Assessing the breeding value of nine spring field pea (Pisum sativumL.) cultivars

Valentin Kosev

valkosev@hotmail.com
Institute of Forage Crops – Pleven, Gen.Vladimir Vazov 89 street, 5800 Pleven , Bulgaria (Bulgaria)

I. Pachev


Institute of Forage Crops – Pleven, Gen.Vladimir Vazov 89 street, 5800 Pleven , Bulgaria (Bulgaria)

Aleksandar Mikić


Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Forage Crops Department, Maksima Gorkog 30 21000, Novi Sad, Serbia (Serbia)


Abstract

The investigation was performed during the period 2007-2009 in the second experimental field of institute of Forage Crops, Pleven. Were studies follow varieties: Kristal, Picardi, Amitie, Druzba, Kerpo, Usatii 90, Rezonator, Harkovskii atalon. The variety Pleven 4 was used as a standard. According to the obtained experimental data the varieties could be classified to different groups on earliness. Early are Picardi, Amitie and Harkovskii atalonn with earliness coefficient 1.00, mid – early is Kerpo 1.38 – 1.57 and late varieties Kristal, Druzba, Pleven 4, Usatii 90, Rezonator. Harkovskii atalon is characterized with high lodging resistance only 28.61% from plants are lodging susceptible and it could be including in the future hybridization as donor of essential characters. With highest seed yield are Harkovskii atalonn (207.17 kg × da-1), Kerpo (206.08 kg × da-1) and Usatii 90 (203.33 kg × da-1) what opportunity to be included in breeding programs for high yield varieties.


Keywords:

forage pea, yield, earliness, productivity

Acikgoz E, Ustun A, I. Gul I, Anlarsal E, Tekeli AS, Nizam I, Avcýoglu R, Geren H, Cakmakci S, Aydinoglu, B, Yucel C, Avci M, Acar Z, Ayan I, Uzun A, Bilgili U, Sincik M and M. Yavuz (2009) Genotype ×environment interaction and stability analysis for dry matter and seed yield in field pea (Pisum sativum L.), Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 7 (1): 96-106.
Google Scholar

Angelova S and Stoilova T (2008) Maintenance, enrichment and utilization of grain legume collections in Bulgaria. Eds: ISHS, Acta Horticulturae, Number 830. Proceedings of the Fourth Balkan Symposium on Vegetables and Potatoes vol. 2, p.695-699.
Google Scholar

Bilgili U, Sincik M, Uzun A and Acikgoz E (2001) The effects of supplemental lighting and light density on plant growing of pea (Pisum sativum L.) in greenhouse conditions, 4th Turkey Field Crops Congress, 17- 21, Grassland and Forage Crops, Tekirdag, PAYMAS Press, Istanbul, Turkey:, p.117-21.
Google Scholar

Bourion V, Duparque M, Munier-Jolain N, Lejeune-Henaut I (1998) Genetic variability of development rates in pea (Pisum sativum L.). 3rd European conference on grain legumes, p.192-193.
Google Scholar

Bretting PK and Widrlechner MP (1995) Genetic Markers and Plant Genetic Resources, Plant Breed. Rev vol. 13: 11–86.
Google Scholar

Kalapchieva S (2002) Variability of quantitative traits of the varieties and lines garden pea. Scientifi c Reports of the Scientifi c Session of Jubilee – 120 Years of Agriculture Science in Sadovo, IPGR “Konstantin Malkov” Sadovo-Plovdiv, Bulgaria 21-22 Маy 2002, p. 264-267.
Google Scholar

Kalapchieva S (2007) Kalapchieva Sl. Study of garden peas varieties originated from Germany and possibilities for their using as an initial breeding material, Plant science 44:.406-409.
Google Scholar

Kuzmova К (2002a) Kolichestvena otsenka na zimni i proletni sortove grah po stepen na ranozrelost. Scientifi c Reports of the Scientifi c Session of Jubilee – 120 Years of Agriculture Science in Sadovo, IPGR “Konstantin Malkov”, Sadovo-Plovdiv Bulgaria 21-22 Маy 2002, p.109-112.
Google Scholar

Kuzmova К (2002b) Svetovni agroklimatichni analozi s Balgariya po usloviyata za otglezhdane na graham. Scientifi c Reports of the Scientifi c Session of Jubilee – 120 Years of Agriculture Science in Sadovo, IPGR “Konstantin Malkov”, Sadovo-Plovdiv, Bulgaria 21-22 Маy 2002, p.113-118.
Google Scholar

Lidanski, Т., N. Naidenova. 1993. Plasticity and stability of mutants pea (Pisum sativum). GENETICS and BREEDING 4, pp. 268-275.
Google Scholar

Mckenzie DB and Spooner D (1999) White lupin: An alternative to pea in oat-legume forage mixtures grown in New Foundland. Can J Plant Sci 79: 43-47.
Google Scholar

McPhee K (2003) Dry pea production and breeding - A mini review, Food, Agriculture and Environment Vol.1 (1): 64-69.
Google Scholar

Mehandjiev A, Mihov M, Noveva S, Rodeva R, Kosturkova G (2006) Some results from the investigation on genetic improvement of Pea (Pisum sativum L), Field Crops studies, Vol.III, №3, Dobrudja Agricultural institute: 397-403.
Google Scholar

Mihailovic V, Ellis THN, Duc G, Lejeune-Hénaut I, Étévé G, Angelova S, Mikic A, Cupina B (2008) Grain yield in winter and spring protein pea cultivars (Pisum sativum L.) with normal and afila leaf types. International conference “Conventional and molecular breeding of field and vegetable crops Novi Sad 24 -27 November 2008, p.443-447.
Google Scholar

Mihailović V, Mikić A (20040 Leaf type and grain yield in forage pea, Genetika Vol.36, №1, 31-38.
Google Scholar

Nisar M, Ghafoor A, Khan MR and Asmatullah (2009) First Proteomic Assay of Pakistani Pisum sativum L. Germplasm Relation to Geographic Pattern. Russian Journal of Genetics Vol. 45, No. 7, p. 807–812.
Google Scholar

Pachev I, Kertikov T, Kertikova D (2008) Study of productive capacities of Ukrainian cultivars of spring forage pea in the conditions of Bulgaria. International conference “Conventional and molecular breeding of field and vegetable crops Novi Sad, 24-27 November 2008 p.426-430.
Google Scholar

Sharma S, Daramwal NS, Sharama CR and Upadhyay RG (2001) Influence of various doses of N and P on protein content, yield and its attributes of mungbean (Vigna radiata). International Journal of Research on Crops 2 (2): 108-111.
Google Scholar

Skubisz G (2002) Method for the determination of the mechanical properties of pea stems, Int. Agrophysics 16: 73-77.
Google Scholar

Tamkoc А, Ustun A, Altinok S, Acikgoz E (2009) Biomass and seed yield stability of pea genotypes, Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment Vol.7 (1):140-146.
Google Scholar

Tar’an B, Warkentin T, Somers D, Miranda D, Vandenberg A, Blade S, Woods S, Bing D, Xue A, DeKoeyer D and Penner G (2003) Quantitative trait loci for lodging re sistance, plant height and partial resistance to mycosphaerella blight in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 107:1482-1491.
Google Scholar

Tekeli A and Ates SE (2003) Yield and its components in field pea (Pisum arvenseL.) Lines,Jurnal of Central European Agriculture (online) Vol. 4, №4: 313-317.
Google Scholar

Yurevich Sth (2008) Selection value of no traditional morphotypes pisum sativum, Doctoral Thesis. The All- Russia Research Institute of Legumes and Groat Crops. Briansk, Russia.
Google Scholar

Zhang C, Tar’an B, Warkentin TD, Tullu A, Bett KE, Vandenberg A and Somers DJ (2006) Selection for Lodging Resistance in Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) using molecular markers. Crop Sci. 46:321-329.
Google Scholar

Zhang Ch (2004) Implementation of Marker-Assisted Selection For Lodging Resistance in Pea Breeding, Thesis, University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada.
Google Scholar

Download


Published
2013-12-19

Cited by

Kosev, V., Pachev, I., & Mikić, A. (2013). Assessing the breeding value of nine spring field pea (Pisum sativumL.) cultivars. Plant Breeding and Seed Science, 68, 55–64. Retrieved from http://ojs.ihar.edu.pl/index.php/pbss/article/view/293

Authors

Valentin Kosev 
valkosev@hotmail.com
Institute of Forage Crops – Pleven, Gen.Vladimir Vazov 89 street, 5800 Pleven , Bulgaria Bulgaria

Authors

I. Pachev 

Institute of Forage Crops – Pleven, Gen.Vladimir Vazov 89 street, 5800 Pleven , Bulgaria Bulgaria

Authors

Aleksandar Mikić 

Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Forage Crops Department, Maksima Gorkog 30 21000, Novi Sad, Serbia Serbia

Statistics

Abstract views: 135
PDF downloads: 36


License

All articles published in electronic form under CC BY-SA 4.0, in open access, the full content of the licence is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode.pl .