and Human Lathyrism. Progress and Prospects. Proc. 2nd Int. Colloq. Lathyrus Lathyrism, 10–12 December 1993, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Google Scholar

Sawicka E. 1993. Induced mutations in Andean lupine (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet). Prace Ogrodu Botanicznego. Seria: Monografie i Rozprawy 3: 1 — 101.
Google Scholar

Seidler-Łożykowska K., Król D., Bocianowski J. 2010. Zawartość olejku eterycznego i jego skład w owocach pochodzących z kolekcji kminku zwyczajnego (Carum carvi L.). Rośliny Oleiste — Oilseed Crops XXXI: 147 — 160.
Google Scholar

Vaz Patto M. C., Skiba B., Pang E. C. K., Ochatt S. J., Lambein F., Rubiales D. 2006. Lathyrus improvement for resistance against biotic and abiotic stresses: From classical breeding to marker assisted selection. Euphytica 147: 133 — 147.
Google Scholar

Waghmare V. N., Mehra R. B. 2000. Induced mutations in grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter 1: 21 — 24.
Google Scholar


Published
2012-06-28

Cited by

Rybiński, W., Bocianowski, J. and Pankiewicz, K. (2012) “Variability of quantitative traits of two mutated grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.) cultivars”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (264), pp. 211–226. doi: 10.37317/biul-2012-0071.

Authors

Wojciech Rybiński 
office@igr.poznan.pl
Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN w Poznaniu Poland

Authors

Jan Bocianowski 

Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu Poland

Authors

Katarzyna Pankiewicz 

Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN w Poznaniu Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 43
PDF downloads: 45


License

Copyright (c) 2012 Wojciech Rybiński, Jan Bocianowski, Katarzyna Pankiewicz

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>