Identyfikacja roślinnych mieszańców oddalonych — przegląd metod

Anamhawat-Jonsson K., Schwarzacher T., Leitch A. R., Bennett M. D., Heslop-Harrison J. S. 1990. Discrimination between closely related Triticeae species using genomic DANN as a probe. Theor. Appl. Genet. 79: 721 — 728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224236
Google Scholar

Arisumi T. 1980. Rescuing abortive Impatiens hybrids through aseptic culture of ovules. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 110: 273 — 276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.110.2.273
Google Scholar

Bajaj Y. P. S., Mahajan S. K., Labana K. S. 1986. Insterspecific hybridization of Brassica napus and B. juncea through ovary, ovule and embryo culture. Euphytica 35: 103 — 109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028547
Google Scholar

Barbosa L. V., Vieira M. L. C. 1997. Meiotic behaviour of passion fruit somatic hybrids, Passiflora edulis f. flavicarpa Degener + P.amethystina Mikan. Euphytica 98: 121 — 127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003099709021
Google Scholar

Bauer H. 1993. Identification of “flower-sports” of pelargonium and roses by phenolic compounds. Gartenbauwissenschaft 58: 82 — 89.
Google Scholar

Bednarek P. T., Chwedorzewska, K. 2001. Markery molekularne, ich charakterystyka genetyczna oraz wybrane zastosowania w analizie genetycznej roślin. Biotechnologia 1 (52): 9 — 34.
Google Scholar

Bell J. A., Simpson D. W. 1994. The use of isoenzyme polymorphisms as an aid for cultivar identification in strawberry. Euphytica 77: 113 — 117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02551472
Google Scholar

Belea A. 1992. Interspecific and intergeneric crosses in cultivated plants. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.
Google Scholar

Booy G., Wouters T. C. A. E., Kleyn-Noordijk Y. 1998. Identification of lily cultivars using isoelectric focusing of proteins from bulb scales and tissue culture bulblets. Plant Breeding 117: 57 — 62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1998.tb01448.x
Google Scholar

Broda Z., Szklarska-Śpitalniak H. 1997. Cytogenetyczna i izoenzymatyczna analiza mieszańców międzygatunkowych lucerny. Mat. I Krajowej Konferencji “Hodowla Roślin”, Poznań: 475 — 478.
Google Scholar

Chen L. Z., Adachi T. 1996. Efficient hybridization between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. peruvianum via ‘embryo rescue’ and in vitro propagation. Plant Breeding 115: 251 — 256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1996.tb00912.x
Google Scholar

Choudhary B. R., Joshi P., Ramarao S. 2000. Interspecific hybridization between Brassica carinata and Brassica rapa. Plant Breeding 119: 417 — 420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.2000.00503.x
Google Scholar

Chung G. H., Kim J. H. 1990. Production of interspecific hybrids between Glycine max and G. tomentella through embryo culture. Euphytica 48: 97 — 101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037186
Google Scholar

Cubero J., I., Millan, T., Osuna, F., Torres,A., M., Cobos, S. 1996. Varietal identification in Rosa by using isozyme and RAPD markers. Acta Horticulturae 424: 261 — 264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1996.424.46
Google Scholar

Darvey N. L., Gustafson J. P. 1975. Identification of rye chromosomes in wheat-rye addition lines and triticale by heterochromatin bands. Crop Sci. 15: 239 — 243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1975.0011183X001500020029x
Google Scholar

De Benedetti L., Burchi G., Mercuri A., Pecchioni N., Faccioli P., Schiva T. 2000. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis for the verification of hybridity in interspecific crosses of Alstroemeria. Plant Breeding 119: 443 — 445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.2000.00516.x
Google Scholar

Deng Z. N., Gentile A., Domina A., Nicolosi E., Tribulato E., Vardi A. 1994. Recovery of citrus somatic hybrids tolerant to Phoma tracheiphila toxin, combining selection and identification by RAPD markers. In: Current issues in plant molecular and cellular biology. Terzi M., Cella R., Fallavigna A. (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 177 — 183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0307-7_23
Google Scholar

Fernandez, A., M., Nakazaki, T., Tanisaka, T. 1996. Development of diploid and triploid interspecific hybrids between Lilium longiflorum and L. concolor by ovary slice culture. Plant Breeding 115: 167 — 171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1996.tb00895.x
Google Scholar

Ferreira J. J., Alvarez E., Fueyo M. A., Roca A., Giraldez R. 2000. Determination of the outcrossing rate of Phaseolus vulgaris L. using seed protein markers. Euphytica 113: 259 — 263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003907130234
Google Scholar

Gavrilenko T. A., Barbakar N. I., Pavlov A. V. 1992. Somatic hybridization between Lycopersicon esculentum and non-tuberous Solanum species of the Etuberosa series. Plant Science 86: 203 — 214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(92)90166-J
Google Scholar

Giddings G. D., Rees H. 1992. A Nicotiana gametosomatic hybrid and its progenies. J. Exp. Bot. 43: 419 — 425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/43.3.419
Google Scholar

Gill B. S., Friebe B., Endo T. R. 1991. Standard karyotype and nomenclature system for description of chromosome bands and structural aberrations in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Genome 34: 830 — 839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/g91-128
Google Scholar

Gomathinayagam P., Ganeshram S., Rathnaswamy R., Ramaswamy N. M. 1998. Interspecific hybridization between Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. and V. vexillata (L.) A. Rich. through in vitro embryo culture. Euphytica 102: 203 — 209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018381614098
Google Scholar

Groh B., Bauer H., Treutter D. 1994. Chemotaxonomical investigations of Prunus domestica by isoenzyme markers and phenolic compounds. Scientia Horticulturae 58: 41 — 55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(94)90126-0
Google Scholar

Guangmin X., Huimin C. 1996. Plant regeneration from intergeneric somatic hybridization between Triticum aestivum L. and Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel. Plant Sci. 120: 197 — 203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(96)04492-5
Google Scholar

Ha S., Maekawa M., Kita F., Kinoshita T. 1998. Cytological relationships among Eumelilotus species analysed using cytological observations of interspecific hybrids obtained by in vitro culture. Euphytica 101: 17 — 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018310824686
Google Scholar

Hansen L. N. 1998. Intertribal somatic hybridization between rapid cycling Brassica oleracea L. and Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz. Euphytica 104: 173 — 179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018604919488
Google Scholar

Hasterok R., Małuszyńska J. 1997. Analiza cytogenetyczna wybranych gatunków Brassica. Mat. konf. Hodowla Roślin. Poznań: 467 — 473.
Google Scholar

Helgeson J. P., Haberlach G. T. 1999. Somatic hybrids of Solanum tuberosum and related species. In: Plant biotechnology and in vitro biology in the 21st century. Altman A., Ziv M., Izhar S. (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 151 — 154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4661-6_35
Google Scholar

Henn, H. J., Wingerder, R., Schnabi, H. 1998. Regeneration of fertile interspecific hybrids from protoplast fusions between Helianthus annus L. and wild Helianthus species. Plant Cell Rep. 18: 220 — 224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050560
Google Scholar

Hizume M., Sato S., Tanaka A. 1980. A highly reproducible method of nucleolus organizing regions staining in plants. Stain Technology 55: 87 — 90.
Google Scholar

Hu Y. S, Clark M. S., Pehu E. 1993. Use of RAPD markers to screen somatic hybrids between Solanum tuberosum and S. brevidens. Plant Cell Reports 12:107 — 109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00241944
Google Scholar

Jensen C. J. 1977. Monoploid production by chromosome elimination. In: Plant cell tissue, and organ culture. Reinert J., Bajaj Y. P. S. (eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 299 — 330.
Google Scholar

Joung Y. H., Roh M. S., Bentz S. E. 2001. Characterization of Acer griseum and its putative interspecific hybrids. Acta Horticulturae 546: 217 — 220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.546.25
Google Scholar

Keep E. 1962. Satellite and nucleolar number in hybrids between Ribes nigrum and R. grossularia and their backcrosses. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 4: 206 — 218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/g62-025
Google Scholar

Keep E. 1975. Currants and gooseberries. In: Advances in fruit breeding. Janick J., Moore J.. (eds.), Purdue University Press, West Lafayette: 197 — 242.
Google Scholar

Khrustaleva L. I., Kik C. 1998. Cytogenetical studies in the bridge cross Allium cepa × (A. fistulosum × A. roylei). Theor. Appl. Genet. 96: 8 — 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050702
Google Scholar

Kim Y., Byrne D. H. 1996. Interspecific hybrid verification of Rosa with isosymes. HortScience 31: 1207 — 1209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.31.7.1207
Google Scholar

Kisaka H., Kisaka M., Kanno A., Kameya T. 1998 a. Production and analysis of plants that are somatic hybrids of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and carrot (Daucus carota L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 94: 221 — 226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050403
Google Scholar

Kisaka, H., Kisaka, M., Kanno, A., Kameya, T. 1998 b. Intergeneric somatic hybridization of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) by protoplast fusion. Plant Cell. Rep. 17: 362 — 367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050407
Google Scholar

Kucharska D., Orlikowska T. 1997. Kultury in vitro zarodków, zalążków i zalążni oraz znaczenie tych technik dla hodowli roślin ozdobnych. Hod. Rośl. Nasien. 4: 11 — 16.
Google Scholar

Kudo N., Niimi Y. 1999. Production of interspecific hybrid plants through cotyledonary segment culture of embryos derived from crosses between Hydrangea macrophylla f. hortensia (Lam.) Rehd. and H. arborescens. L. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 68: 803 — 808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs.68.803
Google Scholar

Ladizinsky G. 2000. A synthetic hexaploid (2n = 42) oat from the cross of Avena strigosa (2n = 14) and domesticated A. magna (2n = 28). Euphytica 116: 231 — 235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004056315278
Google Scholar

Li Y. G., Tanner G. J., Larkin P. J. 1995. Towards producing bloat-safe Medicago sativa L. through protoplast fusion. In: Current issues in plant molecular and cellular biology. Terzi M., Celia R., Falavigna A. (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 185 — 190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0307-7_24
Google Scholar

Lim K. B., van Tuyl J. M., Karlov G. I., Khrustaleva L. I., de Jong J. H. 2000. Introgression of interspecific hybrids of lily using genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). Acta Horticulturae 508: 105 — 111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.508.13
Google Scholar

Maisonneuve B., Chupeau M.C., Bellec Y., Chupeau Y. 1995. Sexual and somatic hybridization in the genus Lactuca. Euphytica 85: 281 — 285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0357-2_33
Google Scholar

Marasek A., Orlikowska T. 2001. Identyfikacja mieszańców oddalonych lilii w oparciu na markerach chromosomowych. Biotechnologia 3 (54): 243 — 248.
Google Scholar

Marczewski W. 1997. AFLP — nowa metoda badawcza w genetyce roślin. Biotechnologia 2 (37): 121 — 126.
Google Scholar

Masojć P. 2001. Ustalanie tożsamości genetycznej. W: Biotechnologia roślin. Malepszy S. (red.), PWN, Warszawa: 485 — 519.
Google Scholar

Matsui S. I., Sasaki M. 1973. Differential staining of nucleolus organisers in mammalian chromosomes. Nature 246: 148 — 150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/246148a0
Google Scholar

Metwally E. I., Haroun S. A., El-Fadly G. A. 1996. Interspecific cross between Cucurbita pepo L. and Cucurbita martinezii through in vitro embryo culture. Euphytica 90: 1 — 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025153
Google Scholar

Miranda M., Ikeda F., Endo T., Moriguchi T. 1997. Chromosome markers and alterations in mitotic cells from interspecific somatic hybrids analysed by fluorochrome staining. Plant Cell Reports 16: 807 — 812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050325
Google Scholar

Moruguchi T., Motomura T., Hidaka T., Akihamo T., Omura M. 1997. Analysis of mitochondrial genomes among Citrus plants produced by the interspecific somatic fusion of ‘Semina’ tangelo with rough lemon. Plant Cell Reporst 16: 397 — 400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050247
Google Scholar

Mohapatra T., Kirti P. B., Kumar V. D., Prakash S., Chopra V. L. 1998. Random chloroplast segregation and mitochondrial genome recombination in somatic hybrid plants of Diplotaxis catholica + Brassica juncea. Plant Cell Reports 17: 814 — 818. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050489
Google Scholar

Molnár-Láng M., Linc G., Friebe B. R., Sutka J. 2000. Detection of wheat-barley translocations by genomic in situ hybridization in derivatives of hybrids multiplied in vitro. Euphytica 112: 117 — 123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003840200744
Google Scholar

Momotaz A., Kato M., Kakihara F. 1998. Production of intergeneric hybrids between Brassica and Sinapsis species by means of embryo rescue techniques. Euphytica 103: 123 — 130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018331528368
Google Scholar

Morgan E. R., Burge G. K., Seelye J. F., Hopping M. E., Grant J. E. 1998. Production of inter-specific hybrids between Limonium perezii (Stapf) Hubb. and Limonium sinuatum (L.) Mill. Euphytica 102: 109 — 115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018384329409
Google Scholar

Nair N. V., 1999. Production and cyto-morphological analysis of intergeneric hybrids of Sorghum × Saccharum. Euphytica 108: 187 — 191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003633015836
Google Scholar

Nakano M., Mii M. 1993 a. Somatic hybridization between Dianthus chinensis and D. barbatus through protoplast fusion. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 1 — 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223802
Google Scholar

Nakano M., Mii M. 1993 b. Callus and root formation from an intergeneric somatic hybrid between Dianthus caryophyllus and Gypsophila paniculata. Scientia Horticulturae 53: 13 — 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(93)90133-B
Google Scholar

Nassar N. M. A., Vieira M. A., Vieira C., Grattapaglia D. 1998. A molecular and embryonic study of apomixis in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Euphytica 102: 9 — 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018303109798
Google Scholar

Navrátilova B., Bùžek J., Široký J., Havránek P. 1997. Construction of intergeneric somatic hybrids between Brassica oleracea and Armoracia rusticana. Biol. Plantarum 39: 531 — 541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000970529643
Google Scholar

Niemirowicz-Szczytt K., Malepszy S. 1989. Otrzymywanie i wykorzystanie mieszańców form oddalonych. W: Biotechnologia w genetyce i hodowli roślin. Malepszy S., Niemirowicz-Szczytt K., Przybecki Z. (red.). PWN, Warszawa: 81 — 150.
Google Scholar

North C., Wills A. B. 1969. Inter-specific hybrids of Lilium lankongense Franchet produced by embryo-culture. Euphytica 18: 430 — 434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00397793
Google Scholar

Obata Y., Niimi Y., Nakano M., Okazaki K., Miyajima I. 2000. Interspecific hybrids between Lilium nobilissimum and L. regale produced via ovules-with-placenta-tissue culture. Scientia Horticulturae 84: 191 — 204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(99)00115-6
Google Scholar

Okazaki K., Asano Y., Oosawa K. 1994. Interspecific hybrids between Lilium ‘Oriental’ hybrid and L. ‘Asiatic’ hybrid produced by embryo culture with revised media. Breeding Science: 44: 59 — 64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs1951.44.59
Google Scholar

Pinto F. M., Chupeau Y., Cabrera V. M. 1995. Molecular genetic characterization of plant somatic hybrids. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. 31: 96 — 100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02632244
Google Scholar

Pfosser H., Yemelyanava H., Leonhardt W. 2000. Identification of cultivars and hybrids in Syringa and Cucurbita by DNA fingerprinting. Acta Horticulturae 530: 455 — 462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.530.53
Google Scholar

Ran Y., Murray B. G., Hammett K. R. W. 1999. Karyotype analysis of the genus Clivia by Giemsa and fluorochrome banding and in situ hybridization. Euphytica 106: 139 — 147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003572705445
Google Scholar

Rodov V., Reznickova S., Bugaenko L., Davydova O. 1996. Tissue and cell cultures of interspecific mint hybrids: peculiarities of monoterpene accumulation. Acta Horticulturae 447: 607 — 608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.447.119
Google Scholar

Rogalska S. 1999. Zastosowanie metod cytogenetycznych w badaniach genetycznych i w hodowli roślin. W: Podstawy cytogenetyki roślin, Olszewska M. J. (red.). PWN, Warszawa: 177 — 209.
Google Scholar

Roh M. S., Griesbach R. J., Gross K. C., Line M. 1996 a. Identification and evaluation of the interspecific hybrid of Lilium longiflorum and L. callosum. Acta Horticulturae 414: 111 — 124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1996.414.11
Google Scholar

Roh M. S., Griesbach R. J., Lawson R. H., Gross K. C. 1996 b. Production and identification of interspecific hybrids of Lilium longiflorum and L. × elegans. Acta Horticulturae 414: 93 — 100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1996.414.9
Google Scholar

Rokka V.M.,Tauriainen A., Pietila, Pehu E. 1998. Interspecific somatic hybrids between wild potato Solanum acaule Bitt. and anther-derived dihaploid potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plant Cell Reports 18: 82 — 88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050536
Google Scholar

Rustanius P., Hang A., Hughes H. G., Tsuchiya T. 1991. Chromosome analysis of Alstroemeria ligtu hybrids. HortScience 26: 902 — 904 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.26.7.902
Google Scholar

Santos J. L., Lacadena J. R., Cermeiro M.C., Orellona J. 1984. Nuclear organizer activity in wheat-barley chromosome addition lines. Heredity 52: 425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1984.50
Google Scholar

Sarmah, B., K., Sarla N. 1998. Erucastrum abyssinicum × Brassica oleracea hybrids by ovary and ovule culture. Euphytica 102: 37 — 45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018384502884
Google Scholar

Schwarzacher T., Leitch A. R., Heslop-Harrison J. S. 1994. DNA-DNA in situ hybridization — methods for light microscopy. In: Plant cell biology: a practical approach, Harris N., Oparka K. (eds.), Oxford University Press: 127 — 155.
Google Scholar

Sigareva M. A., Earle E. D. 1999. Regeneration of plants from protoplasts of Capsella bursa-pastoris and somatic hybridization with rapid cycling Brassica oleracea. Plant Cell Reports 18: 412 — 417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050595
Google Scholar

Smyth D. R., Kongsuwan K. 1980. C-bands in lily chromosomes, and their use in identification of hybrids. The Lily Yearbook NALS 33: 83 — 86.
Google Scholar

Smyth D. R., Kongsuwan K., Wisudharomin S. 1991. A survey of C-band patterns in chromosomes of Lilium (Liliaceae). The Lily Yearbook NALS 44: 107 — 118.
Google Scholar

Słomski R., Napierała D., Kwiatkowska J. 1998. Reakcja łańcuchowa polimerazy (PCR) w badaniach naukowych i diagnostyce molekularnej. Postępy Biologii Komórki 25, Suppl. 10: 195 — 217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006863303503
Google Scholar

Szklarczyk M. 1996. Markery izoenzymatyczne. W: Zastosowanie metod biotechnologicznych w hodowli roślin. Michalik B. (red.), Drukrol, Kraków: 90 — 93.
Google Scholar

Tian D., Rose R. J. 1999. Asymmetric somatic hybridisation between the annual legumes Medicago truncatula and Medicago scutellata. Plant Cell Reports 18: 989 — 996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050696
Google Scholar

Uhring J. 1968. Hybridizing experiments with Lilium × Black Beauty. The Lily Yearbook NALS 21: 44 — 52.
Google Scholar

Vazquez-Thello A., Yang L.J., Hidaka M., Uozumi T. 1996. Inherited chilling tolerance in somatic hybrids of transgenic Hibiscus rosa-sinentis × transgenic Lavatera thuringiaca selected by double-antibiotic resistance. Plant Cell Reports 15: 506 — 511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232983
Google Scholar

Weber S., Horn R., Friedt W. 2000. High regeneration potential in vitro of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) lines derived from interspecific hybridization. Euphytica 116: 271 — 280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004061632736
Google Scholar

Weeden N. F., Lamb R. C. 1985. Identification of apple cultivars by isozyme phenotypes. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 110: 509 — 515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.110.4.509
Google Scholar

Wiejacha K., Marasek A., Sabała I., Orlikowska T. 2001 a. Molecular markers in detection of distant hybrids in Lilium. Acta Horticulturae 546: 281 — 285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.546.34
Google Scholar

Wiejacha K., Pluta S., Golis A., Orlikowska T. 2001 b. Identyfikacja mieszańców porzeczki czarnej przy pomocy markerów RAPD. Folia Horticulturae 13/1A: 183 — 188.
Google Scholar

Wiejacha K., Pluta S., Golis A., Orlikowska T. 2001 c. Investigation on molecular markers for characterization of parental genotypes used in Ribes sexual hybridization. Acta Horticulturae: 185 — 188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.560.33
Google Scholar

Wojciechowska B. 1996. Hybrids of tetraploid Aegilops sp. with Secale cereale. J. Appl. Genetics 37A: 174 — 178.
Google Scholar

Wolko B., Kruszka K., 1997. Markery molekularne w badaniach zmienności genetycznej roślin. Post. Nauk Rol. 3: 3 — 20.
Google Scholar

Wolters A.M., Jacobsen E., O’Connell M., Bonnema G., Sree Ramulu K., de Jong H., Schoenmakers H., Wijbrandi J.,Koornneef M. 1994. Somatic hybridization as a tool for tomato breeding. Euphytica 79: 265 — 277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00022527
Google Scholar

Yabuya T., Noda T. 1998. The characterization of autoallotetraploid hybrids between Iris ensata Thunb. and I. laevigata Fisch. Euphytica 103: 325 — 328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018694817359
Google Scholar

Zenkteler M. 2001. Kultura zalążków, zalążni, i zarodków. W: Biotechnologia roślin. Malepszy S. (red.). PWN, Warszawa: 70 — 86.
Google Scholar

Zwierzykowski Z., Lukaszewski A. J., Lesniewska A., Naganowska B. 1998. Genomic structure of androgenic progeny of pentaploid hybrids, Festuca arundinacea × Lolium multiflorum. Plant Breeding 117: 457 — 462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1998.tb01973.x
Google Scholar