Variability of turf characters of Poa pratensis L. cultivars under medium intensive turf maintenance

Sławomir Prończuk

s.pronczuk@ihar.edu.pl
Zakład Roślin Motylkowatych i Traw, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Radzikowie (Poland)

Maria Prończuk


Zakład Roślin Motylkowatych i Traw, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Radzikowie (Poland)

Abstract

Twenty cultivars of Poa pratensis, including 5 strains originated from Poland, EU, and Canada were tested under medium intensive turf maintenance during 1999–2001 in Radzików (central Poland). Turf characters such as: overwintering, general aesthetic aspect, density of sward, slow regrowth, fineness of leaf, wintergreeness, colour, resistant to melting out (Drechslera poae), and yellow rust (Puccinia striiformis) were evaluated. Mean aesthetic aspect, and turf quality index were calculated. Both, evaluated and calculated characters were divided in two groups: main (4 characters) and particular (13 characters). The variability of cultivar characters in seasons and years, and relationship between characters were analysed. Significant differences among cultivars for tested characters were found. Polish cultivars were located in good group according to the main characters such as: overwintering, mean aesthetic aspect, turf quality, and wintergreeness. They also showed a good level of resistance to melting out but were susceptible to yellow rust. Among tested cultivars Barcelona, and Bartitia performed the best in many characters. Breeding strains didn’t exhibit new turf values. The great variability was found in cultivar characters in seasons and years of turf maintenance. Characters such as overwintering, wintergreeness, and disease resistance showed the highest variability among cultivars with range from 0 to 47%. The significant relationship between the general aesthetic aspect and many particular characters was found. These results confirmed that aesthetic aspect is the most important character in turf cultivars evaluation.

 

Keywords:

Poa pratensis, cultivars, relationship of characters, turf characters, variability of characters

Anonim 1. 1991–1992. Graminées á gazon. Bulletin des variétés. Ministére de I Agriculture et de la Forât. Repulique Francaise: 179 ss.
Google Scholar

Anonim 2. 1997. Turfgrass seed. STRI Bingley, West Yorkshire England: 16 ss.
Google Scholar

Bara R. F., Dickson W. K., Murphy J. A., Smith D. A. Funk C. R. 1993. Performance of Kentucky bluegrass cultivars and selections in New Jersey turf trials. Rutgers Turfgrass Proc. of the New Jersey Turfgrass Expo. December 7 — 9. Atlantic City: 49 — 93.
Google Scholar

Brede D. 2002. Adaptability of traditional turf species to lower maintenance. Golf course management. Vol. 70, no 5: 59 — 62.
Google Scholar

Busey P. 1980. Turfgrass field plot methods: An overview. Proc. 4 Inter. Turfgrass Conf. Guelp, Canada: 157 — 164.
Google Scholar

Domański P. 2000. Syntezy wyników doświadczeń odmianowych — Trawy darniowe (kostrzewa czerwona, wiechlina łąkowa, życica trwała). COBORU, Słupia Wielka z. 1189: 40 ss.
Google Scholar

Falkowski M. 1982. Trawy polskie. PWRiL, Warszawa: 565 ss.
Google Scholar

Morris K. N. 2000. Guidelines for using NTEP trial data. Golf course management. Vol. 68 No 4: 64 — 69.
Google Scholar

Morris K. N. 2000 a Custom data available from NTEP grass trials. Golf course management. Vol. 68 No 9: 64 — 66.
Google Scholar

Morris K. N. 2002. Turning the tables at NTEP. Golf course management. Vol. 70 No 9: 49 — 53.
Google Scholar

Prończuk S. 1993. System oceny traw gazonowych. Biul. IHAR 186: 127 — 132.
Google Scholar

Prończuk M., Prończuk S. 1997. Problemy w ocenie podatności traw gazonowych na choroby w warunkach trawnikowych.. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 451: 135 — 146.
Google Scholar

Prończuk S., Prończuk M., Żyłka D. 1997. Metody syntetycznej oceny wartości użytkowej traw gazonowych. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 451: 125 — 133.
Google Scholar

Rutkowska B., Hempel A. 1986. Trawniki. PWRiL, Warszawa: 247 ss.
Google Scholar

Shildrick J. 1992. Turfgrass manual. The Sports Turf Research Institute Bingley, England: 60 ss.
Google Scholar

Skogley C. R., Sawyer C. D. 1992. Field research. In: Turfgrass. Waddington R. N. et al. (eds.) Agronomy Monograph. 32: 589 — 614.
Google Scholar

Smith D. A, Bara R., Dickson W. K., Clarke B. C., Funk C. R. 1993. Leaf spot on Kentucky bluegrass cultivar evaluation trial at Rutgers University. Rutgers Turfgrass Proc. of the New Jersey Turfgrass Expo, December 7–9, Atlantic City: 116 — 137.
Google Scholar

Wójcik A. R., Laudański Z. 1989. Planowanie i wnioskowanie statystyczne w doświadczalnictwie. PWN, Warszawa: 1 — 318.
Google Scholar

Van Wijk A. J. P. 1989. The relationship between turf performance and single plant morphology data in red fescue. Proc. of the 6 Inter. Turfgrass Res. Conf. July 31-August 5,Tokyo, Japan: 113 — 115.
Google Scholar

Żurek G., Prończuk S., Żyłka D. 2001. Ocena przydatności ekotypów wiechliny łąkowej (Poa pratensis L.) do warunków intensywnego użytkowania trawnikowego. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk. Rol. 474: 139 — 143.
Google Scholar


Published
2003-03-31

Cited by

Prończuk, S. and Prończuk, M. (2003) “Variability of turf characters of Poa pratensis L. cultivars under medium intensive turf maintenance”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (225), pp. 265–276. doi: 10.37317/biul-2003-0213.

Authors

Sławomir Prończuk 
s.pronczuk@ihar.edu.pl
Zakład Roślin Motylkowatych i Traw, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Radzikowie Poland

Authors

Maria Prończuk 

Zakład Roślin Motylkowatych i Traw, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Radzikowie Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 143
PDF downloads: 31


License

Copyright (c) 2003 Sławomir Prończuk, Maria Prończuk

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>