Estimation of genetic variability and of β-ODAP neurotoxin content in chosen species of the genus Lathyrus

Katarzyna Pankiewicz

office@igr.poznan.pl
Instytut Genetyki Roślin Polskiej Akademii Nauk w Poznaniu (Poland)

Wojciech Rybiński


Instytut Genetyki Roślin Polskiej Akademii Nauk w Poznaniu (Poland)

Abstract

The aim of the study was to estimate of genetic variability among species chosen from the Lathyrus collection with the use of polymorphic random amplified DNA fragments and to analyze β-N-oxalyl-L-α-β-diaminopropionic acid content (β-ODAP) of seeds. Plants of four species: L. sativus, L. cicera, L. tingitanus and L. gorgoni were evaluated. RAPD-PCR reaction for twenty-eight 10- nucleotide primers (with random sequence) showed 97% polymorphism. Coefficients of genetic similarity, calculated according to Nei’s method, ranged from 0.21 for a pair L. tingitanus - L. cicera to 0.53 for L. sativus - L. cicera. The highest intraspecies similarity was observed for accessions of L. sativus (0.84), and the lowest one for accessions of L. tingitanus (0.38). Content of β-ODAP neurotoxin was analyzed with the use of specific reaction with o-phthalaldehyde (OPT) and absorbance measured at by 425 nm. The highest content of neurotoxin in dry matter of seeds (1g/kg d.m.) was found in L. tingitanus and L. gorgoni. Comparatively, the content of neurotoxin recorded for seeds of one of the accessions derived from L. sativus was 20- fold lower.


Keywords:

Lathyrus, β-ODAP, RAPD, genetic similarity

Addis G., Narayan R. J. K. 1994. Developmental variation of the neurotoxin, β-N -oxalyl-l -α,β-diaminopropionic acid (ODAP), in Lathyrus sativus. Ann. Botany 74: 209 — 215.
Google Scholar

Belaïd, Y., Chtourou-Ghorbel N., Marrakchi M., Trifi-Farah N. 2006. Genetic diversity within and between populations of Lathyrus genus (Fabaceae) revealed by ISSR markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 53: 1413 — 1418.
Google Scholar

Briggs C. J., Parreno N., Campbell C. G. 1983. Photochemical assessment of Lathyrus species for the neurotoxin agent, β-N -oxalyl-l -α,β-diaminopropionic acid. Planta Med. 47:188 — 190.
Google Scholar

Campbell C. J., Briggs C. J. 1987. Registration of low neurotoxin content Lathyrus germplasm LS8246. Crop Science 27: 821.
Google Scholar

Campbell C. G., Mehra R. B., Agrawal S .K., Chen Y.Z., Abd El Moneim A., Khawaja H. I. T., Yadov C. R., Tay J. U., Araya W. A. 1994. Current status and future research strategy in breeding grasspea (Lathyrus sativus). Euphytica 73: 167–175.
Google Scholar

Campbell C. G. 1997. Grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. 18. Institute of Plant genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben/International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy: 1 — 92.
Google Scholar

Chtourou-Ghorbel N., Lauga B., Ben Brahim N., Combes D., Marrakchi M. 2002.Genetic variation analysis in the genus Lathyrus using RAPD markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, Vol. 49 (4): 365 — 372.
Google Scholar

Croft A. M., Pang E. C. K., Taylor P. W. J. 1999. Molecular analysis of Lathyrus sativus L. (grasspea) and related Lathyrus species. Euphytica 107: 167 — 176.
Google Scholar

Dziamba S. 1997. Agrotechnika i hodowla lędźwianu siewnego. Międzynarodowe Sympozjum Naukowe „Lędźwian siewny – agrotechnika i wykorzystanie w żywieniu zwierząt i ludzi”. Radom, 9-10 czerwca 1997: 27 — 33.
Google Scholar

Getahun, H., Mekonnen, A., Tekle Haimanot, R., Lambein, F., 1999. Epidemic of neurolathyrism in Ethiopia. Lancet 354: 306 — 307.
Google Scholar

Hanbury C. D., Siddique K. H. M., Galwey N. W., Cocks P. S. 1999. Genotype environment interaction for seed yield and ODAP concentration of Lathyrus sativus L. and L. cicera L. in Mediterranean-type environments. Euphytica 110: 45 — 60.
Google Scholar

Hanbury C. D., White C. L., Mullan B. P., Siddique K. H. M. 2000. A review of the potential of Lathyrus sativus L. and L. cicera L. grain for use as animal feed. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 87: 1 — 27.
Google Scholar

Hussain M., Chowdhury B., Haque R., Lambein F. 1997. Effect of water stress, salinity, interaction of cations, stage of maturity of seeds and storage devices on the ODAP content of Lathyrus sativus. In: Tekle Haimanot, R., Lambein, F. , Lathyrus and Lathyrism, a Decade of Progress. University of Ghent, Belgium: 107 — 112.
Google Scholar

Jeswani L. M., Lal B. M., Prakesh S. 1970. Studies on the development of low neurotoxin lines in Lathyrus sativus (Khesari). Curr. Sci.22: 518.
Google Scholar

Mehra R.B., Raju D. B., Himabindu K. 1995. Evaluation and utilization od Lathyrus sativus collection in India. In: Lathyrus Genetic Resources in Asia. Proceedings of a Regional Workshop, 27-29 December 1995. Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, Raipur, India: 37 — 43.
Google Scholar

Murray M. G., Thompson W.F. 1980 Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucl. Acids Res. 8: 4321 — 4325.
Google Scholar

Nei M., Li W. H. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction. Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USA 76: 5269 — 5273.
Google Scholar

Rao S. L. N. 1978. A sensitive and specific colorimetric method for determination of α,β-diaminopropionic acid and Lathyrus sativus neurotoxin. Anal. Biochem. 86: 386 — 395.
Google Scholar

Roy P. K., All K., Gupta A., Barat G. K., Mehta S. L. 1993. β-N -oxalyl-l -α,β-diaminopropionic acid in somaclones derived from internode explants of Lathyrus sativus. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2: 9 — 13.
Google Scholar

Rybiński W. 2003. Mutagenesis as a tool for improvement of traits in grasspea (Lathyrus sativus). Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter 3: 27 — 32.
Google Scholar

Rybiński W., Grela E.R. 2007. Zróżnicowanie genetyczne cech i składu chemicznego nasion mutantów lędźwianu siewnego. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych 517: 613 — 627.
Google Scholar

Santha I.M., Mehta S.L. 2001. Development of low ODAP somaclones of Lathyrus sativus. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter 2: 42.
Google Scholar

Spencer P.S., Ludolph A., Dwivedi M.P., Roy D.N., Hugon J., Schaumburg H.H. 1986. Lathyrism: evidence for role of the neuroexcitary amino acid BOAA. Lancet 2: 1066 — 1067.
Google Scholar

Spencer P.S., Ludolph A.C., Kisby G.E., 1993. Neurologic diseases associated with use of plant components with toxic potential, Environ. Res. 62: 106 — 113.
Google Scholar

Studziński T., Grela E.R. 1997. Składniki przeciwżywieniowe nasion lędźwianu siewnego (Lathyrus sativus L.) i mechanizmy ich szkodliwego działania. Międzynarodowe Sympozjum Naukowe „Lędźwian siewny – agrotechnika i wykorzystanie w żywieniu zwierząt i ludzi”. Radom, 9-10 czerwca 1997: 72 — 79.
Google Scholar

Vaz Patto M. C., Skiba B., Pang E. C. K., Ochatt S. J., Lambein F., Rubiales D. 2006. Lathyrus improvement for resistance against biotic and abiotic stresses: From classical breeding to marker assisted selection. Euphytica 147: 133 — 147.
Google Scholar

Waghmare V. N., Mehra R. B. 2000. Induced mutation in grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter 1: 21 — 24.
Google Scholar


Published
2008-12-31

Cited by

Pankiewicz, K. and Rybiński, W. (2008) “Estimation of genetic variability and of β-ODAP neurotoxin content in chosen species of the genus Lathyrus ”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (250), pp. 287–295. doi: 10.37317/biul-2008-0026.

Authors

Katarzyna Pankiewicz 
office@igr.poznan.pl
Instytut Genetyki Roślin Polskiej Akademii Nauk w Poznaniu Poland

Authors

Wojciech Rybiński 

Instytut Genetyki Roślin Polskiej Akademii Nauk w Poznaniu Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 24
PDF downloads: 33


License

Copyright (c) 2008 Katarzyna Pankiewicz, Wojciech Rybiński

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>