Variation of spring barley SSD lines in reaction to infection by fungi of the genus Fusarium

Dorota Jasińska


Poznańska Hodowla Roślin Sp. z o.o. (Poland)

Anetta Kuczyńska


Instytut Genetyki Roślin Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Poznań (Poland)

Krzysztof Mikołajczak


Instytut Genetyki Roślin Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Poznań (Poland)

Piotr Ogrodowicz


Instytut Genetyki Roślin Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Poznań (Poland)

Hanna Ćwiek-Kupczyńska


Instytut Genetyki Roślin Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Poznań (Poland)

Magdalena Anioła


Poznańska Hodowla Roślin Sp. z o.o. (Poland)

Krzysztof Rubrycki


Poznańska Hodowla Roślin Sp. z o.o. (Poland)

Róża Mazur


Poznańska Hodowla Roślin Sp. z o.o. (Poland)

Michał Kempa


Instytut Genetyki Roślin Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Poznań (Poland)

Maria Surma


Instytut Genetyki Roślin Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Poznań (Poland)

Tadeusz Adamowski


Instytut Genetyki Roślin Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Poznań (Poland)

Halina Wiśniewska


Instytut Genetyki Roślin Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Poznań (Poland)

Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB), caused by the fungal plant pathogen Fusarium is one of the main biotic stresses in cereals, including barley. Spike infection occurs during and just after flowering, and may result in yield loss, both quantitative and qualitative. Moreover, the accumulation of the mycotoxins in the infected grain is harmful to humans and animals. The aim of the study was to examine the variation in the resistance to FHB of SSD lines of spring barley. The evaluation of susceptibility of the investigated lines to FHB was carried out in two variants: under natural conditions and after inoculation with Fusarium. The proportions of infected spikelets in the spike and infected spikes on the plot were observed, and kernels of the harvested samples were visually scored to determine Fusarium-damaged kernel proportion. The deoxynivalenol content (DON) in grains was assessed by a quantitative immunoenzymatic assay. It was found that an increase of grain infection did not always result in the increased DON accumulation. In addition, the study has allowed identifying barley lines without any visual symptoms of FHB on spikes, which grain showed DON content.

Supporting Agencies

MRiRW HOR hn-501-19/15 Zad. 88

Keywords:

deoxyniwalenol, Fusarium sp., Fusarium head blight index, Fusarium-damaged kernels

Agarwal V. K., Sinclair J. B. 1997. Principles of seed pathology. Second edition CRC Press Inc., Lewis.
Google Scholar

Arseniuk E., Góral T. 2005. Mikotoksyny fuzaryjne w ziarnie zbóż i kukurydzy. Hodowla Roślin i Nasiennictwo 3/2005: 27 — 33.
Google Scholar

Buerstmayr H., Legzdina L., Steiner B., Lemmens M. 2004. Variation for resistance to Fusarium head blight in spring barley. Euphytica 137: 279 — 290.
Google Scholar

Champeil A., Doré T., Fourbet J.F. 2004. Fusarium head blight: Epidemiological origin of the effects of cultural practices on head blight attacks and the production of mycotoxins by Fusar¬ium in wheat grain. Plant Sci. 166: 1389 — 1415.
Google Scholar

Chełkowski J., Gromadzka K., Stępień Ł., Lenc L., Kostecki M., Berthiller F. 2012. Fusarium species, zearalenone and deoxynivalenol content in preharvest wheat heads from Poland. WMJ, 5: 133 — 141.
Google Scholar

Doohan F.M., Brennan J., Cooke B.M. 2003. Influence of climatic factors on Fusarium species pathogenic to cereals. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 109: 755 — 768.
Google Scholar

Kolenda M., Mroczkowski S. 2013. Fusarium mycotoxins and methods of assessing the mycotoxicity: a review. Journal of Central European Agriculture. 14: 169 — 180.
Google Scholar

Lacey J., Bateman G.L., Mirocha C.J. 1999. Effects of infection time and moisture on development of ear blight and deoxynivalenol production by Fusarium spp. in wheat. Ann. Appl. Biol. 134: 277 — 283.
Google Scholar

McMullen M., Bergstrom G.C., DeWolf E., Dill-Macky R., Hershman D., Shaner G., Van Sanford D. 2012. A unified effort to fight an enemy of wheat and barley: Fusarium head blight. Plant Dis. 96(12): 1712 — 1728.
Google Scholar

Mesterhazy A., Bartók T., Mirocha C. G., Komoróczy R. 1999. Nature of wheat resistance to Fusarium head blight and the role of deoxynivalenol for breeding. Plant Breed. 118 (2): 97 — 110.
Google Scholar

Mikołajczak K., Kuczyńska A., Krajewski P., Sawikowska A., Surma M., Ogrodowicz P., Adamski T., Krystkowiak K., Górny A., Kempa M., Szarejko I., Guzy-Wróbelska J., Gudyś K. 2017. Quantitative trait loci for plant height in Maresi × CamB barley population and their associations with yield-related traits under different water regimes. J. Appl. Genet. 58(1): 23 — 35.
Google Scholar

Mikołajczak K., Ogrodowicz P., Gudyś K., Krystkowiak K., Sawikowska A., Frohmberg W., Górny A., Kędziora A., Jankowiak J., Józefczyk D., Karg G., Andrusiak J., Krajewski P., Szarejko I., Surma M., Adamski T., Guzy-Wróbelska J., Kuczyńska A. 2016. Quantitative trait loci for yield and yield-related traits in spring barley populations derived from crosses between European and Syrian cultivars. PlosOne 11 (5): e0155938. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155938.
Google Scholar

Placinta C. M., Mello J. P. F .D., Macdonald A. M. C. 1999. A review of worldwide contamination of cereal grains and animal feed with Fusarium mycotoxins. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 78: 21 — 37.
Google Scholar

Sawinska Z., Blecharczyk A., Małecka-Jankowiak I., Strzelińska J., Grześ S. 2016. Porażenie jęczmienia jarego przez choroby w zależności od następstwa roślin i nawożenia w doświadczeniu wieloletnim. Fragm. Agron. 33(4): 123 — 133.
Google Scholar

Ūsele G., Beinaroviča I., Mežaka I., Legzdiņa L. 2013. Comparison of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) screening methods for Fusarium head blight resistance breeding. Zemdirbyste — Agriculture 100 (3): 317 — 324.
Google Scholar

Warzecha T., Adamski T, Kaczmarek Z., Surma M., Chełkowski J., Wiśniewska H., Krystkowiak K., Kuczyńska A. 2011. Genotype-by-environment interaction of barley DH lines infected with lines infected with Fusarium culmorum (W.G.Sm.) Sacc. Field Crops Res. 120: 21 — 30.
Google Scholar

Zhu H., Gilchrist L., Hayes P., Kleinhofs A., Kudrna D., Liu Z., Prom L., Steffenson B. Toojinda T., Vivar H. 1999. Does function follow form? Principal QTLs for Fusarium head blight (FHB) resistance are coincident with QTLs for inflorescence traits and plant height in a doubled-haploid population of barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 1221 — 1232.
Google Scholar


Published
2018-08-29

Cited by

Jasińska, D. (2018) “Variation of spring barley SSD lines in reaction to infection by fungi of the genus Fusarium ”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (282), pp. 51–61. doi: 10.37317/biul-2017-0014.

Authors

Dorota Jasińska 

Poznańska Hodowla Roślin Sp. z o.o. Poland

Authors

Anetta Kuczyńska 

Instytut Genetyki Roślin Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Poznań Poland

Authors

Krzysztof Mikołajczak 

Instytut Genetyki Roślin Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Poznań Poland

Authors

Piotr Ogrodowicz 

Instytut Genetyki Roślin Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Poznań Poland

Authors

Hanna Ćwiek-Kupczyńska 

Instytut Genetyki Roślin Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Poznań Poland

Authors

Magdalena Anioła 

Poznańska Hodowla Roślin Sp. z o.o. Poland

Authors

Krzysztof Rubrycki 

Poznańska Hodowla Roślin Sp. z o.o. Poland

Authors

Róża Mazur 

Poznańska Hodowla Roślin Sp. z o.o. Poland

Authors

Michał Kempa 

Instytut Genetyki Roślin Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Poznań Poland

Authors

Maria Surma 

Instytut Genetyki Roślin Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Poznań Poland

Authors

Tadeusz Adamowski 

Instytut Genetyki Roślin Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Poznań Poland

Authors

Halina Wiśniewska 

Instytut Genetyki Roślin Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Poznań Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 100
PDF downloads: 70


License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.