Some statistical aspects of the planning of non-orthogonal experiments of split-split-plot type

Katarzyna Ambroży-Deręgowska

katarzyna.ambrozy-deregowska@up.poznan.pl
Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu (Poland)

Iwona Mejza


Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu (Poland)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present a method of constructing incomplete split-split-plot type designs for non-orthogonal experiments with at least three factors. Many methods of constructing incomplete designs are known from the literature, often drawing on the rich theory of block designs. When choosing one or more such designs to generate, for example, an incomplete split-split-plot design, special attention must be paid, inter alia, to the optimal use of the experimental material. Consideration should also be given to the possibility of using control or standard treatments for one or more factors, and the possibility of planning the experiment so that the treatment contrasts most interesting to the researcher are estimated with the greatest precision (efficiency). In this paper, the above considerations are illustrated with reference to a new incomplete split-split-plot design for an experiment with winter wheat. The statistical consequences of planning an experiment with such a design are described. The statistical analysis uses techniques appropriate to multi-stratum experiments, as well as the theory of basic contrasts.


Keywords:

design efficiency, non-orthogonal experiment, partially balanced block design, split-split-plot design

Ambroży K., Mejza I. 2006. Doświadczenia trójczynnikowe z krzyżową i zagnieżdżoną strukturą poziomów czynników. Wyd. PTB i PRODRUK, Poznań.
Google Scholar

Ambroży K., Mejza I. 2012. Modelowanie danych z doświadczeń trójczynnikowych zakładanych w układach zależnych o różnych strukturach blokowych. Biul. IHAR 264: 23 — 31.
Google Scholar

Ambroży K., Mejza I. 2013. A method of constructing incomplete split — split — plot designs supplemented by whole plot and subplot standards and their analysis. Colloquium Biometricum, 43: 59 — 72.
Google Scholar

Caliński, T., Kageyama, S. 2000. Block Designs. A Randomization Approach, Volume I. Analysis. Lecture Notes in Statistics 150, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Google Scholar

Clatworthy W. H. 1973. Tables of two associate classes partially balanced designs. NBS App. Math. Ser. 63, Department of Commerce.
Google Scholar

Nelder J. A. 1965. The analysis of randomized experiments with orthogonal block structure. Proc. of the Royal Society of London, Ser. A, 283: 147 — 178.
Google Scholar

Nigam A. K., Puri P. D. 1982. On partially efficiency balanced designsII. Commun. Statist.- Theor. Meth. 11 (24): 2817 — 2830.
Google Scholar

Pearce S.,C., Caliński T., Marshall T. F. de C. 1974. The basic contrasts of an experimental design with special reference to the analysis of data. Biometrika 54: 449 — 460.
Google Scholar


Published
2014-12-31

Cited by

Ambroży-Deręgowska, K. and Mejza, I. (2014) “Some statistical aspects of the planning of non-orthogonal experiments of split-split-plot type”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (274), pp. 41–49. doi: 10.37317/biul-2014-0004.

Authors

Katarzyna Ambroży-Deręgowska 
katarzyna.ambrozy-deregowska@up.poznan.pl
Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu Poland

Authors

Iwona Mejza 

Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 30
PDF downloads: 28


License

Copyright (c) 2014 Katarzyna Ambroży-Deręgowska, Iwona Mejza

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Similar Articles

<< < 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.