Genetic analysis of plant height, yield components and seed yield in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) cultivars

Amiri-Oghana,H., M.H. Fotokianb, F. Javidfar and B. Alizadeha .2009. Genetic analysis of seed yield, days to flowering and maturity in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) using diallel crosses. International J. Plant Production 2:19-26.
Google Scholar

Brandle, J.E., and P.B.E. McVetty. 1989. Heterosis and combining ability in hybrids derived from oilseed rape cultivars and inbred lines. Crop Sci. 29: 1191-1194.
Google Scholar

Cockerham, C. C. 1963. Estimation of genetic variances, pp. 53-94. In W.D. Hanson and H.F. Robinson (ed.), Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding. National Research Council Publication 982, National Academy of Science, Washington, D.C.
Google Scholar

Downey, R.K., and S.R. Rimer.1993. Agronomic improvement in oilseed Brassicas. Adv. Agron. 50: 1-150. Farhatullah, S. Ali and F. Ullah. 2004. Comparative yield potential and other quality characteristics of advanced lines of rapeseed. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 6(1): 203-205.
Google Scholar

Ghosh, S.K. and S.C. Gulati, 2001. Genetic variability and association of yield components in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Crop Res.Hisar, 21: 345–349.
Google Scholar

Griffing, B. 1956. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel systems. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 9: 463-493.
Google Scholar

Hayman, B. I. 1954a. The analysis of variance of diallel tables. Biometrics 10: 235-244. Hayman, B. I. 1954b. The theory and analysis of diallel crosses. Genetics 39: 789-809.
Google Scholar

Jinks, J.L., 1954. Analysis of continuous variation in diallel crosses of Nicotiana rustica. Genetics, 39: 767– 88.
Google Scholar

Khan, F. A. and R.S.A. Khan. 2005. Inheritance pattern of quantitative characters in Brassica napus. Int. J. Agric. Bio., 7(3): 420-423.
Google Scholar

Khan, M. N., S.A. Shah, S.A. Wani and G. Zaffar. 2006. Combining ability and gene action in gobhi sarson (Brassica napus L.). Adv. Plant Sci., 19(1): 285-293.
Google Scholar

Kearsey, M.J., and H.S. Pooni 1996. The Genetical Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Chapman and Hall, Lon- don.
Google Scholar

Mahmud, F., M. G. Rasul, M.A.K. Mian and M.A. Rahim. 2009. Combining ability and gene action for seed yield and yield components in Brassica napus L. Int.J. Agric. Envir. Biotech., 2(3): 235-242.
Google Scholar

Mather, K. and J.L. Jinks, 1982. Biometrical Genetics, 3rd Ed. Chapman and Hall, London
Google Scholar

McGee, K.P., and J. Brown. 1995. Investigation of F1 hybrids performance in fall- and spring-planted canola. P. 116–118. In Proc. 9th Int. Rapeseed Confr., 4–10 July 1995. Cambridge, U.K.
Google Scholar

Nassimi, A.W., R.S. Ali, G. Hassan and N. Ali. 2006. Combining ability analysis for maturity and other traits in rapeseed (Brassica napus). J. of Agron. 5(3): 523-526.
Google Scholar

Rameeh, V. 2011. Combining ability analysis of rapeseed genotypes under restricted nitrogen application. J. of Oilseed Brassica, 2(1): 7-12.
Google Scholar

Satija, D.R., I. Versha and P. Singh, 2001. Estimation of gene effects for seed yield and component traits in crosses of Brassica napus involving indigenous and exotic parents. Crop Improv., 28: 50–55.
Google Scholar

Shen, J. X., T.D. Fu, J. S. Yang, C. Z. Ma and J.X. Tu. 2005. Genetic analysis of rapeseed self-incompatibility lines reveals significant heterosis of different patterns for yield and oil content traits. Plant Breed., 124, 111-116.
Google Scholar

Singh, D., V. Malik and H. Singh. 1995. Gene action of seed yield and other desirable characters in oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Annal of Biology Ludhiana 11(1-2): 94-97.
Google Scholar

Singh, H., and C.K. Yadav. 1980. Gene action and combining ability for seed yield, flowering and maturity in rapeseed. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 50: 655-658.
Google Scholar

Singh, J.N., and B.R. Murty. 1980. Combining ability and maternal effects in B. campestris var.yellow sarson. Theor. Appl. Genet. 56: 263-272.
Google Scholar

Singh, M., L. Singh and S.B.L. Srivastava. 2010. Combining ability analysis in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). J. of Oilseed Brassica, 1(1): 23-27.
Google Scholar

Google Scholar

Singh, R.K. and B.D. Chaudhry. 2004. Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. Kalyani Pub- lishers, New Delhi, India.
Google Scholar

Teklewold, A., and H.C. Becker. 2005. Heterosis and combining ability in a diallel cross of Ethiopian Mus- tard inbred lines. Crop Sci. 45: 2629-2635.
Google Scholar

Thakur, H.L., and J.C. Sagwal. 1997. Heterosis and combining ability in oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Indian J. Genet. 57:163-167.
Google Scholar

Thurling, N. 1991. Application of the ideotype concept in breeding for higher yield in the oilseed brassicas. Field Crops Res. 26( 2):201–219.
Google Scholar

Woś, H., I. Bartkowiak-Broda, G. Budzianowski, and J. Krzymanski. 1999. Breeding of winter and spring oilseed rape hybrids at Malyszyn. Paper 544. In Proc. 10th Int. Rapeseed Confr. [CD-ROM]. 26–29 Sep. 1999, Canberra, Australia.
Google Scholar

Yadav, Y.P., R. Prakash, R. Singh, R.K. Singh and J.S. Yadav. 2005. Genetics of yield and its component characters in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss.) under rainfed conditions. J. Oilseed Res., 22: 255-258.
Google Scholar

Zhang, Z. and S.K. Kang.1997. A SAS Program for Griffing’s Diallel Analyses. Agron. J.89:176-182.
Google Scholar