The comparison of Mexican genotypes and Polish varieties of spring wheat regarding the major yielding traits

Agnieszka Stępień

*@mhr.pl
Małopolska Hodowla Roślin Sp. Z o.o. Oddział w Kobierzycach; Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu (Poland)

Tadeusz Drzazga


Małopolska Hodowla Roślin HBP (Poland)

Renata Galek


Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu (Poland)

Dariusz Zalewski


Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu (Poland)

Ada Biela


Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu (Poland)

Bartosz Kozak


Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu (Poland)

Abstract

Drought is an important limiting factor for crop yield improvement. Therefore, there is a need for more emphasis on selection of breeding material suited for conditions with frequent water deficits. In 2013–2015 field experiments were conducted for selected spring wheat genotypes from CIMMYT (with increased tolerance to drought stress) and varieties from the Polish register: Harendra, Hewilla, Izera, Ostka Smolicka, Torridon, Trappe and Tybalt. Based on the results obtained from the experiments, the mean yield of the years and the phenotypic correlation coefficients between the yield and the functional characteristics were calculated. Negative correlation of yield with heading time was observed. Also negative correlations with yields were found for protein and gluten content and sedimentation. The 2-year average for the yield ranged from 69.7 dt / ha to 107.3 dt / ha. Several lines from CIMMYT yielded at the level of domestic varieties. The CIMMYT lines were characterized by a higher weight of 1000 grains, more favorable initial technological evaluation and a better resistance to fungal diseases.


Keywords:

CIMMYT, correlation, drought, wheat spring, yield

Arnell N. W. 2003. Relative effects of multidecadal climatic variability and changes in the mean and variability of climate due to global warming: future stream flows in Britain. J. Hydrol. 270: 195 — 213.
Google Scholar

Bänziger M., Edmeades G. O., Mickelson H. R., Peńa-Valdivia C. B. 1996. Developing Drought and Low N-Tolerant Maize. Proceedings of a Symposium. March 25–29: 2.
Google Scholar

Briggs K. G. 1997. Badanie i ocena odrębności, wyrównania i trwałości odmian. Wiadomości odmianoznawcze COBORU: 3 — 13.
Google Scholar

Budak H., Kantar M., Kurtoglu K. Y. 2013. Drought tolerance in modern and wild wheat. The Scientific World Journal DOI 548246: 16 p.
Google Scholar

Bombik A., Jankowska J., Starczewski J. 1997. Wpływ czynników meteorologicznych na plonowanie zbóż w warunkach produkcyjnych. Zesz. Nauk. AR Wroc. 313: 27 — 36.
Google Scholar

CIMMYT. 2008. Wheat genetic resources enhancement by the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 55: 1095 — 1140.
Google Scholar

Dupont F. M., Altenbach S. B. 2003. Molecular and biochemical impacts of environmental factors on wheat grain development and protein synthesis. Journal of Cereal Science 38 (2): 133 — 146.
Google Scholar

Easson D. L. White E. M. Pickles S. J. 1973. The effect of weather, seeding rate and variety on loading and yield in winter wheat. J. Agric. Sci. 121: 145 — 156.
Google Scholar

Foulkes M. J., Sylvester-Bradley R., Worland A. J., Snape J. W. 2004. Effects of a photoperiod-response gene Ppd-D1 on yield potential and drought resistance in UK winter wheat. Euphytica 135: 63 — 73.
Google Scholar

Fleury D., Jeeries S., Kuchel H., Langridge P. 2010. Genetic and genomic tools to improve drought tolerance in wheat. J. Ex. Bot. Vol 61. No. 12: 3211 — 3222.
Google Scholar

Górny A. G. 2004. Zarys genetyki zbóż. T. 1. Wydawnictwo IGR Poznań.
Google Scholar

Jaskulski D. 1999. Wpływ terminu siewu i gęstości siewu oraz nawożenia azotem na plonowanie pszenicy jarej w warunkach małej ilości opadów. Pam. Puł. 118: 167 — 172.
Google Scholar

Jedyński S. 2001. Odziedziczalność i analiza ściekowa komponentów plonu pszenicy jarej. Biul. IHAR 218/219: 203 — 209.
Google Scholar

Kundzewicz Z. W. 2011. Zmiany klimatu, ich przyczyny i skutki — obserwacje i projekcje. Landform Analysis 15: 39 — 49.
Google Scholar

Lefebvre V., Kiani S. P., Durand-Tardif M. 2009. A focus on natural variation for abiotic constrains response in the model species Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 10: 3547 — 3582.
Google Scholar

Ługowska B., Banaszak Z. Wójcik Z., Grzmil W. 2004. Zależność plonu ziarna pszenicy ozimej skróconym źdźble od jego składowych. Biul. IHAR 231: 5 — 10.
Google Scholar

Manes Y. Gomez H. F. Puhl L. Reynolds M. Braun H. J. Trethowan R. 2012. Genetic Yield Grains of the CIMMYT International Semi-Arid Wheat Yield Trails from 1994 to 2010. Crop Sci. 52: 1543 — 1552.
Google Scholar

Murphy K. M., Carter A. H., Jones S. S. 2013. Evolutionary Breeding and Climate Change. Genomics and Breeding for Climate — resilient crops. Springer Verlag: 377 — 389.
Google Scholar

Panek K. 1987. Wpływ ilości opadów na plonowanie zbóż w zależności od poziomu nawożenia, zwięzłości gleby i rejonu uprawy. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 314: 119 — 136.
Google Scholar

Pinthus M. J. 1973. Lodging in wheat, barley and oats: The phenomenon its causes and preventative measures, Adv. Agron. 25: 210 — 256.
Google Scholar

Pochaba L., Węgrzyn S. 2000. Zmienność i współzależność kilku cech pszenicy ozimej. Biul. IHAR 216: 261 — 266.
Google Scholar

Reynolds M. P, Saint Pierre C., Saad A. S. I., Vargas M., Condon A. G. 2007. Evaluating potential genetic gains in wheat associated with stress-adaptive trait expression in elite genetic resources under drought and heat stress. Crop Sci. 47: 172 — 189.
Google Scholar

Rozłucki W. 1979. Modernizacja rolnictwa tradycyjnego na przykładzie zielonej rewolucji w Indiach. IGiPZ PAN, 133: 20.
Google Scholar

Rudnicki F., Jaskulski D., Dębowski G. 1999. Reakcje odmian pszenicy jarej na termin siewu i nawożenie azotem w warunkach posusznych. Rocz. Nauk Rol. A 114 (3–4): 97 — 108.
Google Scholar

Singh R. P., Mujeeb-Kazi A., Huerta-Espino J. 1998. Lr46: a gene conferring slow-rusting resistance to leaf rust in wheat. Phytopathology 88: 890 — 894.
Google Scholar

Strebeyko P. 1976. Biologia pszenicy. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Śmiałowski T., Nita Z., Witkowski E. 2006. Ocena współzależności cech pszenicy ozimej na podstawie analizy ścieżek. Biul. IHAR 240/241: 43 — 50.
Google Scholar

Weber R., Hryńczuk B. 2007. Plon i komponenty plonu pszenżyta w zależności od sposobu uprawy roli po wieloletnim odłogu. Fragm. Agron. Vol. 2 No. 94: 381 — 389.
Google Scholar

Weber R., Hryńczuk B. 1999. Reakcja wybranych odmian pszenic jarych na niedobory wody w krytycznych okresach rozwoju. Biul. IHAR 211: 97 — 103.
Google Scholar

Woźniak A. 2006. Wpływ przedplonów na plon i jakość ziarna pszenicy ozimej. Acta Scientiarium Polonorum Vol. 5 No. 2: 99 — 106.
Google Scholar


Published
2017-09-05

Cited by

Stępień, A. (2017) “The comparison of Mexican genotypes and Polish varieties of spring wheat regarding the major yielding traits”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (281), pp. 15–25. doi: 10.37317/biul-2017-0002.

Authors

Agnieszka Stępień 
*@mhr.pl
Małopolska Hodowla Roślin Sp. Z o.o. Oddział w Kobierzycach; Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu Poland

Authors

Tadeusz Drzazga 

Małopolska Hodowla Roślin HBP Poland

Authors

Renata Galek 

Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu Poland

Authors

Dariusz Zalewski 

Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu Poland

Authors

Ada Biela 

Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu Poland

Authors

Bartosz Kozak 

Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 101
PDF downloads: 61


License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.