Usefulness evaluation of the Polish varieties of tussock grasses for sowing paths

Włodzimierz Majtkowski

w.majtkowski@ihar.edu.pl
Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Ogród Botaniczny Krajowego Centrum Roślinnych Zasobów Genowych w Bydgoszczy (Poland)

Jan Schmidt


Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Ogród Botaniczny Krajowego Centrum Roślinnych Zasobów Genowych w Bydgoszczy (Poland)

Abstract

The paper includes the results of suitability assessment of 18 cultivars for sowing in paths of grass surface. In the experiment conducted in years 2010–2016, the tussock varieties belonging to 4 species of lawn grasses were used: red fescue (Festuca rubra), sheep's fescue (F. ovina), tall fescue (F. arundinacea) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). The aim of the study was to examine the quality of the lawn varieties exploited in the extensive conditions of use. The varieties of red fescue Dorosa and Mirena, and the variety of perennial ryegrass Boxer were the best ones in terms of the state of the turf after the winter. The varieties of narrow-leaf fescue were characterized by the best sodding. The varieties of narrow-leaf fescue were characterized by the best compactness of paths in the habitats collection with the modified subsoil (hardened layer), whereas in the collection of leguminous plants (subsoil unchanged) it was the quality of the varieties of tall fescue. All varieties of tall fescue, sheep's fescue variety Noni, and the varieties of red fescue Dorosa and Rapsodia were characterized by the most favorable general aspect of autumn. The use of mixtures composed of lawn tussock varieties would allow to reduce the workload on the nurturing of borders of the lawn finished as so-called "sharp edge" and to reduce the overgrowth of lawn inside the flower bed between the materials used to make the shoreline.

Supporting Agencies

The research was financed by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development under the Multiannual Program for 2015-2020

Keywords:

lawn grass, varietes, grassy path, low-maintnance, quality lawn

Brede D. 2004. Blending Kentucky Bluegrass cultivars of different quality performance levels. Crop Sci. 44: 561 — 566.
Google Scholar

Broda Z., Kozłowski S., Kaszuba J. 2003. Perspektywy hodowli Lolium perenne. Łąk. Pol. 6: 29 — 36.
Google Scholar

Dernoeden P. H., Fidanza M. A., Krose J. M. 1998. Low maintenance performance of five Festuca species in monostands and mixtures. Crop Sci. 38, 2: 434 — 438.
Google Scholar

Domański P., Golińska B. 2003. Perspektywy Lolium perenne w użytkowaniu trawnikowym i darniowym. Łąk. Pol. 6: 37 — 45.
Google Scholar

Ferguson G.A., Takane Y. 1999. Analiza statystyczna w psychologii i pedagogice. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Harkot W., Czarnecki Z. 1999. Przydatność polskich odmian traw gazonowych do zadarniania powierzchni w trudnych warunkach glebowych. Fol. Univ. Agric. Stetin. 197 Agricultura 75: 117 — 120.
Google Scholar

Laudański Z., Prończuk S., Prończuk M. 2004. Propozycja syntezy cech użytkowych w ocenie wartości trawnikowej odmian Festuca ssp. Biul. IHAR 233: 181 — 193.
Google Scholar

Prokopiuk K., Żurek G. 2011. Ocena wpływu odmian wiechliny łąkowej (Poa pratensis L.) na jakość mieszanek przeznaczonych do zadarniania terenów zacienionych. Biul. IHAR 262: 183 — 195.
Google Scholar

Prończuk S. 1993. System oceny traw gazonowych w Polsce. Biul. IHAR 186: 127 — 132.
Google Scholar

Prończuk M., Prończuk S. 2006. Cechy użytkowe odmian Poa pratensis przeznaczonych na trawniki zacienione. Zesz. Nauk. Uniw. Przyrod. we Wrocławiu nr 545, Seria Rolnictwo LXXXVIII: 229 — 240.
Google Scholar

SAS Institute Inc. 2004 a. SAS 9.1 Companion for Windows. Cary, NC, USA, SAS Publishing, SAS Institute Inc.
Google Scholar

SAS Institute Inc. 2004 b. SAS/STAT 9.1 User's Guide. Cary, NC, USA, SAS Publishing, SAS Institute Inc.
Google Scholar

Starczewski K., Affek-Starczewska A. 2011. Ocena zadarnienia wybranych odmian życicy trwałej w murawach trawnikowych. Fragm. Agron. 28, 4: 70 — 76.
Google Scholar

Stypczyńska Z., Dziamski A., Schmidt J. 2012. Evaluation of lawn grass cultivars representing the genus festuca at the initial stage of growth based on the morphometric root system studies. Acta Sci. Pol., Agricultura 11, 3: 75 — 84.
Google Scholar

Thorogood D. 2003. Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). In: Turfgrass biology, genetics and breeding. M.D. Casler, R. R. Duncan (eds.) John Wiley & Sons Inc USA. New Jersey: 75 — 106.
Google Scholar

Żurek G. 2004. Reakcja wybranych odmian traw gazonowych na naturalną i symulowaną suszę. Biul. IHAR 233: 195 — 209.
Google Scholar

Żurek G. 2007. Ocena krajowych odmian trawnikowych w użytkowaniu ekstensywnym. Biul. IHAR 243: 119 — 131.
Google Scholar


Published
2016-12-30

Cited by

Majtkowski, W. and Schmidt, J. (2016) “Usefulness evaluation of the Polish varieties of tussock grasses for sowing paths”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (280), pp. 87–99. doi: 10.37317/biul-2016-0009.

Authors

Włodzimierz Majtkowski 
w.majtkowski@ihar.edu.pl
Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Ogród Botaniczny Krajowego Centrum Roślinnych Zasobów Genowych w Bydgoszczy Poland

Authors

Jan Schmidt 

Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Ogród Botaniczny Krajowego Centrum Roślinnych Zasobów Genowych w Bydgoszczy Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 45
PDF downloads: 29


License

Copyright (c) 2016 Włodzimierz Majtkowski, Jan Schmidt

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.