Ocena jakości technologicznej rodów pszenicy jarej na potrzeby programu hodowlanego

Ahmad S., Pasha I., Saeed M., Shahid M., 2017. Principal component analysis and correlation studies of spring wheat in relation to cookie making quality. International Journal of Food Properties, Col. 20 (10): 2299‒2313.
Google Scholar

Alamri M., Manthey F., Mergoum M., Elias E., Khan K., 2009a. Assessing spring wheat quality using the glutograph instrument. Cereal Foods World, Vol. 54 (3): 124‒131.
Google Scholar

Alamri M., Manthey F., Mergoum M., Elias E., Khan K., 2009b. Use of the glutograph instrument in durum wheat quality evaluation. Plant Sciences Research, 2 (3): 23‒32.
Google Scholar

Anonim, 2017. Glutograph-E. Testing the quality of wet and dry gluten. Materiały informacyjne firmy Brabender® GmbH & Co. KG.
Google Scholar

Blumenthal C.S., Barlow E.W.R., Wrigley C.W., 1993. Growth environment and wheat quality: the effect of heat stress on dough properties and gluten proteins. Journal of Cereal Science, 18, 3‒21.
Google Scholar

Cato L., Mullan D., 2020. Chapter 8 – Wheat quality: wheat breeding and quality testing in Australia.W: Breadmaking, edytor: Cauvain S.P., 221‒259. Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition, Woodhead Publishing.
Google Scholar

Cecchini C., Bresciani A., Menesatti P., Pagani M.A., Marti A., 2021. Assessing the Rheological Properties of Durum Wheat Semolina: A Review. Foods. 10 (12): 2947. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10122947
Google Scholar

Codina G.G., Mironeasa S., Bordei D., Leahu A., 2010. Mixolab versus alveograph and falling number. Czech Journal of Food Sciences 28 (3): 185‒191.
Google Scholar

Daniel C., Triboi E., 2000. Effect of temperature and nitrogen nutrition on the grain composition of winter wheat: effects on gliadin content and composition. Journal of Cereal Science, 32, 45‒56.
Google Scholar

Kaplan-Evlice A., Pehlivan A., Külen S., Keçeli A., Şanal T., Karaca K., Salantur, A., 2016. Ekmeklik Buğday (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotiplerinde Ekmek Hacmi ve Bazı Kalite Parametreleri Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25 (special issue-1), 12‒18.
Google Scholar

Kaplan-Evlice A., Pehlivan A., Sanal T. Salantur A., Kilic G., Dugan C., Boyaci I.H., Koksel H., 2020 Utilization potential of Glutograph in wheat breeding programs and the influence of genotype and environment on bread wheat quality. Cereal Chem. 97: 634– 641.
Google Scholar

Kaya A., 2018. Nohudun Erişte Kalitesine Etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Harran Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitutisi. Şanlıurfa, 137 s.
Google Scholar

Keçeli A., Kaplan-Evlice A., Pehlivan A., Şanal T., Karaca K., Külen S., Seis-Subaşı A., Salanturksu A., 2017. Ekmeklik Buğdayda (Triticum aestivum L.) Zeleny Sedimantasyon Analizi ve Diğer Kalite Paramatreleri ile İlişkisinin İncelenm. Journal of Nature and Science, 20, 292‒296.
Google Scholar

Lorenz K., Roewe-Smith P., Kulp K., Bates L., 1983. Preharvest sprouting of winter wheat. II. Amino acid composition and functionality of flour and flour fractions. Cereal Chemistry, 60, 360‒366.
Google Scholar

Lukow O.M., Bushuk W., 1984. Influence of germination on wheat quality. I. Functional (breadmaking) and biochemical properties. Cereal Chemistry, 61, 336‒339.
Google Scholar

Matuz J., Markovics E., Acs E., Veha A., 1999. Study of relationships between the technological quality characters of flour of winter wheat cultivars (in Hungarian). Novenytermeles, 48, 243‒253.
Google Scholar

Miś A., 2005. Wpływ wybranych czynników na wodochłonność i właściwości reologiczne glutenu pszenicy zwyczajnej (Triticum aestivum L.). Acta Agrophysica, Rozprawy i Monografie 2005 (8).
Google Scholar

Newberry M., Zwart A.B., Whan A., Mieog J.C., Sun M., Leyne E., Pritchard J., Daneri-Castro S.N., Ibrahim K., Diepeveen D., Howitt C.A., Ral J.-P.F., 2018. Does Late Maturity Alpha-Amylase Impact Wheat Baking Quality? Frontiers in Plant Science, Vol. 9. 1356.
Google Scholar

Peňa R.J., Posadas-Romano G., Espinosa-Garcia B.M., Dubat A., 2007. Evaluation of gluten and starch quality parameters with the Chopin – Mixolab and other traditional flour and dough testing instruments. Conferencia Internacional Cereales y Productos de Cereales Calidad e Inocuidad 1; Rosario (Argentina): 23‒26.
Google Scholar

PN-EN ISO 21415‒2:2015‒12, 2015. Pszenica i mąka pszenna – Ilość glutenu – Część 2: Oznaczanie glutenu mokrego i indeksu glutenu za pomocą urządzeń mechanicznych.
Google Scholar

PN-EN ISO 27971:2015‒07, 2015. Ziarno zbóż i przetwory zbożowe – Pszenica zwyczajna (Triticum aestivum L.) – Oznaczanie właściwości alweograficznych ciasta przy stałym dodatku wody dla mąki handlowej lub laboratoryjnej oraz procedura przemiału laboratoryjnego.
Google Scholar

Rakita S., Torbica A.M., Dokić L.P., Tomić J.M., Pojić M.M, Hadnađev M.S., Dapčević Hadnađev T.R., 2015. Alpha-amylase activity in wheat flour and breadmaking properties in relation to different climatic conditions. Food and Feed Research, 42 (2): 91‒99.
Google Scholar

Szafrańska A., Stępniewska S.M., 2021. Changes in bread making quality of wheat during postharvest maturations. International Agrophysics. 35 (2): 179‒185.
Google Scholar

Yang Y., Chai Y., Zhang X., Lu S., Zhao Z., Wei D., Chen L., Hu Y.-G., 2020. Multi-Locus GWAS of Quality Traits in Bread Wheat: Mining More Candidate Genes and Possible Regulatory Network. Frontiers in Plant Science, Vol. 11, 1091, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2020.01091
Google Scholar

Yıldırım A., Atasoy A.F., 2020. Quality characteristics of some durum wheat varieties grown in Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey (GAP). Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, 24 (4): 420- 431. DOI: 10.29050/harranziraat.738505.
Google Scholar

Zaharia D., Danciu I., Codina G.G., Mironeasa S., Mironeasa C., 2014. Relationships of glutograph parameters with farinograph and wheat flour characteristics. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 12 (1): 33‒36.
Google Scholar