Laboratory reduction of submitted samples - comparison of the efficiency of three mechanical and three hand methods of reduction

Krzysztof Niemyski


Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin - Radzików, Zakład Metodyki Kontroli Materiału Siewnego (Poland)

Abstract

The author presents the numerical results of submitted sample reduction carried by means of three mechanical methods: the small size Boerner divider, the 12 and 8 channel soil dividers, and three hand methods: the rounded spoon, the spatula, and the ISTA 1976 spoon method.
Were carried out repeated reductions of synthetic samples of four blends, which had as main components the seeds of the following species: blend A - Phleum pratense, blends B and C - Trifolium pratense, blend D - Lolium perenne. The indicator seeds added in amounts representing three levels of impurities consisted of seeds: in blend A Lolium perenne, blend B - Phleum pratense, blend c - Rumex acetosa, blend D - Phleum pratense.
Comparatively the best efficiency of reduction was attained when the 12 channel soil divider was used. Second came the 8 channel model and the ISTA 1976 spoon method, third - the Boerner divider. The rounded spoon and the spatula methods were totally inadcquate.
The statistical analisis using the Chi-square computations and the caluntion of differences of individual expected and obtained results compared with the tolerances given in the ISTA Handbook of Miles, showed that the laboratory reduction by all methods is still subject to an exessive variation. The reduction of the blends A and D, representing mixtures of components differing maximally as to the shape and size lead to a too great dispersion of individual results evcn when the reduction was done bv means of the 12 channel soil divider.
The results of the investigations show that laboratory reduction methods need still to be improved, chiefly when the samples to be divided have components of different size and other characteristices. For comparatively homogenous mixtures, containing components relatively equal in size and shape the reduction by means of the 12 or 8 channel dividers, or of the ISTA spoon method is quite satisfactory.


Keywords:

seed science

Boeke S. E., Stuurman A. 1964. Het klaarmaken von werkmonsters voor het zuiverheitsonderzoek. Meded. v. h. R. P. v. Z. 56-69.
Google Scholar

Carter A. S.: 1960. Report of the sampling and bulking committee. Proc. ISTA 25: 467-475.
Google Scholar

Hall P. J., Roehrkasse G. P., Martinez J. 1972. Comparison of three types of seed dividers for subsampling chaffy seeds, Proc. AOSA 62: 76-85.
Google Scholar

Hardin E. E., Copeland L. O., Knudson L. A. 1965. A comparison of the relative effectiveness of the Boerner divider and several techniques of using the Gamet precision divider. Proc. AOSA 5'5: 146-147.
Google Scholar

Internationale Vorschriften fiir die Prilfung von Saatgut 1966, 1967, Proc. ISTA 31: 1-300.
Google Scholar

Isely D. 1959. Laboratory mcthod fur mixiug and dividing grasssccd mixtures, Proc. AOSA 49: 56-58.
Google Scholar

Johnston M. E., Tattcrsficld .J. G. 1971. Investigations into methods for obtaining working samples for purity analysis, Preprint ISTA 58, Ista XVI Congres, Washington.
Google Scholar

Miles S. 1963. Handbook of tolcn.111ccs and of measures of precision for seed tcsting. Proc. ISTA 2: 525-685.
Google Scholar

Niemyski K. 1975. Badania nad nwtodą laboratoryjnej redukcji próbek średnich na modelu mieszanek traw i motylkowatych. Hod. Rośl. Aklim. i Nasion 2: 134~187.
Google Scholar

Shenberger C. 1962. Large Boerner divider for sampling grass sced mixturcs, Proc. AOSA 52: 77-80.
Google Scholar


Published
1980-03-30

Cited by

Niemyski, K. (1980) “Laboratory reduction of submitted samples - comparison of the efficiency of three mechanical and three hand methods of reduction”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (138), pp. 3–13. doi: 10.37317/biul-1980-0001.

Authors

Krzysztof Niemyski 

Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin - Radzików, Zakład Metodyki Kontroli Materiału Siewnego Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 9
PDF downloads: 2


License

Copyright (c) 1980 Krzysztof Niemyski

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.