Structure analysis of carabid beetles (Col., Carabidae) assemblages in integrated and organic potato management - Short communictaion

Agnieszka Kosewska

a.kosewska@uwm.edu.pl
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie (Poland)

Katarzyna Nijak


Instytut Ochrony Roślin — Państwowy Instytut Badawczy w Poznaniu (Poland)

Abstract

Epigeic carabid beetles are potential enemies of plant pests. In this study, indirect influence of chemical protection in integrated potato management on carabids was investigated. Obtained result was compared with an organic field. The study was conducted in Winna Góra near Środa Wielkopolska from 19. May to 8. September 2008. Two potato fields were selected: one with organic and one with integrated-management cultivation system . Ten Barber traps were placed on each field. In total, 2.889 specimens representing 32 species (Carabide family) were captured. Harpalus rufipes was the dominating species (approx. 50%). No significant negative impact on beneficial ground beetles assemblages of pesticides was found.


Keywords:

carabid beetles, chemical protection, potato crops

Aleksandrowicz O., Pakuła B., Mazur J. 2008. Biegaczowate (Coleoptera: Carabidae) w uprawie pszenicy w okolicy Lęborka. Słupskie Prace Biologiczne 5: 15 — 25.
Google Scholar

Birkhofer K., Flieβbach A., Wise D. H., Scheu S. 2008. Generalist predators in organically and conventionally managed grass-clover fields: implications for conservation biological control. Ann. Appl. Biol. 153: 271 — 280.
Google Scholar

Bukejs A. 2009. Complex of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of potato fields agrocenosis in Eastern Latvia. Acta Zool. Lituan. 19 (3): 216 — 222.
Google Scholar

Clark M. S. 1999. Ground beetle abundance and community composition in conventional and organic tomato systems of California’s Central Valley. Appl. Soil Ecol. 11: 199 — 206.
Google Scholar

Czechowski W. 1981. Biegaczowate (Carabidae, Coleoptera). Fragm. Faun. 26 (12): 193 — 216.
Google Scholar

Górny M., Grüm 1981: Metody stosowane w zoologii gleby. PWN. Warszawa: 482 ss.
Google Scholar

Huruk S. 2006. Porównanie struktur zgrupowań biegaczowatych (Coleoptera: Carabidae) łąk kośnych oraz przylegających do nich pól uprawnych. Wiad. Entomol. 25, Supl. 1: 9 — 32.
Google Scholar

Huruk S. 2007. Dynamika łowności Harpalus rufipes DE GEER (Coleoptera: Carabidae) w jednorocznych uprawach rolnych w zależności od typu gleby. Wiad. Entomol. 26 (3): 135 — 152.
Google Scholar

Jaworska T. 1997. Wpływ odchwaszczania na dynamikę populacji biegaczowatych (Carabidae, Coleoptera). Progr. Plant Protect. 37 (2): 235 — 237.
Google Scholar

Jaworska T. 2001. Skład gatunkowy biegaczowatych (Carabidae, Coleoptera) w uprawie pszenicy ozimej odchwaszczanej Aminopielikiem D. Zesz. Nauk. Akad. Rolniczej w Krakowie 38: 42 — 47.
Google Scholar

Jaworska T. 2006. Wpływ zabiegów chemicznych w agrocenozach na chronione gatunki biegaczowatych (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Wiad. Entomol. 25, Supl. 2: 89 — 94.
Google Scholar

Kosewska A., Nietupski M., Laszczak-Dawid A., Ciepielewska D. 2008. Zgrupowania epigeicznych biegaczowatych (Col. Carabidae) wybranych agrocenoz. Prog. Plant Protect. 48 (4): 1304 — 1308.
Google Scholar

Kosewska A., Nietupski M., Ciepielewska D., Słomka W. 2009 Czynniki wpływające na struktury zgrupowań naziemnych biegaczowatych (Col., Carabidae) w wybranych uprawach zbóż. Prog. Plant Protect. 49 (3): 1035 — 1046.
Google Scholar

Kowalska J., Kühne S. 2010. Effect of biological plant protection products on beneficial insects in organic potatoes crops. Journal of Research Apll. in Agr. Engin. 55 (3): 191 — 194.
Google Scholar

Kromp B. 1990. Carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) as bioindicators in biological and conventional farming in Austrian potato fields. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 9: 182 — 187.
Google Scholar

Luff M. L. 1980. The biology of the ground beetle Harpalus rufipes of a strawberry field in Northumberland. Ann. Appl. Biol. 94: 153 — 164.
Google Scholar

Nijak K. 2009. Wpływ technologii uprawy roślin okopowych na dynamikę liczebności chrząszczy biegaczowatych (Carabidae). Prog. Plant Protect. 49 (3): 1485 — 1489.
Google Scholar

Pałosz T. 1996. Skład gatunkowy biegaczowatych (Col., Carabidae) na plantacjach rzepaku ozimego w sezonie 1994/1995. Prog. Plant Protest. 36 (2): 79 — 81.
Google Scholar

Ter Braak C.J.F., P.S. Milauer. 1998. CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, USA: 352 pp.
Google Scholar

Thiele H. U. 1977. Carabid beetles in their environments. Springer – Verlag, pp. 329.
Google Scholar

Traugott M. 1998. Larval and adult species composition, phenology and life cycles of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in an organic potato field. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 34 (4): 198 — 197.
Google Scholar

Werling B. P., Gratton C. 2008. Influence of field margins and landscape context on ground beetle diversity in Wisconsin (USA) potato fields. Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 128: 104 — 108.
Google Scholar


Published
2012-09-30

Cited by

Kosewska, A. and Nijak, K. (2012) “Structure analysis of carabid beetles (Col., Carabidae) assemblages in integrated and organic potato management - Short communictaion”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (265), pp. 157–164. doi: 10.37317/biul-2012-0049.

Authors

Agnieszka Kosewska 
a.kosewska@uwm.edu.pl
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie Poland

Authors

Katarzyna Nijak 

Instytut Ochrony Roślin — Państwowy Instytut Badawczy w Poznaniu Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 44
PDF downloads: 52


License

Copyright (c) 2012 Agnieszka Kosewska, Katarzyna Nijak

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.