Estimation of variability on phenotypic and molecular level of spherical-seeded form of grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.)

Katarzyna Pankiewicz

office@igr.poznan.pl
Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN, Poznań (Poland)

Wojciech Rybiński


Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN, Poznań (Poland)

Zygmunt Kaczmarek


Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN, Poznań (Poland)

Abstract

A mutant with spherical seeds was investigated together with two Polish cultivars: Derek and Krab (most probable ancestors of the mutant) as well as an Italian grasspee line, typical for South-Western Europe (Mediterranean Basin region). Variation of traits on phenotypic level was estimated basing on results obtained from field trials conducted in four locations in 2008 and 2009. The multivariate analysis method was used. Genetic variation, expressed by degree of genetic similarity, was established with the use of ISSR markers. Moreover, content of protein, fat, fatty acid composition and neurotoxin content (β-ODAP) in seeds was estimated. The obtained results indicated, that the spherical-seeded mutant, as compared to the cultivars Derek and Krab, was significantly different in the following traits: number of branches and pods per plant, pod length, weight of seeds per pod, seeds number per plant, as well as weight of 1000 seeds. Moreover, all three Polish forms represented different morphotype and yield structure parameters than the Italian line. The seeds of spherical-seeded mutant showed higher content of protein and fat as compared to another analyzed forms, with domination of oleic acid in fatty acids composition. All Polish accessions were similar in neurotoxin content in seeds, markedly lower in comparison to the Italian line. Results of hierarchical grouping (after use of the ISSR method) were presented on the dendrogram which indicated that the cultivars and spherical-seeded mutant showed high level of genetic similarity and markedly differed from the Italian line. The results obtained on the phenotypic level from field trials, estimated with use of multivariate statistics, indicated the population from which the cultivar Derek was derived as the most probable ancestor of the spherical seed mutant, however on the molecular level the mutant showed closer genetic similarity to the cultivar Krab.


Keywords:

Lathyrus sativus, chemical composition of seeds, field trials, ISSR markers, spherical-seeded mutant, yield-contributing traits

Allkin R., MacFarlane T. D., White F. A., Bisby F. A., Adey M. E. 1983. Names and synonyms of species and subspecies in Vicieae. Issue 2, Vicieae database project publication No. 2, Southampton, UK.
Google Scholar

Briggs C. J., Parenno N., Campbell C. G. 1983. Photochemical assessment of Lathyrus species for the neurotoxin agent , β — N — oxalyl — 1 — α.β — diaminopropionic acid. Planta Med. 47: 188 — 190.
Google Scholar

Caliński T., Dyczkowska A., Kaczmarek Z. 1976. Hypothesis testing in multivariable analysis of variance and covariance. Algorytmy Biometrii i Statystyki. Zeszyt 5: 77 — 113.
Google Scholar

Campbell, C. G. 1987. Registration of low neurotoxin content Lathyrus germplasm LS8246. Crop Sci. 27: 821
Google Scholar

Campbell C. G., Mehra R. B., Agrawal S. K., Chen Y. Z., Abd El Moneim A., Khawaja H. I. T., Yadow C. R., Tay J. U., ArayaW. A. 1994. Current status and future strategy in breeding grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Euphytica 73: 167 — 175.
Google Scholar

Campbell, C. G., 1997. Grass pea. Lathyrus sativus L. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. 18. Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research. Gatersleben/International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy.
Google Scholar

Camussi A., Ottaviano E., Caliński T., Kaczmarek Z. 1985. Genetic distance based on quantitative traits. Genetics 111: 945 — 962.
Google Scholar

Ceranka B., Chudzik H., Czajka S., Kaczmarek Z. 1997. Wielozmienna analiza wariancji dla doświadczeń wieloczynnikowych. Algorytmy Biometrii i Statystyki. Zeszyt 6: 51 — 60.
Google Scholar

De La Rossa L., Martin I. 2001. Morphological characterisation of Spanish genetic resources of Lathyrus sativus L. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter 2: 31–34.
Google Scholar

Desphande S. S., Campbell C. G. 1992. Genotype variation in BOAA, condensed tannins, phenolics and enzyme inhibitors in grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Can. J. Plant Sci.72: 1037 — 1047.
Google Scholar

Duke J. A. 1981. Handbook of Legumes of World Economic Importance. Plenum Press, New York.
Google Scholar

Dziamba S. 1997. Biologia i agrotechnika lędźwianu siewnego. Międzynarodowe Sympozjum Naukowe „Lędźwian siewny — agrotechnika i wykorzystanie w żywieniu zwierząt i ludzi”, Radom, 9–10 czerwca 1997: 27 — 33.
Google Scholar

Grela E., Winiarska A. 1997. Skład chemiczny i wartość pokarmowa nasion lędźwianu siewnego (Lathyrus sativus L.). Międzynarodowe Sympozjum Naukowe „Lędźwian siewny – agrotechnika i wykorzystanie w żywieniu zwierząt i ludzi”, Radom, 9–10 czerwca 1997: 49 — 58.
Google Scholar

Grela E., Rybiński W., Klebaniuk R., Matras J. 2010, Morphological characteristics of some accessions in grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) grown in Europe and nutritional traits their seeds. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 57 (5): 693 — 701.
Google Scholar

Hammer K., Laghetti G., Perrino P. 1989. Collection of plant genetic resources in South Italy, 1988. Kulturpflanzen 37: 401 — 414.
Google Scholar

Hanbury C. D., Sarker A., Siddique K. H. M., Perry M. W. 1995. Evaluation of Lathyrus germplasm in a Mediterranean type environment in South-Western Australia. Co-operative Research Center for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture, Occasional Paper: 8.
Google Scholar

Hanbury C. D, White C.L., Mullan B.P., Siddique K. H. M. 2000. A review of the potential of Lathyrus sativus L. and L. cicera L. grain for use as animal feed. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 87: 1 — 27.
Google Scholar

Jeswani L. M., Lal B. M., Shiv Prakash S. 1970. Study on the development of low neurotoxin (β-N-Oxalylamino alanine) lines in Lathyrus sativus (Khesari). Current Science 22: 518.
Google Scholar

Kaul A. K., Islam M. Q., Hamid S. 1985. In: A. K. Kaul & D. Combes (Eds.), Lathyrus and lathyrism, proceedings at Collogue Lathyrus. Third World Medical Research Foundation, New York: 234 pp.
Google Scholar

Kozak M., Bocianowski J., Rybiński W. 2008. Selection of promising genotypes based on path and cluster analyses. J. Agric. Sci., 146: 85 — 92.
Google Scholar

Mehra R. B., Raju D.B., Himabindu K. 1995. Evaluation and utilization of Lathyrus sativus collection in India. In: Lathyrus Genetic Resources in Asia. Proc. Reg. Workshop, December 27–29, Raipur, India.
Google Scholar

Milczak M, Pędziński M, Mnichowska H, Szwed-Urbaś K. 1997. Hodowla twórcza lędźwianu siewnego (Lathyrus sativus L.) — podsumowanie pierwszego etapu. Międzynarodowe Sympozjum Naukowe „Lędźwian siewny – agrotechnika i wykorzystanie w żywieniu zwierząt i ludzi”, Radom, 9-10 czerwca 1997: 13 — 22.
Google Scholar

Milczak M., Pędziński M., Mnichowska H., Szwed-Urbaś K., Rybiński W. 2001. Creative breeding of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus) in Poland. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter 2: 85 — 88.
Google Scholar

Murray M. G., Thompson W. F. 1980 Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucl. Acids Res. 8: 4321 — 4325.
Google Scholar

Nei M., Li W. H. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction. Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USA 76: 5269 — 5273.
Google Scholar

Pandey R. L., Agraval S. K., Chitale M. W., Sharma R. N., Kashyap O. P., Geda A. K., Chandrakar H. K., Agrawal K. K. 1995. Catalogue of grasspea (L. sativus L.) germplasm. Gandhi Agric. Univ. Press, Raipur, India.
Google Scholar

Pankiewicz K., Rybiński W. 2008. Ocena zróżnicowania genetycznego i zawartości neurotoksyny β-ODAP w wybranych gatunkach z rodzaju Lathyrus. Biul. IHAR 250: 287 — 295.
Google Scholar

Petterson D. S., Sipsas S., Mackintosh J. B. 1997. The chemical composition and nutritive value of Australian pulses. Grains Research and Development Corporation, Canberra.
Google Scholar

Rao S. L. N. 1978. A sensitive and specific colorimetric method for determination of α,β-diaminopropionic acid and Lathyrus sativus neurotoxin. Anal. Biochem. 86: 386 — 395.
Google Scholar

Ravindran V., Blair R. 1992. Feed resources for poultry production in Asia and the Pacific. II. Plant protein sources. World Poult. Sci. J. 48: 205 — 231.
Google Scholar

Rencher A. C. 1992. Interpretation of canonical discriminant functions, canonical variants, and principal components. Am. Stat. 46: 217 — 225.
Google Scholar

Rybiński W., Grela E. R. 2007. Zróżnicowanie genetyczne cech i składu chemicznego nasion mutantów lędźwianu siewnego (Lathyrus sativus L.). Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln. 517: 613 — 627.
Google Scholar

Rybinski W., Szot B., Rusinek R. 2008. Estimation of morphological traits and mechanical properties of grasspea seeds (Lathyrus sativus L.) originating from EU countries. International Agrophysics 22 (3): 261 — 275.
Google Scholar

Sarwar C. D. M., Sarkar A., Murshed A. N. M. M., Malik M. A., 1995. Variation in natural population of grass pea. In: Lathyrus sativus and Human Lathyrism. Progress and Prospects. Proc. 2nd Int. Colloq. Lathyrus Lathyrism, 10–12 December 1993, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Google Scholar

Smartt J. 1984. Evolution of Grain Legumes. I. Mediterranean Pulses. Experimental Agriculture 20: 275 — 296.
Google Scholar

Smulikowska S., Rybiński W., Czerwiński J., Taciak M., Mieczkowska A. 2008. Evaluation of selected mutant of grasspea (Lathyrus dativus L.) var. Krab as an ingredient in broiler chicken diet. J. Animal Feed Sci. 17: 75 — 87.
Google Scholar

Tavoletti S., Capitani E. 2000. Field evaluation of grass pea population collected in the Marche region (Italy). Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter 1: 17 — 20.
Google Scholar

Williams P.C., Bhatty R. S., Deshpande S. S., Hussein L. A., Savage G. P. 1994. Improving nutritional quality of cool season food legumes. In: Muehlbauer F.J. and Kaiser W.J. (eds), Exfuture panding the Production and Use of Cool Season Food Legumes. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands: 113 — 129.
Google Scholar

Vaz Patto M. C., Skiba B., Pang E.C.K., Ochatt S. J., Lambein F., Rubiales D. 2006. Lathyrus improvement for resistance against biotic and abiotic stresses: From classical breeding to marker assisted selection. Euphytica 147: 133 — 147.
Google Scholar

Yadov C. R. 1995. Genetic evaluation and varietal improvement of grasspea in Nepal. In: Lathyrus Genetic Resources in Asia. Proc. Reg. Workshop, December 27–29, Raipur, India.
Google Scholar


Published
2011-09-30

Cited by

Pankiewicz, K., Rybiński, W. and Kaczmarek, Z. (2011) “Estimation of variability on phenotypic and molecular level of spherical-seeded form of grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.)”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (260/261), pp. 351–365. doi: 10.37317/biul-2011-0049.

Authors

Katarzyna Pankiewicz 
office@igr.poznan.pl
Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN, Poznań Poland

Authors

Wojciech Rybiński 

Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN, Poznań Poland

Authors

Zygmunt Kaczmarek 

Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN, Poznań Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 243
PDF downloads: 39


License

Copyright (c) 2011 Katarzyna Pankiewicz, Wojciech Rybiński, Zygmunt Kaczmarek

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.