Comparison of potato varieties in terms of response to inhibitors of sprouting

Zbigniew Czerko

z.czerko@ihar.edu.pl
Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Zakład Przechowalnictwa i Przetwórstwa Ziemniaka, Oddział Jadwisin (Poland)

Kazimiera Zgórska


Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Zakład Przechowalnictwa i Przetwórstwa Ziemniaka, Oddział Jadwisin (Poland)

Magdalena Grudzińska


Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Zakład Przechowalnictwa i Przetwórstwa Ziemniaka, Oddział Jadwisin (Poland)

Abstract

The aim of the experiment was to assess the chemical and natural methods of potato sprout inhibition. Experiment was carried out on the table potato cultivars: Asterix, Gracja, Finezja, Oman, Wiarus. The tubers were stored at 8°C and treated CIPC and “Talent”. One combination was stored at lower temperature (5°C) with no treatment for sprout inhibition. The assessments were carried out in four periods: from January to June. Mass and length of sprouts, weight losses, diseases were determined. The sprout control of potatoes with treatments of CIPC was very good. The potatoes treated with “Talent” were suppressed like CIPC, with an exception of variety Wiarus which had small sprouts. Potatoes stored at 5°C had smaller sprouts than stored at 8°C. Storage of potatoes at a lower temperature (5°C) significantly reduced the germination in relation to storage at 8oC. After treatments with CIPC and “Talent” the greatest reduction of germination were observed on tubers with lower intensity of germination (Finezja, Oman, Gracja). Storage of potatoes at 5°C resulted in a reduction of natural losses in all combinations. Cultivars treated with CIPC and “Talent” during the storage were less infected by diseases than potatoes without treatment.

Supporting Agencies

Research work financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education as a research project 2389/B/P01/2008/35

Keywords:

inhibition, potato, sprouting, storage

Barbier N, Peters J. 2007. Fungicidal effects of carvone. 4th EAPR, Potato Processing Conf. Abstracts of papers and posters, Grantham, 17.01–18.01. 2007, UK: 26 — 27.
Google Scholar

Briddon A., McGoran G., Jina A., Saunders S., Cunnington A., Dunkan H. 2007. Improving CIPC management in bulk-stored potatoes. 4th EAPR, Potato Processing Conf. Abstracts of papers and posters, Grantham, 17.01–18.01. 2007, UK: 28 — 29.
Google Scholar

Burton W. G., Van Es A., Hartmans K. J. 1992. The physic and physiology of storage In: PM Harris (ed.) The potato crop. The Scientific Basis for Improvement. Ed 2 Chapman and Hall, London, UK: 608 — 727.
Google Scholar

Cobb L. J., Blenkisop R. W., Yada R. Y., Marangoni A. Q. 2000. The relationship between respiration and chip colour during long term storage of potato tubers. Amer. J. Potato Res. 279 – 287.
Google Scholar

Czerko Z. 2009. Wpływ odmiany i temperatury przechowywania ziemniaków na wielkość strat masy bulw. Biul. IHAR 254: 159 — 168.
Google Scholar

Czerko Z. 2011. Przechowywalność sześciu odmian ziemniaka uprawianych w latach 2007–2009. Biul. IHAR 262: 127 — 139.
Google Scholar

Daniels-Lake B. J., Prange R. K., Nowak J., Asiedu S. K., Walsh J. R. 2005. Sprout development and processing quality changes in potato tubers stored under ethylene: 1. Effects of ethylene concentration. Am. J. of Potato Res. 82: 389 — 397.
Google Scholar

Danilchenko H., Pranaitiene R., Taraseviciene Z., Venskutoniene E. 2008. The effect of inhibitors on the amino acid content in the stored potato tubers. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln. z. 530: 301 — 316.
Google Scholar

Hartmans K. J., Diepenhorst P., Bakker W., Gorris L. G. M. 1995. The use of carvone in agriculture: sprout suppression of potatoes and antifungal activity against potato tuber and other plant diseases. Industral Crops and Products. 4: 3 — 13.
Google Scholar

Jariene E., Pranaitiene R., Viskelis P., Gołubowska G. 2006. The ecological aspects in the potato tuber storage. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln. z. 511: 523 — 529.
Google Scholar

Kleimnkopf G. E., Oberg N. A., Olsen N. L. 2003. Sprout Inhibition in Storage: current status, new chemistries and natural compounds. Amer. J of Potato Res. 80: 317 — 327.
Google Scholar

McGowan G., Dunkan H., Briddon A., Saunders S., Cunnington A. 2007. Chlorprophanm is more active when applied at warmer temperatures.18th Triennial Conference of the EAPR. Abstracts Oulu, 24.07–29.07. 2011, Finland: 244.
Google Scholar

Lisińska G. 2006. Wartość technologiczna i jakość konsumpcyjna polskich odmian ziemniaka. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 511: 81 — 94.
Google Scholar

Putz B. 2004. Reduzierende Zucker in Kartoffeln. Kartoffelbau 5: 188 — 192.
Google Scholar

Saunders S., Cunnington A., Briddon A G., Dunkan H., Mc Goran 2007. Sprout control by application of CIPC as a vapour. 4th EAPR Potato Processing Conf. Abstracts of papers and posters, Grantham, 17.01 –18.01. 2007, UK: 30 — 31.
Google Scholar

Sowa-Niedziałkowska G. 2004 a. Wpływ odmiany ziemniaka i warunków przechowywania bulw na długość okresu uśpienia i intensywność kiełkowania. Biul. IHAR 232: 23 — 36.
Google Scholar

Sowa-Niedziałkowska G. 2004 b. Wskaźniki procesów życiowych zachodzących w sadzeniakach ziemniaka podczas długotrwałego przechowywania. Część I. Okres uśpienia i intensywność wzrostu kiełków. Biul. IHAR 233: 219 — 236.
Google Scholar

Sowa-Niedziałkowski G., Zgórska K. 2005. Wpływ czynnika termicznego i odmianowego na zmiany ilościowe w czasie długotrwałego przechowywania bulw ziemniaka. Pamiętnik Puławski 139: 233 — 245.
Google Scholar

Zgórska K., Czerko Z. 2006. Rekondycjonowanie bulw przechowywanych w niskiej temperaturze — metoda ograniczająca zawartość cukrów w bulwach ziemniaka. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 511: 547 — 556.
Google Scholar

Zgórska K., Czerko Z. 2008. Reakcja odmian ziemniaka na rekondycjonowanie bulw po przechowywaniu w temperaturach 3–5°C. W: Ziemniak spożywczy i przemysłowy oraz jego przetwarzanie. Szklarska Poręba. 12–15 maja. Materiały: 123 — 124.
Google Scholar


Published
2012-12-31

Cited by

Czerko, Z., Zgórska, K. and Grudzińska, M. (2012) “Comparison of potato varieties in terms of response to inhibitors of sprouting”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (266), pp. 121–130. doi: 10.37317/biul-2012-0012.

Authors

Zbigniew Czerko 
z.czerko@ihar.edu.pl
Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Zakład Przechowalnictwa i Przetwórstwa Ziemniaka, Oddział Jadwisin Poland

Authors

Kazimiera Zgórska 

Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Zakład Przechowalnictwa i Przetwórstwa Ziemniaka, Oddział Jadwisin Poland

Authors

Magdalena Grudzińska 

Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Zakład Przechowalnictwa i Przetwórstwa Ziemniaka, Oddział Jadwisin Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 45
PDF downloads: 44


License

Copyright (c) 2012 Zbigniew Czerko, Kazimiera Zgórska, Magdalena Grudzińska

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.