Immunocytochemical localization of pectin and arabinogalactan protein epitopes in regenerating tissues of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)

Magdalena Tomaszewska-Sowa

Magdalena.Tomaszewska-Sowa@pbs.edu.pl
Katedra Fizjologii i Podstaw Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Technologiczno — Przyrodniczy, Bydgoszcz (Poland)

Abstract

Pectin and arabinogalactan proteins, which are components of the cell wall, are significantly associated with the regulation processes of morphogenesis and differentiation of plants. The aim of this study was to characterize the location of the epitopes of pectins and arabinogalactan proteins in tissues of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) regenerating from unfertilized ovules in in vitro cultures. Considering previous results of immunocytochemical analysis of tissues of sugar beet it seemed important to determine the differences in distribution of these compounds in the cells of sugar beet depending on the type of tissue and medium components that determine the regeneration of explants in in vitro cultures. The presence of specific epitopes was determined in callus tissue with visible meristematic regions , as well as in somatic embryos at torpedo stage, growing in the culture of unfertilized ovules. Detection was conducted using specific monoclonal antibodies, and the location of specific oligosaccharide antigens was visualized in situ by reaction with secondary antibodies conjugated with alkaline phosphatase. It has been shown that the four epitopes typical for pectin, which react with antibodies JIM5, JIM7, LM5 and LM6 are common in all examined tissues and cell types. Among the AGP epitopes that typify arabinogalactan proteins there were distinguished those that occur in callus in relatively large quantities (LM2, and JIM14 JIM13), or only in trace amounts, or which in general are not present. In the control reaction, performed without the incubation stage of the primary antibody, the sections were obtained which showed no signs of coloration or minimally colored, which indicates specificity of the immunocytochemistry procedures.


Keywords:

sugar beet, in vitro culture, pectin, proteoglycans AGPs (arabinogalactan proteins), seeds, somatic embryos

Berger F., Taylor A., Brownlee C. 1994. Cell fate determination by the cell wall in early Fucus development. Science 263: 1421 — 1423.
Google Scholar

Brownlee C., Berger F. 1995. Extracellular matrix and pattern in plant embryos — on the lookout for developmental information. Trends Genet. 11: 344 — 348.
Google Scholar

Butowt R., Niklas A., Rodriguez-Garcia M. I., Majewska-Sawka A. 1999. Involvement of JIM13-and JIM8-responsive carbohydrate epitopes in early stages of cell wall formation. J. Plant Res. 112: 107 — 116.
Google Scholar

Carpita N. C., Gibeaut D. M. 1993. Structural models of primary cell walls in flowering plants: consistency of molecular structure with the physical properties of the walls during growth. Plant J. 3: 1 — 30.
Google Scholar

Chapman A., Blervacq A. S., Vasseur J., Hillbert J. L. 2000. Arabinogalactan-proteins in Cichorium somatic embryogenesis: effect of β-glucosyl Yariv reagent and epitope localisation during embryo development. Planta 211: 305 — 314.
Google Scholar

Clausen M. H., Willats W. G. T., Knox J. P. 2003. Synthetic methyl hexagalacturonate hapten inhibitors of anti – homologalacturonan monoclonal antibodies LM7, JIM15 and JIM7. Carbohydr. Res. 338: 1797 — 1800.
Google Scholar

David H., David A., Bade P., Millet J., Morvan O., Morvan C. 1994. Cell wall composition and morphogenic response in callus derived from protoplasts of two fibre flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) genotypes. J. Plant. Physiol. 143: 379 — 384.
Google Scholar

Eberhard S., Doubrava N., Marfa V., Mohnen D., Southwick A., Darvill A., Albersheim P. 1989. Pectic cell wall fragments regulate tobacco thin-cell-layer explant morphogenesis. Plant Cell 1: 747 — 755.
Google Scholar

Egertsdotter U., von Arnold S. 1995. Importance of arabinogalactan proteins for the development of somatic embryos of Norway spruce (Picea abies). Physiol. Plant. 93: 334 — 345.
Google Scholar

Fry S.C. 1995. Polysaccharide-modifying enzymes in the plant cell wall. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 46: 497 — 520.
Google Scholar

Hengel van A., Tadesse Z., Immerzeel P., Schols H., van Kammen A., de Vries S. 2001. N-acetylglucosamine and glucosamine-containing arabinogalactan proteins control somatic embryogenesis. Plant Physiol. 125: 1880 — 1890.
Google Scholar

Jones L., Seymour G. B., Knox J. P. 1997. Localization of pectic galactan in tomato cell walls using a monoclonal antibody specific to (1 → 4) – β – D – galactan. Plant Physiol. 113: 1405 — 1412.
Google Scholar

Knox J. P., Linstead P. J., Peart J., Cooper C., Roberts K. 1991. Developmentally regulated epitopes of cell surface arabinogalactan proteins and their relation to root tissue pattern formation . Plant J. 1: 317 — 326.
Google Scholar

Konieczny R., Świerczyńska J., Czaplicki A. Z., Bohdanowicz J. 2007. Distribution of pectin and arabinogalactan protein epitopes during organogenesis from androgenic callus of wheat. Plant Cell Rep. 26: 355 — 363.
Google Scholar

Liners F., Gaspar T., Van Cutsem P. 1994. Acetyl- and methyl-esterification of pectins of friable and compact sugar-beet calli: consequences for intercellular adhesion. Planta 192: 545 — 556.
Google Scholar

Majewska-Sawka A., Münster A. 2003. Cell-wall antigens in mesophyll cells and mesophyll-derived protoplasts of sugar beet: possible implication in protoplast recalcitrance. Plant Cell Rep. 21: 946 — 954.
Google Scholar

Majewska-Sawka A., Rodriguez-Garcia M. I. 2006. Immunodetection of pectin and arabinogalactan protein epitopes during pollen exine formation of Beta vulgaris L. Protoplasma 228: 41 — 47.
Google Scholar

Malinowski R. Filipecki M. 2002. The role of cell wall in plant embryogenesis. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 7: 1137 — 1151.
Google Scholar

Murashige T., Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473 — 497.
Google Scholar

Nothnagel E. A. 1997. Proteoglycans and related components in plant cells. Int. Rev. Cytol. 174: 195 — 291.
Google Scholar

Pennell R. I., Janniche L., Kjellbom P., Scofield G. N., Peart J. M., Roberts K. 1991. Developmental regulation of plasma membrane arabinogalactan protein epitope in oilseed rape flowers. Plant Cell 3: 1317 — 1326.
Google Scholar

Roberts A. W., Donovan S. G., Haigler C. H. 1997. A secreted factor induces cell expansion and formation of metaxylem-like tracheary elements in xylogenic suspension cultures of Zinnia. Plant Physiol. 115: 683 — 692.
Google Scholar

Saare-Surmiński K., Preil W., Knox J. P., Lieberei R. 2000. Arabinogalactan proteins in embryogenic and non-embryogenic callus cultures of Euphorbia pulcherrima. Physiol. Plant. 108: 180 — 187.
Google Scholar

Samaj J., Terezia S., Matusova R., Salaj J.,Takac T., Samajova O., Volkmann D. 2008. Arabinogalactan-protein epitope Gal4 is differentially regulated and localized in cell lines of hybrid fir (Abies alba x Abies cephalonica ) with different embryogenic and regeneration potential. Plant Cell Rep. 27: 221 — 229.
Google Scholar

Smallwood M., Yates E., Willats W. G., Martin H., Knox P. 1996. Immunochemical comparison of membrane – associated and secreted arabinogalactan – proteins in rice and carrot. Planta 198: 452 — 459.
Google Scholar

Tang X.Ch., He Y.Q., Wang Y., Sun M.X. 2006. The role of arabinogalactan proteins binding to Yariv reagents in the initiation, cell developmental fate, and maintenance of microspore embryogenesis in Brassica napus L. cv. Topas. J. Exp. Bot.: 1 — 12.
Google Scholar

Toonen M.A.J., Schmidt E.D.L., van Kammen A., de Vries S.C. 1997. Promotive and inhibitiory effects of diverse arabinogalactan proteins on Daucus carota L. somatic embryogenesis. Planta 203: 188 — 195.
Google Scholar

Qin Y., Zhao J. 2006. Localization of arabinogalactan proteins in egg cells, zygotes, and two-celled proembryos and effects of β-D-glucosyl Yariv reagent on egg cell fertilization and zygote division in Nicotiana tabacum L. J. Exp. Bot. 57: 2061 — 2074.
Google Scholar

Varner J. E., Lin L. S. 1989. Plant cell wall architecture. Cell 56: 231 — 239.
Google Scholar

Willats W. G. T., Steele-King C. G., Marcus S. E., Knox J. P. 1999. Side chains of pectic polysaccharides are regulated in relation to cell proliferation and cell differentiation. Plant J. 20: 619 — 628.
Google Scholar

Willats W. G. T., Limberg G., Buchholt H. C., van Alebeek G. J., Benen J., Christensen T. M. I E., Visser J., Voragen A., Mikkelsen J. D., Knox J. P. 2000. Analysis of pectic epitopes recognized by hybridoma and phage display monoclonal antibodies using defined oligosaccharides, polysaccharides, and enzymatic degradation. Carbohydr. Res. 327:309 — 320.
Google Scholar

Yates E. A., Valdor J. F., Haslam S. M., Morris H. R., Dell A., Mackie W., Knox J. P. 1996. Characterization of carbohydrate structural features recognized by anti-arabinogalactan-protein monoclonal antibodies. Glycobiol. 2: 31 — 39.
Google Scholar

Wiśniewska E. 2006. Charakterystyka cytologiczna i genetyczna komórek o wysokim i niskim potencjale do regeneracji roślin in vitro (Nicotiana tabacum L. vs Beta vulgaris L.). Praca doktorska. IHAR. Bydgoszcz: 1 — 149.
Google Scholar

Wiśniewska E., Majewska-Sawka A. 2007. Arabinogalactan-proteins stimulate the organogenesis of guard cell protoplasts-derived callus in sugar beet. Plant Cell Rep. 26: 1457 — 1467.
Google Scholar


Published
2011-03-31

Cited by

Tomaszewska-Sowa, M. (2011) “Immunocytochemical localization of pectin and arabinogalactan protein epitopes in regenerating tissues of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (259), pp. 157–169. doi: 10.37317/biul-2011-0065.

Authors

Magdalena Tomaszewska-Sowa 
Magdalena.Tomaszewska-Sowa@pbs.edu.pl
Katedra Fizjologii i Podstaw Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Technologiczno — Przyrodniczy, Bydgoszcz Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 97
PDF downloads: 35


License

Copyright (c) 2011 Magdalena Tomaszewska-Sowa

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.