ABA SENSITIVITY AS A CRITERION FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE IN WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) CULTIVARS

Abdul Razzaq

shahzahid578@hotmail.com
Crop Physiology Lab, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 (Pakistan)

Madiha Rashid


Crop Physiology Lab, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 (Pakistan)

Talal Ahmad Shfique


Crop Physiology Lab, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 (Pakistan)

Abdul Hafeez


Crop Physiology Lab, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 (Pakistan)

Hafiz Muhammad Jhanzab


Crop Physiology Lab, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 (Pakistan)

Ghulam Shabir


Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 (Pakistan)

Zahid Hussain Shah


Department of Arid Land Agriculture, King Abdul Aziz University Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. PC –21577 (Saudi Arabia)


Abstrakt

Criteria used for evaluating drought tolerance of wheat cultivars demanding more time and efforts are usually not efficient and conclusive. Present study was conducted to evaluate ABA sensitivity as a criterion for evaluating drought tolerance of wheat cultivars at an early stage. Ten cultivars of wheat were subjected to drought at 3-leaf stage to select the most sensitive and two tolerant cultivars using mortality rate. Tatara was found the most susceptible whereas GA-2002 and Chakwal-50 were the cultivars with maximum drought tolerance. These cultivars were used to study sensitivity to applied absicic acid (based on germination index and relative growth inhibition rate) and physiological responses (leaf water content, chlorophyll stability index, coefficient of relative inhibition and proline accumulation) under drought stress. Highest ABAsensitivity was recorded in GA-2002 and Chakwal-50 whereas Tatara manifested minimum sensitivity. ABAsensitivity corresponded to physiological indices of drought tolerance. Results show that ABA-sensitivity is an efficient criterion that can be used to evaluate drought tolerance of wheat cultivars at early stage.


Słowa kluczowe:

ABA, chlorophyll, inhibition, proline

Almeselmani, M. 2011. Effect of Drought on Different Physiological Characters and Yield Component in Different Varieties of Syrian Durum Wheat. J. Agric. Sci. 3 (3)
Google Scholar

Bajji, M., S. Lutts, and J. M. Kinet. 2000. Physiological changes after exposure to and recovery from polyethylene glycol-induced water deficit in callus cultures issued from durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) cultivars differing in drought resistance. J. Plant Physiol. 156 (1): 75-83
Google Scholar

Balla, K., Z. Bed and O. Veisz. 2006. Effect of heat and Drought stress on the photosynthetic processes of wheat. Cereal Research Communications. 34 (1): 381-385
Google Scholar

Bayoumi, T. Y., M. H. Eid and E. M. Metwali. 2008. Application of physiological and biochemical indices as a screening technique for drought tolerance in wheat genotypes. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 7: 2341-2352.
Google Scholar

Cornic, G. 2000. Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal aperture not by affecting ATP synthesis. Trends Plant Sci. 5: 187-198.
Google Scholar

Cutler, S., M. Ghassemian, D. Bonetta, S. Cooney and P. McCourt. 1996. Science 273: 1239-41.
Google Scholar

Delauney, A. J. and D. P. S. Verma. 1993. Proline biosynthesis and osmoregulation in plants. Plant J. 4: 215- 223.
Google Scholar

Dhanda, S.S., G.S. Sethi and R. K. Behl. 2004. Indices of drought tolerance in wheat genotypes at early stages of plant growth. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 190 (1): 6-12.
Google Scholar

Errabii, T., C.B. Gandonou, H. Essalmani, J. Abrini, M. Idomar and N.S. Senhaji. 2006. Proline and ion accumulation in sugarcane callus cultures under drought-induced osmotic stress and its subsequent relief. Afri. J. Biotechnol. 5: 1148-1493.
Google Scholar

Finkelstein, R., S.I. Gibson. 2002. ABA and sugar interactions regulating development: “cross-talk” or “voices in a crowd”. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 5:26–32.
Google Scholar

Guoth, A., I. Tari, A. Galle, J. Csiszar, A. Pecsvaradi, L. Cseuz and L. Erdei. 2009. Comparison of the drought stress responses of tolerant and sensitive wheat cultivars during grain filling: changes in flag leaf photosynthetic activity, ABA levels and grain yield. J. Plant Growth Reg. 28: 167–176.
Google Scholar

Gunes A., D. Pilbeam, A. Inal. and S. Coban. 2008. Influence of silicon on sunflower cultivars under drought stress, I: Growth, antioxidant mechanisms and lipid peroxidation. Commun. Soil Sci. Pl. Nutr. 39: 1885– 1903.
Google Scholar

Kavi K., S. Sangam, R.N. Amrutha, P.S. Laxmi, K.R. Naidu, K.R.S.S. Rao, S. Rao, K.J. Reddy, P. Theriappan and N. Sreenivasulu. 2005. Regulation of proline biosynthesis, degradation, uptake and transport in higher plants: its implications in plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance. Curr. Sci. 88: 424–438.
Google Scholar

Khanna-Chopra, R. and D. S. Selote. 2007. Acclimation to drought stress generates oxidative stress tolerance in drought resistant than susceptible wheat cultivar under field conditions. Environ. Exp. Bot. 60: 276– 283.
Google Scholar

Kobayashi, F., S. Takumi and C. Nakamura. 2008. Increased freezing tolerance in an ABA-hypersensitive mutant of common wheat. J. Plant Physiol. 165: 224-32.
Google Scholar

Kurahashi, Y., A. Terashima and S. Takumi. 2009. Variation in Dehydration Tolerance, ABA Sensitivity and Related Gene Expression Patterns in D-Genome Progenitor and Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat Lines. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 10: 2733-2751.
Google Scholar

Nyachiro, J.M., F. R. Clarke, R. M. DePauw, R. E. Knox and K. C. Armstrong. 2002. The effects of cis-trans ABA on embryo germination and seed dormancy in wheat. Euphytica., 126: 129–133.
Google Scholar

Qayyum, A., A. Razzaq, M. Ahmad and M.A. Jenks. 2011. Water stress causes differential effects on germination indices, total soluble sugar and proline content in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. African. J. Biotech., 10 (64): 14038-14045.
Google Scholar

Raikhel, N.V., B.A. Palevitz and C.H. Haigler. (1986). Absicic acid control of lectin accumulation in wheat seedling and callus culture: effect of exogenous ABA and flouridone. Plant Physiol. 80: 167-171.
Google Scholar

Ramesh, H., and P. Devasenapathy. 2006. Physiological Response of Cowpea in a Rainfed Alfisol Ecosystem to the Impulse of Soil Moisture Conservation Practices. Gen. Appl. Plant Physiol. 32 (3-4): 181-190.
Google Scholar

Reddy, L.V., R. J. Metzger and T. M. Ching. 1985. Effect of temperature on seed dormancy of wheat. Crop Sci. 25: 455–458
Google Scholar

Sanchez-Rodriguez, E., M. Rubio-Wilhelmi, L. M. Cervilla, B. Blasco, J. J. Rios, M. A. Rosales, L. Romero and J. M. Ruiz. 2010. Genotypic differences in some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress under moderate drought in tomato plants. Plant Sci. 178: 30-40.
Google Scholar

Schramm E., J. Abellera, L. Strader, K.G. Campbell and C.M. Steber. 2008. Can ABA signaling be used to develop drought tolerant wheat. The 11th International Wheat Genetics Symposium proceedings, Ed, Rudi Appels Russell Eastwood Evans Lagudah Peter Langridge Michael Mackay Lynne. Washington State University.
Google Scholar

Shao, L., L.T. Young and J.F. Wang. 2005. Chronic treatment with mood stabilizers lithium and valproate prevents excitotoxicity by inhibiting oxidative stress in rat cerebral cortical cells. Biol. Psychiatry. 58: 879–84.
Google Scholar

Siddique, M.R.B., A. Hamid and M.S. Islam. 2000. Drought stress effects on water relation of wheat. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin., 41 (1): 35-39.
Google Scholar

Tas, S., and T. Birol. 2007. Some Physiological Responses of Drought Stress in Wheat Genotypes with Different Ploidity in Turkiye. World J. Agric. Sci. 3 (2): 178-183.
Google Scholar

Tatar, O. and M. N. Gevrek. 2008. Influence of water stress on proline accumulation, lipid peroxidation and water content of wheat. Asian J. Plant Sci. 7(4): 409-412.
Google Scholar

Thomas, T. L., J. Vivekananda and M. A. Bogue. 1991. ABA regulation of gene expression in embryos and mature plants. In: W.J. Davies & H.G. Jones (Eds.), Abscisic Acid Physiology and Biochemistry, Environmental Plant Biology Series, Bios Scientific Publishers, Oxford, UK. pp. 125–135
Google Scholar

Turner, N. C., and M. M. Jones. 1980. Turgor maintenance by osmotic adjustment. In: Adaptations of plants to water and high temperature stress. Turner NC, Kramer PG (eds). John Wiley, New York., pp. 87-103.
Google Scholar

Valentovic, P., M. Luxova, L. Kolarovic and O. Gasparikova. 2006. Effect of osmotic stress on compatible solutes content, membrane stability and water relations in two maize cultivars. Plant Soil Environ. 4: 186-191.
Google Scholar

Vendruscolo, A.C. G., I. Schuster, M. Pileggi, C. A. Scapim, H.B.C. Molinar, C. J. Marur and L. G. C. Vieira. 2007. Stress-induced synthesis of praline confers tolerance to water deficit in transgenic wheat. J. Plant. Physiol. 164(10): 1367-1376.
Google Scholar

Wang, Y., J. Ying, M. Kuzma, M. Chalifoux, A. Sample, C. McArthur, T. Uchacz, C. Sarvas, J. Wan, D. T.
Google Scholar

Dennis, P. McCourt and Y. Huang. (2005). Molecular tailoring of farnesylation for plant drought tolerance and yield protection. Plant J. 43: 413-24.
Google Scholar

Williamson, J. D., and R.S. Quatrano. 1988. ABA regulation of two classes of embryo specific sequences in mature wheat embryos. Plant Physiol. 86: 208-215.
Google Scholar

Zhang, H., M. Q. Qiu, G. X Wang, Y. Gan, K. F. Zheng and X. G. Yao. 2009. The effect of sensitivity to absicic acid on stomatal behavior in Arabidopsis thaliana. EurAsian J. BioSci. 3: 10-16.
Google Scholar

Zhang, J., W. Jia, J. Yang and A. M. Ismail. (2006). Role of ABA in integrating plant responses to drought and salt stress. Field Crop Res. 97: 111–119.
Google Scholar


Opublikowane
2016-12-20

Cited By / Share

Razzaq, A., Rashid, M., Shfique, T. A., Hafeez, A., Jhanzab, H. M., Shabir, G., & Shah, Z. H. . (2016). ABA SENSITIVITY AS A CRITERION FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE IN WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) CULTIVARS. Plant Breeding and Seed Science, 74, 73–84. Pobrano z http://ojs.ihar.edu.pl/index.php/pbss/article/view/224

Autorzy

Abdul Razzaq 
shahzahid578@hotmail.com
Crop Physiology Lab, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 Pakistan

Autorzy

Madiha Rashid 

Crop Physiology Lab, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 Pakistan

Autorzy

Talal Ahmad Shfique 

Crop Physiology Lab, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 Pakistan

Autorzy

Abdul Hafeez 

Crop Physiology Lab, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 Pakistan

Autorzy

Hafiz Muhammad Jhanzab 

Crop Physiology Lab, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 Pakistan

Autorzy

Ghulam Shabir 

Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 Pakistan

Autorzy

Zahid Hussain Shah 

Department of Arid Land Agriculture, King Abdul Aziz University Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. PC –21577 Saudi Arabia

Statystyki

Abstract views: 132
PDF downloads: 43


Licencja

Wszystkie artykuły publikowane w formie elektronicznej na mocy licencji CC BY-SA 4.0, w otwartym dostępie (open access), pełna treść licencji jest dostępna pod adresem: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode.pl .