Productivity of spring triticale in crop rotation and monoculture

Andrzej Woźniak

dziekanat.agbioinz@up.lublin.pl
Katedra Ogólnej Uprawy Roli i Roślin, Akademia Rolnicza w Lublinie (Poland)

Abstract

The results of productivity of spring triticale cultivated in crop rotation and in monoculture are presented in this paper. It was found that the productivity (dry matter of roots and above ground parts) of spring triticale in crop rotation was significantly higher than that of monoculture at each developmental stages. Share of roots in total dry matter of spring triticale was the highest from tillering to opening of leaf sheets. Cultivation of spring triticale in monoculture caused significant increase of take-all diseases occurrence as well as increase of dry matter of weeds comparing to crop rotation. Further disadvantages of monoculture were reduction of plant stand and productivity of canopy.


Keywords:

crop rotation, monoculture, productivity, spring triticale

Bojarczuk J., Bojarczuk M. 1974. Współdziałanie odmian pszenic ze szczepami grzyba Cercosporella herpotrichoides Fron. Hod. Rośl. Aklim. 18: 313 — 326.
Google Scholar

Czerednik A., Łoboda T., Dalbiak A., Pietkiewicz S., Nalborczyk E. 1997. Analiza wzrostu i struktura plonu różnych morfotypów pszenżyta ozimego (X Triticosecale Wittmack). Zesz. Nauk AR w Szczecinie, 175, Rolnictwo 65: 79 — 84.
Google Scholar

Pałys E. 1977. Dynamika masy korzeniowej i nadziemnej zbóż jarych na glebie wytworzonej z lessów. Praca doktorska AR Lublin.
Google Scholar

Pawłowski F. 1958. Porównanie właściwości fizycznych gleby po pięcioletniej lucernie w mieszankach z trawami i w czystym siewie oraz ich wartości przedplonowej. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio E, vol. XII, 6: 197 — 216.
Google Scholar

Pietola L.M., Laxåback J., Tanni R. 2000. Response of root growth dynamics to a transition to conservation tillage. Mat. 15th Conference of the Inter. Soil Tillage Res. Org. USA. Topic 2: Tillage and Soil Biology/Ecology. Mat. na płycie CD.
Google Scholar

Pokacka Z. 1984. Odporność polowa żyta na choroby podstawy źdźbła. Mat. XXIV sesji nauk. IOR, Poznań: 123 — 154.
Google Scholar

Rozbicki J. 1997. Agrotechniczne uwarunkowania wzrostu, rozwoju i plonowania pszenżyta ozimego. Wyd. Fundacja „Rozwój SGGW”, Warszawa: 1 — 94.
Google Scholar

Ścigalska B. 1997. Plonowanie pszenżyta jarego w pięcioletniej monokulturze i w płodozmianie. Zesz. Nauk. AR w Szczecinie, Rolnictwo 65: 457 — 461.
Google Scholar

Świętochowski B. 1964. Badania nad systemem korzeniowym zbóż. Acta Agrobot. XVI, supl.: 49 — 54.
Google Scholar

Świętochowki B., Gonet Z. 1961. Przyczynek do poznania ilości i składu chemicznego resztek pożniwnych żyta koszonego w różnych terminach. Pam. Puł. 1: 143 — 154.
Google Scholar

Woźniak A. 1999. Kształtowanie się suchej masy pszenżyta jarego uprawianego w płodozmianach i mono-kulturze. Biul. IHAR 212: 103 — 107.
Google Scholar

Woźniak A. 2000. Kształtowanie się suchej masy jęczmienia jarego i pszenicy jarej w różnych fazach rozwojowych. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Ser. E, vol. LV, 3: 23 — 28.
Google Scholar

Zadoks J. C., Chang T. T., Konzak C. F. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14: 415 — 421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x
Google Scholar


Published
2002-03-29

Cited by

Woźniak, A. (2002) “Productivity of spring triticale in crop rotation and monoculture”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (221), pp. 27–34. doi: 10.37317/biul-2002-0085.

Authors

Andrzej Woźniak 
dziekanat.agbioinz@up.lublin.pl
Katedra Ogólnej Uprawy Roli i Roślin, Akademia Rolnicza w Lublinie Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 12
PDF downloads: 8


License

Copyright (c) 2025 Andrzej Woźniak

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)