Comparison of parametric and non-parametric stability measures on the basis of data from preliminary trials with winter rye
Joanna Ukalska
joanna_ukalska@sggw.edu.plKatedra Ekonometrii i Statystyki, Zakład Biometrii, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie (Poland)
Tadeusz Śmiałowski
Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — PIB, Zakład Roślin Zbożowych w Krakowie (Poland)
Krzysztof Ukalski
Katedra Ekonometrii i Statystyki, Zakład Biometrii, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie (Poland)
Abstract
Yield stability of 12 open-pollinated and 18 hybrid genotypes of winter rye was assessed in preliminary trials conducted in 6 locations in 2009. The aim of this work was to compare parametric and non-parametric stability measures and to indicate stable and high yielding genotypes of winter rye. On the basis of hierarchical cluster analysis 17 stability measures were classified into three groups. The first group related to the dynamic concept of stability and strongly correlated with mean yield included the parameters: Pi, Di, YS and TOP; the second group — stability measures pointing stable genotypes with average yield included: bi, α Si2 i CV; the third group — stability measures reflecting the concept of static stability and indicating genotypes for extensive cultivation included Si(1), Si(2), Si(3) i Si(6), Sdi2, λ, θ, Wi i D2. Among the open-pollinated genotypes stable and high yielding ones were CHD62 and CHD 43. On account of average yield open-pollinated line CHD 17 can be used in extensive cultivation. High yielding and highly stable hybrid lines destined for intensive cultivation were CHD 548, CHD 516, CHD 621, SMH 8121 i SMH 8240.
Keywords:
cluster analysis, grain yield, hybrid lines, open-pollinated lines, parametric and non-parametric stability measures, winter ryeReferences
Becker H. B., Leon J. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breed. 101: — 23.
Google Scholar
Bhargava A., Shukla S., Ohri D. 2008. Genotype environment interaction studies in Chenopodium album L.: an underutilized crop with promising potential. Communications in Biometry and Crop Sci. 3 (1): 3 — 15.
Google Scholar
Bujak H., Jedyński S., Kaczmarek J. 2008. Ocena stabilności plonowania odmian żyta ozimego na podstawie parametrycznych i nieparametrycznych metod. Biul. IHAR 250: 189 — 201.
Google Scholar
Eberhart S. A., Russell W. A. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6: 36 — 40.
Google Scholar
Fox P. N., Skovmand B., Thompson B. K. Braun H. J., Cormier R. 1990. Yield and adaptation of hexaploid spring triticale. Euphytica 47: 57 — 64.
Google Scholar
Francis T. R., Kannenberg L.W. 1978. Yield stability studies in short-season maize I. A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58: 1029 — 1034.
Google Scholar
Gauch H. G. 2006. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Sci. 46: 1488–1500.
Google Scholar
Hühn M. 1990. Non-parametric measures of phenotypic stability: part 1. Theory. Euphytica 47: 189 — 194.
Google Scholar
Hernandez C. M., Crossa J., Castillo A. 1993. The area under the function: an index for selecting desirable genotypes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87: 409 — 415.
Google Scholar
Kang M. S., Pham H. N. 1991. Simultaneous selection for high yielding and stable crop genotypes. Agron. J. 83: 161 — 165.
Google Scholar
Lin C. S., Binns M. R. 1988. A superiority measure of cultivar performance for cultivar x location data. Can. J. Plant Sci. 68: 193 — 198.
Google Scholar
Lin, C. S., Binns M.R., Lefkovitch L. P. 1986. Stability analysis: Where do we stand? Crop Sci. 26: 894 — 900.
Google Scholar
Mohammadi R., Amri A. 2008. Comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods for selecting stable and adapted durum wheat genotypes in variable environments. Euphytica 159: 419 — 432.
Google Scholar
Mut Z., Gülümser A., Sirat A. 2010. Comparison of stability statistics for yield in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). African Journal of Biotechnology 9 (11): 1610 — 1618.
Google Scholar
Nassar, R. Hühn M. 1987. Studies on estimation of phenotypic stability: Tests of significance for nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Biometrics 43: 45 — 53.
Google Scholar
Plaisted R. L. 1960. A shorter method for evaluating the ability of selections to yield consistently over locations. Am. Potato J. 37: 166 — 172.
Google Scholar
Piepho H. P. 1998. Methods for comparing the yield stability of cropping systems: A review. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 180: 193 — 213.
Google Scholar
Piepho H. P., Lotito S. 1992. Rank correlation among parametric and nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Euphytica 64: 221 — 225.
Google Scholar
Sabaghnia N., Dehghani H., Sbaghpour H. 2006. Nonparametric methods for interpreting genotype × environment interaction of lentil genotypes. Crop Sci. 46: 1100 — 1106.
Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 2008 a. SAS/IML® 9.2 User’s Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 2008 b. SAS/STAT® 9.2 User’s Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
Google Scholar
Śmiałowski T., Węgrzyn S. 2001. Przydatność punktów doświadczalnych do oceny materiałów hodowlanych żyta ozimego. Biul. IHAR 218/219: 409 — 417.
Google Scholar
Tai G. C. C. 1971. Genotypic stability analysis and its application to potato regional trials. Crop Sci. 11: 184 — 190.
Google Scholar
Wricke G. 1962. Bei eine Methode zur Erfassung der ökologischen Streubreite in Feldversuchen. Z. Pflanzenzüchtg. 47: 92 — 96.
Google Scholar
Zobel R. W., Wright M .J., Gauch H. G. Jr. 1988. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agron. J. 80: 388 — 393.
Google Scholar
Authors
Joanna Ukalskajoanna_ukalska@sggw.edu.pl
Katedra Ekonometrii i Statystyki, Zakład Biometrii, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie Poland
Authors
Tadeusz ŚmiałowskiInstytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — PIB, Zakład Roślin Zbożowych w Krakowie Poland
Authors
Krzysztof UkalskiKatedra Ekonometrii i Statystyki, Zakład Biometrii, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie Poland
Statistics
Abstract views: 38PDF downloads: 43
License
Copyright (c) 2011 Joanna Ukalska, Tadeusz Śmiałowski, Krzysztof Ukalski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:
- Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
- Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
- Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
- Including the article in a collective work.
- Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
- Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
- Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.
Authors by sending a request for publication:
- They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
- They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
- They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
- They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
- They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.
