Variability of quantitative traits in grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.) M1 progeny obtained by seed treatment with chemomutagens

Wojciech Rybiński

office@igr.poznan.pl
Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN w Poznaniu (Poland)

Jan Bocianowski


Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu (Poland)

Abstract

The aim of the study was to estimate susceptibility of Polish grasspea cultivars Derek and Krab to the effects of two chemomutagens, and to determine the suitable combination of mutagens to be used in grasspea mutagenesis. The grasspea seeds were treated with two chemomutagens: N-nitroso-N-methylurea (MNU) and sodium azide (SA) with either of the mutagens alone and in combinations: SA followed by MNU or MNU followed by SA, using different mutagen doses. For M1 progeny and control (non-treated) plants the plant height, number of lateral branches and yield structure were evaluated. The results of treatment indicate that chemomutagens applied alone or in combinations caused the decrease in value of the analyzed traits except the plant height. A rate of decrease depended on the initial form used, analyzed trait, kind and dose of mutagen, and the combination applied. Plants of cv. Derek, compared to those of cv. Krab, were found to be more susceptible to treatment with mutagens. Somatic injuries induced by MNU were more serious than those caused by SA, and the effects of treatment with the combination SA + MNU were more harmful than those caused by the combination MNU + SA. It may be concluded from the results obtained that to induce a desirable mutation in grasspea, the combination of two reagents acting in a different way in the process of mutagenesis is most effective.


Keywords:

grasspea, mutagens, M1 progeny, somatic injuries, yield structure

Ahloowalia B. S., Małuszyński M. 2001. Induced mutations — A new paradigm in plant breeding. Euphytica 118: 167 — 173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004162323428
Google Scholar

Ahloovalia B. S., Małuszyński M., Nichterlein K. 2004. Global impact of mutation-derived varieties. Euphytica 135: 187 — 204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EUPH.0000014914.85465.4f
Google Scholar

Ali M. Abd El-Moneim B., Dorrestein M., Mulugeta W. 2000. Improving the nutritional quality and yield potential of grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Food. Nutri. Bull. 21 (4): 493 — 496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/156482650002100428
Google Scholar

Campbell C. G., Mehra R. J., Agrawal S. K., Chen Y. Z., El Moneim B., Khawaja H. I. T., Yadow C. R., Tay J. U., Araya W. A. 1994. Current status and future strategy in breeding grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Euphytica 37: 167 — 175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027192
Google Scholar

Kumar S., Dubey D. K. 1998 a. Influence of separate and simultaneous application of gamma rays, DES and EMS in Khesari (Lathyrus sativus L.). J. Genetics and Breeding 52 (4): 295 — 300.
Google Scholar

Kumar S., Dubey D. K. 1998 b. Effect of separate and simultaneous application of gamma rays and EMS on germination, growth, fertility and yield in cultivars Nirmal and LSD-3 of Khesari (Lathyrus sativus L.). J. Phytological Research 11 (2): 165 — 170.
Google Scholar

Małuszyński M., Nitcherlein K., Van Zanten L., Ahloowalia S. 2000. Officially released mutant varieties — the FAO/IAEA database. Mutation Breeding 12: 1 — 84.
Google Scholar

Rybiński W., Patyna H. 1983. Wpływ zróżnicowanych dawek azydku sodu i MNU na poziom uszkodzeń somatycznych i częstotliwość mutacji u jęczmienia jarego Biul. IHAR 27 (1): 59 — 68.
Google Scholar

Rybiński W., Pokora L. 2002. Wpływ światła lasera helowo-neonowego i chemomutagenu (MNU) na zmienność cech lędźwianu siewnego (Lathyrus sativus L.) w pokoleniu M1. Acta Agrophysica 62: 127 — 134.
Google Scholar

Rybiński W. 2003. Mutagenesis as a tool for improvement of traits in grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter 3: 27 — 31.
Google Scholar

Rybiński W., Starzycki M. 2004. Ocena zmienności genetycznej cech mutantów lędźwianu siewnego (Lathyrus sativus L.). Zesz. Prob. Post. Nauk Roln. 497: 539 — 550.
Google Scholar

Sawicka E. J. 1993. Indukowane mutacje u łubinu andyjskiego (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet.). Prace Ogrodu Botanicznego PAN. Seria: Rozprawy i Monografie, Zesz. 3: 1 — 102.
Google Scholar

Singh M., Chaturvedi S. N. 1987. Effectiveness and efficiency of mutagen alone or in combination with dimethyl sulphoxide in Lathyrus sativus. J. of Agic. Sci. 57: 503 — 507.
Google Scholar

Waghmare V. N., Mehra R. B. 2000. Induced mutations in grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter 1: 21 — 24.
Google Scholar


Published
2006-09-29

Cited by

Rybiński, W. and Bocianowski, J. (2006) “Variability of quantitative traits in grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.) M1 progeny obtained by seed treatment with chemomutagens”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (240/241), pp. 285–290. doi: 10.37317/biul-2006-0063.

Authors

Wojciech Rybiński 
office@igr.poznan.pl
Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN w Poznaniu Poland

Authors

Jan Bocianowski 

Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 242
PDF downloads: 21


License

Copyright (c) 2006 Wojciech Rybiński, Jan Bocianowski

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >>