Recognition and determination of related traits importance with seed yield in chickpea (Cicer aietinum)
Tayebeh Ghorbani
Ghorbani_tayebeh@yahoo.comAgronomy and Plant Breeding Department, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran; No.15- lintang Ilmu 4- Taman Ilmu- Nibong Tebal 14300- Penang Island- Malaysia (Malaysia)
Kianoosh Cheghamirza
Agronomy and Plant Breeding Department, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran; No.15- lintang Ilmu 4- Taman Ilmu- Nibong Tebal 14300- Penang Island- Malaysia (Malaysia)
Kosar Bardideh
Agronomy and Plant Breeding Department, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran; No.15- lintang Ilmu 4- Taman Ilmu- Nibong Tebal 14300- Penang Island- Malaysia (Malaysia)
Parastoo Basiri Shoar
Agronomy and Plant Breeding Department, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran; No.15- lintang Ilmu 4- Taman Ilmu- Nibong Tebal 14300- Penang Island- Malaysia (Malaysia)
Abstract
To study the relationship between seed yield and its components 5 varieties and 18 different genotypes of Cicer arietinum were evaluated. This study was carried out under dryland farming during 2007 in research farm of Razi university. Path analysis showed that in the first level of yield, the highest direct effect was related to biological yield and the highest indirect effect was related to seed number per plant due to biological yield. In second level of yield due to the seed number per plant double seed pod number had the highest direct effect and the highest indirect effect was related to hundreds seed weight due to double the seed pod number. In second level of yield due to biological yield, the highest direct effect was related to high plant and the highest indirect effect was related to high plant due to second branch number. In the third level of yield due to a hundred seed weight, the highest direct effect was related to pod diameter and the highest indirect effect was related to pod length due to pod diameter. Factor analysis showed that 5 factors explained 81.65 percent of the variance. Cluster analysis based on ward method were arranged genotypes in 3 clusters.
Keywords:
chickpea, factor analysis and cluster analysis, path analysis, yield, yield componentsReferences
Aghaei, M., Mirakhorli, Vaezi, A. Sh. Khuhpaigani, A. 2005. Potential of genetic diversity in Iranian Chickpea collection. Of the first Pulses congress, 2005. Ferdosi university of Mashhad.
Google Scholar
Hamzeh, Sh. 2004. Optimizing regeneration of chickpea and investigation of the possibilities of reporter gene (GUS) transformation of chickpea. Msc thesis, Razi university of Kermanshah.
Google Scholar
Iqbal, S. M., Ghafoor, A. Ayub, N. Ahmad, Z. 2004. Pathogenic diversity in ascochytarabiei isolates collected from Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot., 36(2): 429-437.
Google Scholar
Kamel M., Moradi, P. 2008. Determination of traits effective on seed yield of 36 lines of Chickpea in Northwest provinces of Iran in Dryland conditions. Seed and plant improvement journal 24: 347-357.
Google Scholar
Kanouni H. 2003. Study of seed yield and some associated characteristics in chickpea under drought stress conditions of Kurdistan. Iranian journal of crop science. 5(2): 148-154.
Google Scholar
Khan, I. A., Imtiaz, S., Malik, B. A. 1991. Selection of diverse parents of chickpea (Cicerarietinum L.) by multivariate analysis and degree of heterosis of their F1 hybrids.
Google Scholar
Moreno, M. T. Cubero, J. I. 1978. Variation in CicerarietinumL. Euphytica, 27( 2): 465-485.
Google Scholar
Narayan, R. K. J. Macefield, A. J. 1976. Adaptive responses and genetic divergence in a world germplasm collection of chick pea (Cicerarietinum L.). Theoretical and applied genetics, 47 (4): 179-187.
Google Scholar
Pirdadeh biranvand H. 2005. Diallel analysis in Chickpea lines. Msc thesis, Razi university of Kermanshah.
Google Scholar
Porsa, H., Nezami, A. Bagheri, A. Mohammadabadi, A. A. Rastegar, J. 2003. Effects of a fall and winter planting dates on morphological characteristics, yield and yield components of Chickpea under irrigated condition of Khorasan (Nishabur). Journal of agricultural sciences and natural resources (38). ISSN 1028-3099.
Google Scholar
Soltani, A., Rasam, Gh. 2007. Optimizing management Chickpea production in dry farming conditions using computer simulations. The second national conference on agricultural land knowledge about Iran.
Google Scholar
Toker, G. Cagirgan, M. I. 2004. The use of phenotypic correlations and factor analysis in determining the characters for grain yield selection in chickpea (Cicerarietinum L.). Hereditas. 140: 226-228.
Google Scholar
Vural, H. Karasu, A. 2007. Variability studies in chickpea (Cicerarietunum L.) varieties grown in Isparta, Turkey. Revista UDO Agrícola, 7 (1): 35-40.
Google Scholar
Authors
Tayebeh GhorbaniGhorbani_tayebeh@yahoo.com
Agronomy and Plant Breeding Department, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran; No.15- lintang Ilmu 4- Taman Ilmu- Nibong Tebal 14300- Penang Island- Malaysia Malaysia
Authors
Kianoosh CheghamirzaAgronomy and Plant Breeding Department, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran; No.15- lintang Ilmu 4- Taman Ilmu- Nibong Tebal 14300- Penang Island- Malaysia Malaysia
Authors
Kosar BardidehAgronomy and Plant Breeding Department, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran; No.15- lintang Ilmu 4- Taman Ilmu- Nibong Tebal 14300- Penang Island- Malaysia Malaysia
Authors
Parastoo Basiri ShoarAgronomy and Plant Breeding Department, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran; No.15- lintang Ilmu 4- Taman Ilmu- Nibong Tebal 14300- Penang Island- Malaysia Malaysia
Statistics
Abstract views: 106PDF downloads: 43
License
All articles published in electronic form under CC BY-SA 4.0, in open access, the full content of the licence is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode.pl .
