Assessing the breeding value of nine spring field pea (Pisum sativumL.) cultivars
Valentin Kosev
valkosev@hotmail.comInstitute of Forage Crops – Pleven, Gen.Vladimir Vazov 89 street, 5800 Pleven , Bulgaria (Bulgaria)
I. Pachev
Institute of Forage Crops – Pleven, Gen.Vladimir Vazov 89 street, 5800 Pleven , Bulgaria (Bulgaria)
Aleksandar Mikić
Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Forage Crops Department, Maksima Gorkog 30 21000, Novi Sad, Serbia (Serbia)
Abstract
The investigation was performed during the period 2007-2009 in the second experimental field of institute of Forage Crops, Pleven. Were studies follow varieties: Kristal, Picardi, Amitie, Druzba, Kerpo, Usatii 90, Rezonator, Harkovskii atalon. The variety Pleven 4 was used as a standard. According to the obtained experimental data the varieties could be classified to different groups on earliness. Early are Picardi, Amitie and Harkovskii atalonn with earliness coefficient 1.00, mid – early is Kerpo 1.38 – 1.57 and late varieties Kristal, Druzba, Pleven 4, Usatii 90, Rezonator. Harkovskii atalon is characterized with high lodging resistance only 28.61% from plants are lodging susceptible and it could be including in the future hybridization as donor of essential characters. With highest seed yield are Harkovskii atalonn (207.17 kg × da-1), Kerpo (206.08 kg × da-1) and Usatii 90 (203.33 kg × da-1) what opportunity to be included in breeding programs for high yield varieties.
Keywords:
forage pea, yield, earliness, productivityReferences
Acikgoz E, Ustun A, I. Gul I, Anlarsal E, Tekeli AS, Nizam I, Avcýoglu R, Geren H, Cakmakci S, Aydinoglu, B, Yucel C, Avci M, Acar Z, Ayan I, Uzun A, Bilgili U, Sincik M and M. Yavuz (2009) Genotype ×environment interaction and stability analysis for dry matter and seed yield in field pea (Pisum sativum L.), Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 7 (1): 96-106.
Google Scholar
Angelova S and Stoilova T (2008) Maintenance, enrichment and utilization of grain legume collections in Bulgaria. Eds: ISHS, Acta Horticulturae, Number 830. Proceedings of the Fourth Balkan Symposium on Vegetables and Potatoes vol. 2, p.695-699.
Google Scholar
Bilgili U, Sincik M, Uzun A and Acikgoz E (2001) The effects of supplemental lighting and light density on plant growing of pea (Pisum sativum L.) in greenhouse conditions, 4th Turkey Field Crops Congress, 17- 21, Grassland and Forage Crops, Tekirdag, PAYMAS Press, Istanbul, Turkey:, p.117-21.
Google Scholar
Bourion V, Duparque M, Munier-Jolain N, Lejeune-Henaut I (1998) Genetic variability of development rates in pea (Pisum sativum L.). 3rd European conference on grain legumes, p.192-193.
Google Scholar
Bretting PK and Widrlechner MP (1995) Genetic Markers and Plant Genetic Resources, Plant Breed. Rev vol. 13: 11–86.
Google Scholar
Kalapchieva S (2002) Variability of quantitative traits of the varieties and lines garden pea. Scientifi c Reports of the Scientifi c Session of Jubilee – 120 Years of Agriculture Science in Sadovo, IPGR “Konstantin Malkov” Sadovo-Plovdiv, Bulgaria 21-22 Маy 2002, p. 264-267.
Google Scholar
Kalapchieva S (2007) Kalapchieva Sl. Study of garden peas varieties originated from Germany and possibilities for their using as an initial breeding material, Plant science 44:.406-409.
Google Scholar
Kuzmova К (2002a) Kolichestvena otsenka na zimni i proletni sortove grah po stepen na ranozrelost. Scientifi c Reports of the Scientifi c Session of Jubilee – 120 Years of Agriculture Science in Sadovo, IPGR “Konstantin Malkov”, Sadovo-Plovdiv Bulgaria 21-22 Маy 2002, p.109-112.
Google Scholar
Kuzmova К (2002b) Svetovni agroklimatichni analozi s Balgariya po usloviyata za otglezhdane na graham. Scientifi c Reports of the Scientifi c Session of Jubilee – 120 Years of Agriculture Science in Sadovo, IPGR “Konstantin Malkov”, Sadovo-Plovdiv, Bulgaria 21-22 Маy 2002, p.113-118.
Google Scholar
Lidanski, Т., N. Naidenova. 1993. Plasticity and stability of mutants pea (Pisum sativum). GENETICS and BREEDING 4, pp. 268-275.
Google Scholar
Mckenzie DB and Spooner D (1999) White lupin: An alternative to pea in oat-legume forage mixtures grown in New Foundland. Can J Plant Sci 79: 43-47.
Google Scholar
McPhee K (2003) Dry pea production and breeding - A mini review, Food, Agriculture and Environment Vol.1 (1): 64-69.
Google Scholar
Mehandjiev A, Mihov M, Noveva S, Rodeva R, Kosturkova G (2006) Some results from the investigation on genetic improvement of Pea (Pisum sativum L), Field Crops studies, Vol.III, №3, Dobrudja Agricultural institute: 397-403.
Google Scholar
Mihailovic V, Ellis THN, Duc G, Lejeune-Hénaut I, Étévé G, Angelova S, Mikic A, Cupina B (2008) Grain yield in winter and spring protein pea cultivars (Pisum sativum L.) with normal and afila leaf types. International conference “Conventional and molecular breeding of field and vegetable crops Novi Sad 24 -27 November 2008, p.443-447.
Google Scholar
Mihailović V, Mikić A (20040 Leaf type and grain yield in forage pea, Genetika Vol.36, №1, 31-38.
Google Scholar
Nisar M, Ghafoor A, Khan MR and Asmatullah (2009) First Proteomic Assay of Pakistani Pisum sativum L. Germplasm Relation to Geographic Pattern. Russian Journal of Genetics Vol. 45, No. 7, p. 807–812.
Google Scholar
Pachev I, Kertikov T, Kertikova D (2008) Study of productive capacities of Ukrainian cultivars of spring forage pea in the conditions of Bulgaria. International conference “Conventional and molecular breeding of field and vegetable crops Novi Sad, 24-27 November 2008 p.426-430.
Google Scholar
Sharma S, Daramwal NS, Sharama CR and Upadhyay RG (2001) Influence of various doses of N and P on protein content, yield and its attributes of mungbean (Vigna radiata). International Journal of Research on Crops 2 (2): 108-111.
Google Scholar
Skubisz G (2002) Method for the determination of the mechanical properties of pea stems, Int. Agrophysics 16: 73-77.
Google Scholar
Tamkoc А, Ustun A, Altinok S, Acikgoz E (2009) Biomass and seed yield stability of pea genotypes, Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment Vol.7 (1):140-146.
Google Scholar
Tar’an B, Warkentin T, Somers D, Miranda D, Vandenberg A, Blade S, Woods S, Bing D, Xue A, DeKoeyer D and Penner G (2003) Quantitative trait loci for lodging re sistance, plant height and partial resistance to mycosphaerella blight in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 107:1482-1491.
Google Scholar
Tekeli A and Ates SE (2003) Yield and its components in field pea (Pisum arvenseL.) Lines,Jurnal of Central European Agriculture (online) Vol. 4, №4: 313-317.
Google Scholar
Yurevich Sth (2008) Selection value of no traditional morphotypes pisum sativum, Doctoral Thesis. The All- Russia Research Institute of Legumes and Groat Crops. Briansk, Russia.
Google Scholar
Zhang C, Tar’an B, Warkentin TD, Tullu A, Bett KE, Vandenberg A and Somers DJ (2006) Selection for Lodging Resistance in Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) using molecular markers. Crop Sci. 46:321-329.
Google Scholar
Zhang Ch (2004) Implementation of Marker-Assisted Selection For Lodging Resistance in Pea Breeding, Thesis, University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada.
Google Scholar
Authors
Valentin Kosevvalkosev@hotmail.com
Institute of Forage Crops – Pleven, Gen.Vladimir Vazov 89 street, 5800 Pleven , Bulgaria Bulgaria
Authors
I. PachevInstitute of Forage Crops – Pleven, Gen.Vladimir Vazov 89 street, 5800 Pleven , Bulgaria Bulgaria
Authors
Aleksandar MikićInstitute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Forage Crops Department, Maksima Gorkog 30 21000, Novi Sad, Serbia Serbia
Statistics
Abstract views: 135PDF downloads: 36
License
All articles published in electronic form under CC BY-SA 4.0, in open access, the full content of the licence is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode.pl .