ABA SENSITIVITY AS A CRITERION FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE IN WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) CULTIVARS
Abdul Razzaq
shahzahid578@hotmail.comCrop Physiology Lab, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 (Pakistan)
Madiha Rashid
Crop Physiology Lab, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 (Pakistan)
Talal Ahmad Shfique
Crop Physiology Lab, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 (Pakistan)
Abdul Hafeez
Crop Physiology Lab, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 (Pakistan)
Hafiz Muhammad Jhanzab
Crop Physiology Lab, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 (Pakistan)
Ghulam Shabir
Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 (Pakistan)
Zahid Hussain Shah
Department of Arid Land Agriculture, King Abdul Aziz University Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. PC –21577 (Saudi Arabia)
Abstract
Criteria used for evaluating drought tolerance of wheat cultivars demanding more time and efforts are usually not efficient and conclusive. Present study was conducted to evaluate ABA sensitivity as a criterion for evaluating drought tolerance of wheat cultivars at an early stage. Ten cultivars of wheat were subjected to drought at 3-leaf stage to select the most sensitive and two tolerant cultivars using mortality rate. Tatara was found the most susceptible whereas GA-2002 and Chakwal-50 were the cultivars with maximum drought tolerance. These cultivars were used to study sensitivity to applied absicic acid (based on germination index and relative growth inhibition rate) and physiological responses (leaf water content, chlorophyll stability index, coefficient of relative inhibition and proline accumulation) under drought stress. Highest ABAsensitivity was recorded in GA-2002 and Chakwal-50 whereas Tatara manifested minimum sensitivity. ABAsensitivity corresponded to physiological indices of drought tolerance. Results show that ABA-sensitivity is an efficient criterion that can be used to evaluate drought tolerance of wheat cultivars at early stage.
Keywords:
ABA, chlorophyll, inhibition, prolineReferences
Almeselmani, M. 2011. Effect of Drought on Different Physiological Characters and Yield Component in Different Varieties of Syrian Durum Wheat. J. Agric. Sci. 3 (3)
Google Scholar
Bajji, M., S. Lutts, and J. M. Kinet. 2000. Physiological changes after exposure to and recovery from polyethylene glycol-induced water deficit in callus cultures issued from durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) cultivars differing in drought resistance. J. Plant Physiol. 156 (1): 75-83
Google Scholar
Balla, K., Z. Bed and O. Veisz. 2006. Effect of heat and Drought stress on the photosynthetic processes of wheat. Cereal Research Communications. 34 (1): 381-385
Google Scholar
Bayoumi, T. Y., M. H. Eid and E. M. Metwali. 2008. Application of physiological and biochemical indices as a screening technique for drought tolerance in wheat genotypes. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 7: 2341-2352.
Google Scholar
Cornic, G. 2000. Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal aperture not by affecting ATP synthesis. Trends Plant Sci. 5: 187-198.
Google Scholar
Cutler, S., M. Ghassemian, D. Bonetta, S. Cooney and P. McCourt. 1996. Science 273: 1239-41.
Google Scholar
Delauney, A. J. and D. P. S. Verma. 1993. Proline biosynthesis and osmoregulation in plants. Plant J. 4: 215- 223.
Google Scholar
Dhanda, S.S., G.S. Sethi and R. K. Behl. 2004. Indices of drought tolerance in wheat genotypes at early stages of plant growth. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 190 (1): 6-12.
Google Scholar
Errabii, T., C.B. Gandonou, H. Essalmani, J. Abrini, M. Idomar and N.S. Senhaji. 2006. Proline and ion accumulation in sugarcane callus cultures under drought-induced osmotic stress and its subsequent relief. Afri. J. Biotechnol. 5: 1148-1493.
Google Scholar
Finkelstein, R., S.I. Gibson. 2002. ABA and sugar interactions regulating development: “cross-talk” or “voices in a crowd”. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 5:26–32.
Google Scholar
Guoth, A., I. Tari, A. Galle, J. Csiszar, A. Pecsvaradi, L. Cseuz and L. Erdei. 2009. Comparison of the drought stress responses of tolerant and sensitive wheat cultivars during grain filling: changes in flag leaf photosynthetic activity, ABA levels and grain yield. J. Plant Growth Reg. 28: 167–176.
Google Scholar
Gunes A., D. Pilbeam, A. Inal. and S. Coban. 2008. Influence of silicon on sunflower cultivars under drought stress, I: Growth, antioxidant mechanisms and lipid peroxidation. Commun. Soil Sci. Pl. Nutr. 39: 1885– 1903.
Google Scholar
Kavi K., S. Sangam, R.N. Amrutha, P.S. Laxmi, K.R. Naidu, K.R.S.S. Rao, S. Rao, K.J. Reddy, P. Theriappan and N. Sreenivasulu. 2005. Regulation of proline biosynthesis, degradation, uptake and transport in higher plants: its implications in plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance. Curr. Sci. 88: 424–438.
Google Scholar
Khanna-Chopra, R. and D. S. Selote. 2007. Acclimation to drought stress generates oxidative stress tolerance in drought resistant than susceptible wheat cultivar under field conditions. Environ. Exp. Bot. 60: 276– 283.
Google Scholar
Kobayashi, F., S. Takumi and C. Nakamura. 2008. Increased freezing tolerance in an ABA-hypersensitive mutant of common wheat. J. Plant Physiol. 165: 224-32.
Google Scholar
Kurahashi, Y., A. Terashima and S. Takumi. 2009. Variation in Dehydration Tolerance, ABA Sensitivity and Related Gene Expression Patterns in D-Genome Progenitor and Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat Lines. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 10: 2733-2751.
Google Scholar
Nyachiro, J.M., F. R. Clarke, R. M. DePauw, R. E. Knox and K. C. Armstrong. 2002. The effects of cis-trans ABA on embryo germination and seed dormancy in wheat. Euphytica., 126: 129–133.
Google Scholar
Qayyum, A., A. Razzaq, M. Ahmad and M.A. Jenks. 2011. Water stress causes differential effects on germination indices, total soluble sugar and proline content in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. African. J. Biotech., 10 (64): 14038-14045.
Google Scholar
Raikhel, N.V., B.A. Palevitz and C.H. Haigler. (1986). Absicic acid control of lectin accumulation in wheat seedling and callus culture: effect of exogenous ABA and flouridone. Plant Physiol. 80: 167-171.
Google Scholar
Ramesh, H., and P. Devasenapathy. 2006. Physiological Response of Cowpea in a Rainfed Alfisol Ecosystem to the Impulse of Soil Moisture Conservation Practices. Gen. Appl. Plant Physiol. 32 (3-4): 181-190.
Google Scholar
Reddy, L.V., R. J. Metzger and T. M. Ching. 1985. Effect of temperature on seed dormancy of wheat. Crop Sci. 25: 455–458
Google Scholar
Sanchez-Rodriguez, E., M. Rubio-Wilhelmi, L. M. Cervilla, B. Blasco, J. J. Rios, M. A. Rosales, L. Romero and J. M. Ruiz. 2010. Genotypic differences in some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress under moderate drought in tomato plants. Plant Sci. 178: 30-40.
Google Scholar
Schramm E., J. Abellera, L. Strader, K.G. Campbell and C.M. Steber. 2008. Can ABA signaling be used to develop drought tolerant wheat. The 11th International Wheat Genetics Symposium proceedings, Ed, Rudi Appels Russell Eastwood Evans Lagudah Peter Langridge Michael Mackay Lynne. Washington State University.
Google Scholar
Shao, L., L.T. Young and J.F. Wang. 2005. Chronic treatment with mood stabilizers lithium and valproate prevents excitotoxicity by inhibiting oxidative stress in rat cerebral cortical cells. Biol. Psychiatry. 58: 879–84.
Google Scholar
Siddique, M.R.B., A. Hamid and M.S. Islam. 2000. Drought stress effects on water relation of wheat. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin., 41 (1): 35-39.
Google Scholar
Tas, S., and T. Birol. 2007. Some Physiological Responses of Drought Stress in Wheat Genotypes with Different Ploidity in Turkiye. World J. Agric. Sci. 3 (2): 178-183.
Google Scholar
Tatar, O. and M. N. Gevrek. 2008. Influence of water stress on proline accumulation, lipid peroxidation and water content of wheat. Asian J. Plant Sci. 7(4): 409-412.
Google Scholar
Thomas, T. L., J. Vivekananda and M. A. Bogue. 1991. ABA regulation of gene expression in embryos and mature plants. In: W.J. Davies & H.G. Jones (Eds.), Abscisic Acid Physiology and Biochemistry, Environmental Plant Biology Series, Bios Scientific Publishers, Oxford, UK. pp. 125–135
Google Scholar
Turner, N. C., and M. M. Jones. 1980. Turgor maintenance by osmotic adjustment. In: Adaptations of plants to water and high temperature stress. Turner NC, Kramer PG (eds). John Wiley, New York., pp. 87-103.
Google Scholar
Valentovic, P., M. Luxova, L. Kolarovic and O. Gasparikova. 2006. Effect of osmotic stress on compatible solutes content, membrane stability and water relations in two maize cultivars. Plant Soil Environ. 4: 186-191.
Google Scholar
Vendruscolo, A.C. G., I. Schuster, M. Pileggi, C. A. Scapim, H.B.C. Molinar, C. J. Marur and L. G. C. Vieira. 2007. Stress-induced synthesis of praline confers tolerance to water deficit in transgenic wheat. J. Plant. Physiol. 164(10): 1367-1376.
Google Scholar
Wang, Y., J. Ying, M. Kuzma, M. Chalifoux, A. Sample, C. McArthur, T. Uchacz, C. Sarvas, J. Wan, D. T.
Google Scholar
Dennis, P. McCourt and Y. Huang. (2005). Molecular tailoring of farnesylation for plant drought tolerance and yield protection. Plant J. 43: 413-24.
Google Scholar
Williamson, J. D., and R.S. Quatrano. 1988. ABA regulation of two classes of embryo specific sequences in mature wheat embryos. Plant Physiol. 86: 208-215.
Google Scholar
Zhang, H., M. Q. Qiu, G. X Wang, Y. Gan, K. F. Zheng and X. G. Yao. 2009. The effect of sensitivity to absicic acid on stomatal behavior in Arabidopsis thaliana. EurAsian J. BioSci. 3: 10-16.
Google Scholar
Zhang, J., W. Jia, J. Yang and A. M. Ismail. (2006). Role of ABA in integrating plant responses to drought and salt stress. Field Crop Res. 97: 111–119.
Google Scholar
Authors
Abdul Razzaqshahzahid578@hotmail.com
Crop Physiology Lab, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 Pakistan
Authors
Madiha RashidCrop Physiology Lab, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 Pakistan
Authors
Talal Ahmad ShfiqueCrop Physiology Lab, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 Pakistan
Authors
Abdul HafeezCrop Physiology Lab, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 Pakistan
Authors
Hafiz Muhammad JhanzabCrop Physiology Lab, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 Pakistan
Authors
Ghulam ShabirDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PC – 46300 Pakistan
Authors
Zahid Hussain ShahDepartment of Arid Land Agriculture, King Abdul Aziz University Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. PC –21577 Saudi Arabia
Statistics
Abstract views: 145PDF downloads: 48
License
All articles published in electronic form under CC BY-SA 4.0, in open access, the full content of the licence is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode.pl .