Soybean seed germinattion and seedling growth in response to deterioration and priming: effect of seed size
Amir Moshtaghi-Khavaran
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran (Iran, Islamic Republic of)
Saeid Khomari
saeid.khomari@gmail.comDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran (Iran, Islamic Republic of)
Naser Zare
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran (Iran, Islamic Republic of)
Abstract
A laboratory experiment was conducted to determine if separation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] seeds by size might be effective in germinability of aged and primed seeds and subsequent seedling vigour. A known soybean seed lot was separated into four size classes using round-hole screens. The seed lots were deteriorated by rapid aging and invigorated by hydro- and halo-priming. These pre-treated seeds were planted in rolled paper towels and the results were evaluated according to ISTA rules. The small soybean seeds had higher speed of germination than the other size classes. The seedlings produced from large and medium seeds were longer and heavier than those from other size classes. Our results indicated that the large seeds had less sensitivity to short-term aging condition owing to the number of normal seedlings, while the deterioration more increased the germination time of large and medium seeds, compared to small ones. The alleviatory effects of halo-priming on deterioration of seeds are greater compared with hydro-priming. Although there are some debates, the present data further indicate that larger soybean seeds are susceptible to aging condition.
Keywords:
aging, germination, priming, seed size, soybeanReferences
Aguiar P.A.A. 1974. Some relationships between seed diameter and quality in soybean.Mississipi state Uni-versity, PhD Thesis.
Google Scholar
Ahmad J., Bano M. 1992. The effect of sodium chloride on the physiology of cotyledon and mobilization of reserve food in Cicerarientinum. Pak. J. Bot. 24(1): 40-48.
Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2010. International rules for seed testing. International seed testing association (ISTA), Switzer-land.
Google Scholar
Bailly C., Benamar A., Corbineau F., Come D. 2000. Antioxidant systems in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seeds as affected by priming. Seed Sci. Res. 10: 35-42.
Google Scholar
Barkke M.P., Gradner F.P. 1987. Juvenile growth in pigeonpea, soybean, and cowpea in relation to seed and seedling characteristics. Crop Sci. 27(2): 311-316.
Google Scholar
Basra S.M.A., Ahmad N., Khan M.M., Iqbal N., Cheema M.A. 2003. Assessment of cottonseed deterioration during accelerated aging. Seed Sci. Technol. 31(3):531-540.
Google Scholar
Basra S.M.A., Rehman K.H., Iqbal S. 2000. Cotton seed deterioration: Assessment of some physiological and biochemical aspects. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2(3): 195-198.
Google Scholar
Beckers G.J.M., Conrath U. 2007. Priming for stress resistance: from the lab to the field. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10(4): 425-431.
Google Scholar
Begnami C.N., Cortelazzo A.L. 1996. Cellular alteration during accelerated ageing of French bean seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 24: 295-303.
Google Scholar
Bray C.M. 1995. Biochemical processes during the osmopriming of seeds. In Kigel, J. and Galili, G. (Eds.), Seed Development and Germination (pp. 767-789). New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
Google Scholar
Bruggink G.T., Ooms J.J., Van der Toorn P. 1999. Induction of longevity in primed seeds. Seed Sci. Res. 9(1): 49-53.
Google Scholar
Burris J.S., Edge O.T., Wahab A.H. 1973. Effects of seed size on seedling performance in soybeans: II. Seed-ling growth and photosynthesis and field performance. Crop Sci. 13: 207-210.
Google Scholar
Copeland L.O., McDonald M.B. 1995. Principles of seed science and technology. Chapman and Hall, New York, USA.
Google Scholar
Dalling J.W., Harms K.E., Aizpru A.R. 1997. Seed damage tolerance and seedling resprout ability of Priori-acopaifera in Panama. J. Tropic. Ecol. 13: 617-621.
Google Scholar
Dell’Aquila A., Taranto G. 1986. Cell division and DNA synthesis during osmoconditioning treatment and following germination in aged wheat embryos. Seed Sci. Technol. 14: 333-341.
Google Scholar
Douglas J.E. 1975. Seed storage and packaging. In:FeistritzerWP, (Eds.).Cereal Seed Technol. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Google Scholar
Dourado A.M., Roberts E.H. 1984. Phenotypic mutations induced during storage in barely and pea seed. Ann. Bot. 54: 781-790.
Google Scholar
Edje O.T., Burris J.S. 1971. Effects of soybean seed vigour on field performance. Agron. J. 63: 536-538.
Google Scholar
Ellis R.H., Agrawal P.K., Roose E.E. 1988. Harvesting and storage factors that affect seed quality in pea, lentil, faba bean and chickpea. In: Summerfield RJ (Eds.). Word crops: Cool Season Food Legumes, London.
Google Scholar
Ellis R.H., Roberts E.H. 1981.The quantification of aging and survival in orthodox seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 9: 373-409.
Google Scholar
Farooq M., Shahzad M., Basra A., Wahid V., Ahmad A. 2010. Changes in nutrient-homeostasis and reserves metabolism during rice seed priming: consequences for seedling emergence and growth. Agric. Sci. China 9(2): 191-198.
Google Scholar
Foster S.A. 1986. On adaptive value of large seeds for tropical moist forest trees: a review and synthesis. Bot. Rev. 52: 260-299.
Google Scholar
Fu J.R., Lu X.H., Chen R.Z., Zhang B.Z., Liu Z.S., Ki Z.S., Cai C.Y. 1988. Osmo-conditioning of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) seeds with PEG to improve vigour and some biochemical activities. Seed Sci. Technol. 16: 197-212.
Google Scholar
Gardner F.P., Pearce R.B., Mitchell R.L. 2003. Physiology of crop plants,2th Ed. Scientific Publishers (India), 327 p.
Google Scholar
Ghassemi-Golezani K., Bakhshy J., Raey Y., Hossainzadeh-Mahootchy A. 2010. Seed Vigour and Field Per-formance of Winter Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L.) Cultivars. Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj. 38(3): 146-150.
Google Scholar
Hardegree S.P., Jones T.A., Van Vactor S.S. 2002. Variability in the thermal response of primed and non-primed seeds of squirreltail [Elymuselymoides (Raf.) Swezey and elymusmultisetus (Smith JG.)Jones ME]. Ann. Bot. 89: 311-319.
Google Scholar
Harnowo D. 2004. Effect of time of harvest and seed size on seed quality of soybean. Universiti of Putra Malaysia, PhD Thesis.
Google Scholar
Harris D., Joshi A., Khan P.A., Gothkar P., Sodhi P.S. 1999. On-farm seed priming in semi-arid agriculture: development and evaluation in maize, rice and chickpea in India using participatory methods. Exp. Ag-ric. 35:15-29.
Google Scholar
Helm J.L., Spilde L.A. 1990. Selecting quality seed of cereal grains. NDSU Extension Service, North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science, and U.S. Department of Agriculture Cooperating 701: 231-7881.
Google Scholar
Hoshizaki K., Suzuki W., Sasaki S. 1997. Impacts of secondary seed dispersal and herbivory on seedling survival in Aesculusturbinata. J. Veg. Sci. 8: 735-742.
Google Scholar
Hoy J.D., Gamble E.E. 1985.The effects of seed size and seed density of germination and vigour in soybean. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:1-8.
Google Scholar
Huns J.L., Sung J.M. 1997. Antioxidant role of glutatnione associated with accelerated agina and hydration of tropical Waremelon seeds. Physiol. Plant. 100: 967-974.
Google Scholar
Jain N., Koopar R., Saxena S. 2006. Effect of accelerated ageing on seeds of radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Asian J. Plant Sci. 5: 461-464.
Google Scholar
Khajeh-Hosseini M., Powell A.A., Bingham I.J. 2003.The interaction between salinity stress and seed vigour during germination of soybean seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 31: 715-725.
Google Scholar
Khan A.A., Tao K.L., Knypl S.J., Borkowska B., Powell L.E. 1978. Osmotic conditioning of seeds: Physio-logical and biochemical changes. Acta Hort. 83: 267-278.
Google Scholar
Kitajimak K. 1996. Ecophysiology of tropical tree seedlings.In: Mulkey SS, Chazdon RL, Smith AP (Eds.). Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut.
Google Scholar
Kuc J. 1978. Translocated signals for plant immunization. Ann. New Acad. Sci. 494(1): 221-223.
Google Scholar
Larsen S.U., Andreasen F. 2004. Light and heavy seeds differ in germination percentage and mean germina-tion thermal time. Crop Sci. 44: 1710-1720.
Google Scholar
Lopez-Castaneda C., Richards R., Farquhar G., Williamson R. 1996. Seed and seedling characteristics con-tributing to variation in early vigour among temperate cereals. Crop Sci. 36: 1257-1266.
Google Scholar
Lowe L.B., Rise S.K. 1973. Endosperm protein of wheat seed as a deter minat of seedling growth. Plant Physiol. 51: 57-60.
Google Scholar
McDonald M.B. 1976. A review and evaluation of seed vigour tests. Proc. Assoc. Official Seed Anal. 65: 109-139.
Google Scholar
McDonald M.B. 1999. Seed deterioration: physiology, repair and assessment. Seed Sci. Technol. 27: 177-237.
Google Scholar
McDonald M.B. 2000. Seed priming. In: Black M., Bewley J.D. (Eds.). Sheffield Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Mohammadi G.R. 2009. The effect of seed priming on plant traits of late-spring seeded soybean (Glycine Max L.). Am-Eur. j. Agric. 5: 322-326.
Google Scholar
Morrison M.J., Xue A.G. 2007. The influence of seed size on soybean yield in short-season regions. Can. J. Plant Sci. 87: 89-91.
Google Scholar
Parera C.A., Cantliffe D.J. 1994. Pre-sowing seed priming. J. Hort. Rev. 16: 119-141.
Google Scholar
Perry D.A. 1980. The concept of seed vigour and its relevance to seed production techniques. In: Heb-blethwaite P.D. (Eds.). Seed production. Butterworths, London.
Google Scholar
Powell A.A., Mattews S., Oliveira M. 1984. Seed quality in grain legumes. Adv. App. Biol. 10: 217-284.
Google Scholar
Powell A.A. 1988. Seed vigour and field establishment. Adv. Appl. Biol. 10: 217-284.
Google Scholar
Priestley D.A. 1986. Seed Ageing: Implications for Seed storage and persistence in the soil. Publisher Com-stock Pub Assoc, 304 P.
Google Scholar
Rao N.K., Roberts E.H., Ellis R.H. 1987. Loss of viability in lettuce seeds and the accumulation of chromo-some damage under different storage conditions. Ann. Bot. 60: 85-96.
Google Scholar
Roberts E.H., Osei-Bonsu K. 1988.Seed and seedling vigour. In: Summerfield R.J. (Eds.). World crops: Cool season food legumes. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Google Scholar
Saha R.R., Sultana W. 2008. Influence of seed ageing on growth and yield of soybean. Banglad. J. Bot. 37(1): 21-26.
Google Scholar
Salim M.S., Hossain M., Mamun A.A., Sidiqu M.A. 1985. Yield of maize as affected by seed size and depth of planting . J. Agric. Res. 10(2): 136-141.
Google Scholar
Singh B.G. 1995. Effect of hydration-dehydration seed treatments on vigour and yield of sunflower. Ind. J. Plant Physiol. 38: 66-68.
Google Scholar
Singh I.N., Tripathi S.K., Negi P.S. 1972. Note on the effect of seed size on germination, growgh, and yield of soybean. Ind. J. Agric. Sci. 42:83-86.
Google Scholar
Singh N.I., Seema A., Chauhan J.S. 2009. Effect of seed size on quality within seed lot of pea and correlation of standard germination and vigour with field emergence test. Nature Sci. 7(4): 72-78.
Google Scholar
Sivritepe H.O., Dourado A.M. 1994. The effects of humidification treatments on viability and the accumula-tion of chromosomal aberrations in pea seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 22: 337-348.
Google Scholar
Soltani A., Galeshi S. 2002. Importance of rapid canopy closure for wheat production in a temperate sub-humid environment: experimentation and simulation. Field Crops Res. 77(1): 17-30.
Google Scholar
Soltani A., Gholipoor M., Zeinali E. 2006. Seed reserve utilization and seedling growth of wheat as affected by drought and salinity. J. Environ. Exp. Bot. 55: 195-200.
Google Scholar
Soltani A., Zeinali E., Galeshi S., Latifi N. 2001. Genetic variation for and interrelationships among seed vigour traits in wheat from the Caspian Sea coast of Iran. Seed Sci. Technol. 29(3): 653-662.
Google Scholar
Steiner J.J. 1990. Seedling rate of development index: indicator of vigour and seedling growth response. Crop Sci. 30: 1264-1271.
Google Scholar
Sung F.J.M. 1992. Field emergence of edible soybean seeds differing in seed size and emergence stregth. Seed Sci. Technol. 20: 527-532.
Google Scholar
Thompson K. 1987. Seeds and seed banks. New Phytol. 106(1): 23-34.
Google Scholar
Tomes L.J., Tekrony D.M., Egli D.B. 1988. Factors influencing the tray accelerated ageing test for soybeen seed. J. Seed Technol. 12: 17-53.
Google Scholar
Vieira C. 1966. Effect of seed age on germination and yield of field bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 16: 396-398.
Google Scholar
Westoby M., Jurado E., Leishman M. 1992. Comparative evolutionary ecology of seed size. Trends Ecol. Evolution 7(11): 368-372.
Google Scholar
Authors
Amir Moshtaghi-KhavaranDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran Iran, Islamic Republic of
Authors
Saeid Khomarisaeid.khomari@gmail.com
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran Iran, Islamic Republic of
Authors
Naser ZareDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran Iran, Islamic Republic of
Statistics
Abstract views: 163PDF downloads: 86
License
All articles published in electronic form under CC BY-SA 4.0, in open access, the full content of the licence is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode.pl .
