Grain yield and malting quality of spring barley depending on plant protection against diseases

Alicja Pecio

iung@iung.pulawy.pl
Instytut Uprawy Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa, Puławy (Poland)

Andrzej Bichoński


Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Krakowie (Poland)

Abstract

The investigations on spring barley were carried out at the Experimental Station (ES) of IUNG in Kępa in the years 1996–1998 and at the ES of IUNG in Osiny in the years 1997–1998 and 1998–2000. Positive effects of plant spraying with fungicides on grain yield and its quality were observed. They were shown in the diminished infestation of plants with fungal diseases, significant increase of grain yield and improved malting quality of the grain. The effectiveness of chemical protection depended on the weather conditions during the vegetation periods. The best effects were obtained with Charisma 207 EC, containing two complementary active substances: famoxate and fluzilazole. The former inhibits the production of energy in pathogen cells, whereas the latter reduces the production of ergosterol, the component being necessary for building pathogen cell walls. A delay in plant spraying with fungicides caused the diminished effectiveness of treatment in controlling net blotch infestation, as the disease appeared at the early stages of barley plants development. This, in turn, resulted in the declined grain yield and decreasing of its malting quality.


Keywords:

fungal diseases, fungicides, grain yield, malting quality, spring barley

Bertholdsson N. O. 1999. Characterization of malting barley cultivars with more or less stable protein content under varying environmental conditions. Eur. J. Agron. 10: 1 — 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(98)00043-4
Google Scholar

Błażej J., Błażej J. 2000. Wpływ technologii produkcji na zdrowotność jęczmienia jarego i owsa. Pam. Puł. 120: 23 — 30.
Google Scholar

Jańczak C. 1999. Zwalczanie infekcyjnych chorób zbóż w świetle postępu w rozwoju asortymentu fungicydów do opryskiwania. Prog. Plant Protect./Post. Ochr. Rośl. 39 (2): 805 — 808.
Google Scholar

Jańczak C., Lawecki T., Pawlak A., Ratajczyk G. 1996. Występowanie i szkodliwość chorób grzybowych na różnych odmianach pszenicy. Prog. Plant Protect./Post. Ochr. Rośl. 36 (2): 209 — 211.
Google Scholar

Joshi M., Strenberg J. A. 1997. A broad — spectrum fungicide with a new mode of action. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. — Pests and Dis. DPX — JE874, 1: 21–26.
Google Scholar

Kaniuczak Z. 1997. Badania nad opłacalnością chemicznego zwalczania chorób i szkodników zbóż jarych. Prog. Plant Protect./Post. Ochr. Rośl. 37 (2): 110 — 113.
Google Scholar

Kaniuczak Z. 2001. Efektywność chemicznego zwalczania chorób grzybowych i szkodników w uprawie jęczmienia jarego. Prog. Plant Protect./Post. Ochr. Rośl. 41 (2): 707 — 710.
Google Scholar

Kozłowska-Ptaszyńska Z., Pecio A. 1999. Wpływ ochrony roślin przed chorobami oraz gęstości siewu na plon i architekturę łanu odmian jęczmienia browarnego. Fragm. Agron. 3: 77 — 88.
Google Scholar

Maumene C., Couleaud G. 1998. New fungicides and their introduction in wheat and barley spray programs in France. Abstracts 7th Inter. Congress of Plant Pathology, 9–16 August, Edinburgh, Scotland, vol. 1: 565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s100249900078
Google Scholar

Owera S. A. P., Farrar J. F., Whitbread R. 1981. Growth and photosynthesis in barley infected with brown rust. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 18: 79 — 90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-4059(81)80056-2
Google Scholar

Pecio A., Bichoński A., Ptaszyńska Z. 2000 a. Wpływ chemicznej ochrony roślin przed chorobami oraz gęstości siewu na wartość browarną ziarna jęczmienia jarego. Fragm. Agron. 3: 42 — 52.
Google Scholar

Pecio A., Matysiak R., Bichoński A. 2002. Wpływ fungicydów o różnym mechanizmie działania na wartość browarną ziarna jęczmienia jarego. Prog. Plant Protect./Post. Ochr. Rośl. 42 (2): 832 — 835.
Google Scholar

Pecio A., Pawłowska J., Bichoński A. 2000 b. Plonowanie i wartość browarna ziarna odmian jęczmienia jarego na tle zróżnicowanych sposobów ochrony zasiewów. Fragmenta Agronomica 2: 45 — 61.
Google Scholar

Przulj N., Momcilovic V. 2001. Genetic variation for dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and translocation in two-rowed spring barley. I. Dry matter translocation. Eur. J. Agron. 15: 241 — 254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(01)00109-5
Google Scholar

Rudnicki F. 2000. Wyznaczanie wpływu poszczególnych elementów plonowania na różnice plonów między obiektami doświadczalnymi. Fragm. Agron. 3: 53 — 65.
Google Scholar

Ruiter J. M., Brooking I. R. 1996. Effect of sowing date and nitrogen on dry matter and nitrogen partitioning in malting barley. New Zeland J. Crop and Hortic. Sci. 24 (1): 65 — 76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.1996.9513936
Google Scholar

Smith C. M., Klapproth M. C., Saunders D. W., Johnson L. E. B., Trivella A. E. 1992. Biological properties of fluzilazole contributing to its field performance. Pests and Dis.: 639 — 644.
Google Scholar

Szempliński W., Rzepiński W. 1998. Rolnicza efektywność różnych wariantów technologii produkcji jęczmienia jarego pastewnego. Pam. Puł. 112: 245 — 251.
Google Scholar


Published
2003-12-31

Cited by

Pecio, A. and Bichoński, A. (2003) “Grain yield and malting quality of spring barley depending on plant protection against diseases”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (230), pp. 317–326. doi: 10.37317/biul-2003-0034.

Authors

Alicja Pecio 
iung@iung.pulawy.pl
Instytut Uprawy Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa, Puławy Poland

Authors

Andrzej Bichoński 

Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Krakowie Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 112
PDF downloads: 23


License

Copyright (c) 2003 Alicja Pecio, Andrzej Bichoński

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>