Estimation of progress in potato production in Poland in the years 1986–2001

Part II. Breeding progress in potato production

Dariusz R. Mańkowski

d.mankowski@ihar.edu.pl
Pracownia Ekonomiki Nasiennictwa i Hodowli Roślin, Zakład Nasiennictwa i Nasionoznawstwa, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — Radzików (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7499-8016

Tadeusz Oleksiak


Pracownia Ekonomiki Nasiennictwa i Hodowli Roślin, Zakład Nasiennictwa i Nasionoznawstwa, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — Radzików (Poland)

Abstract

The analysis of breeding progress in potato production was performed based on the results of the survey investigations carried out in commercial farms in the years 1986–2001. A modified Feyerherm’s method was applied. Significant increase of breeding effects in agriculture practice was found. A considerable contribution of cultivar structure optimalization to the yield-creating potential of the potato has been demonstrated. Breeding progress is not often accompanied with technology improvement. Hence, its effects can only contribute to yield level stabilization. Utilization of the yield-creating potential of potato cultivars in the investigated farms was found unsatisfied. Only the yield potential of medium late and late cultivars can be considered to be utilized at an acceptable level.


Keywords:

breeding progress, cultivar effect, potato, survey investigations

Becker H. C., Léon J. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding 101: 1 — 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.x
Google Scholar

Bell M. A., Fischer R. A., Byerlee D., Sayre K. 1995. Genetic and agronomic contributions to yield gains: A case study for wheat. Field Crops Research 44: 55 — 65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(95)00049-6
Google Scholar

Chotkowski J. 2001. Opłacalność produkcji ziemniaków jadalnych przemysłowych I nasiennych. Ziemniak Polski 3: 26-32.
Google Scholar

Dzwonkowski W. 2002. Handel zagraniczny ziemniakami i ich przetworami. Rynek ziemniaka 22: 16 — 20.
Google Scholar

Feyerherm A. M., Paulsen G. H. 1984. Contribution of genetic improvement to recent wheat yield in creases in the USA. Agron. J. 76: 985 — 990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600060027x
Google Scholar

Krzymuski J. 1996. Zmiany w uprawie i w produkcji ziemniaka. Cz. I. Postęp biologiczny. Biul. IHAR 197: 273 — 282.
Google Scholar

Krzymuski J. 1996. Zmiany w uprawie i w produkcji ziemniaka. Cz. III. Produkcja. Biul. IHAR 197: 291 — 298.
Google Scholar

Krzymuski J., Laudański Z. 1996. Zmiany w uprawie i w produkcji ziemniaka. Cz. II. Agrotechnika. Biul. IHAR 197: 283 — 290.
Google Scholar

Krzymuski J., Laudański Z., Oleksiak T. 1993. Metody oceny postępu genetycznego. Zesz. Nauk. Akademii Rolniczej we Wrocławiu Nr 223: 49 — 56.
Google Scholar

Lista Odmian Roślin Rolniczych. 1970–2001. Centralny Ośrodek Badania Odmian Roślin Uprawnych, Słupia Wielka.
Google Scholar

Mańkowski D. 2003. Ocena postępu w uprawie ziemniaka w Polsce w latach 1986–2001, na podstawie badań ankietowych. Część I. Analiza stabilności wybranych odmian ziemniaka. Biul. IHAR 228: 185-191.
Google Scholar

Oleksiak T 2002. Efekty hodowli pszenicy ozimej. Cz. I. Zmiany potencjału plonowania odmian. Biul. IHAR 223/224: 67 — 75.
Google Scholar

Oleksiak T. 1997. Efekty postępu w hodowli rzepaku ozimego w Polsce. Biul. IHAR 201: 27 — 44.
Google Scholar

Oleksiak T. 2000. Pszenżyto w produkcji — wykorzystanie efektów hodowli. Zesz. Nauk. Akademii Rolniczej w Szczecinie, 206, Agricultura (82): 199 — 204.
Google Scholar

Rocznik Statystyczny Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej. 1986–2001. Główny Urząd Statystyczny, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Syntezy Wyników Doświadczeń Odmianowych. Ziemniak. 1999. Centralny Ośrodek Badania Odmian Roślin Uprawnych, Słupia Wielka.
Google Scholar


Published
2003-09-30

Cited by

Mańkowski, D. R. and Oleksiak, T. (2003) “Estimation of progress in potato production in Poland in the years 1986–2001: Part II. Breeding progress in potato production”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (228), pp. 193–203. doi: 10.37317/biul-2003-0104.

Authors

Dariusz R. Mańkowski 
d.mankowski@ihar.edu.pl
Pracownia Ekonomiki Nasiennictwa i Hodowli Roślin, Zakład Nasiennictwa i Nasionoznawstwa, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — Radzików Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7499-8016

Authors

Tadeusz Oleksiak 

Pracownia Ekonomiki Nasiennictwa i Hodowli Roślin, Zakład Nasiennictwa i Nasionoznawstwa, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — Radzików Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 251
PDF downloads: 29


License

Copyright (c) 2003 Dariusz R. Mańkowski, Tadeusz Oleksiak

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>