Comparison of five measures of genetic diversity of Polish wheats estimated on the basis of microsatellite markers
Jan Bocianowski
jan.bocianowski@up.poznan.plKatedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu (Poland)
Łukasz Stępień
Instytut Genetyki Roślin, Polskiej Akademii Nauk w Poznaniu (Poland)
Abstract
The aim of this study was to represent genetic distance among Polish wheat cultivars. The paper presents five methods of estimation of genetic distance based on coefficients proposed by Jaccard, Kulczynski, Sokal and Michener, Nei, Rogers. Material for the study involved 53 Polish wheat cultivars. The genetic distance of cultivars was estimated on the basis of 164 microsatellite alleles. The largest values of genetic diversity were obtained for the Jaccard’s distance. Significant positive correlation coefficients were obtained for the Jaccard’s, Kulczynski’s, Sokal and Michener’s and Nei’s distances. The results obtained for the Rogers’ distance were different from other compared distances.
Keywords:
genetic distance, microsatellite markers, wheatReferences
Burkhamer R. L., Lanning S. P., Martens R. J., Martin J. M., Talbert L. E. 1998. Predicting progeny variance from parental divergence in hard red spring wheat. Crop Sci. 38: 243 — 248.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800010041x
Google Scholar
Dillmann C., Bar-Hen A., Guérin D., Charcosset A., Murigneux A. 1997. Comparison of RFLP and morphological distance between maize Zea mays L. inbred lines. Consequences for germplasm protection purposes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 92 — 102.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050536
Google Scholar
Heckenberger M., Bohnb M., Klein D., Melchinger A. E. 2005. Identification of essentially derived varieties obtained from biparental crosses of homozygous lines. II. Morphological distances and heterosis in comparison with simple sequence repeat and amplified fragment length polymorphism data in maize. Crop Sci. 45: 1132 — 1140.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.0111
Google Scholar
Huang X. Q., Boerner A., Roeder M. S., Ganal M. W. 2002. Assessing genetic diversity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm using microsatellite markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105: 699 — 707.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-002-0959-4
Google Scholar
Jaccard P. 1908. Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bull. Soc. Vaud. Sci. Nat. 44: 223 — 270.
Google Scholar
Kim H. S., Ward R. W. 2000. Patterns of RFLP-based genetic diversity in germplasm pools of common wheat with different geographical or breeding program origins. Euphytica 115: 197 — 208.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004022601879
Google Scholar
Kuczyńska A., Milczarski P., Surma M., Masojć P., Adamski T. 2001. Genetic diversity among cultivars of spring barley revealed by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD). J. Appl. Genet. 42(1): 43 — 48.
Google Scholar
Kulczynski S. 1927. Die Pflanzenassoziationen der Pieninen. Bull. Intern. Acad. Pol. Sci. Lett. Cl. Sci. Math. Nat., B (Sci. Nat.) 1927 (Suppl. 2): 57 — 203.
Google Scholar
Mądry W., Śmiałowski T., Ukalski K. 2005. Przewidywanie średnich cechy w populacjach potomstwa na podstawie parametrów biometryczno-genetycznych rodziców: modele i ich zastosowanie dla żyta ozimego. Biul. IHAR 235: 251 — 268.
Google Scholar
Myśków B., Masojć P., Banek-Tabor A., Szolkowski A. 2001. Genetic diversity of inbred rye lines evaluated by RAPD analysis. J. Appl. Genet. 42 (1): 1 — 14.
Google Scholar
Nei M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106: 283 — 292.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/282771
Google Scholar
Patzak J. 2001. Comparison of RAPD, STS, ISSR, and AFLP molecular methods used for assessment of genetic diversity in hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Euphytica 121: 9 — 18.
Google Scholar
Pestsova E., Korzun V., Goncharov N. P., Hammer K., Ganal M. W., Roeder M. S. 2000. Microsatellite analysis of Aegilops tauschii germplasm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101: 100 — 106.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051456
Google Scholar
Plaschke J., Ganal M. W., Roeder M. S. 1995. Detection of genetic diversity in closely related bread wheat using microsatellite markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91: 1001 — 1007.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223912
Google Scholar
Powell W., Morgante W. M., Andre C., Hanafrey M., Vogel J., Tingey S., Rafalski A. 1996. Comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Mol. Breed. 2: 225 — 228.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00564200
Google Scholar
Roeder M. S., Wendehake K., Korzun V., Bredemeijer G., Laborie D., Bertrand L., Isaac P., Rendell S., Jackson J., Cooke R. J., Vosmann B., Ganal M. W. 2002. Construction and analysis of a microsatellite-based database of European wheat cultivars. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106: 67 — 73.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-002-1061-7
Google Scholar
Rogers J. S. 1972. Measures of genetic similarity and genetic distance. Studies in Genetics, University of Texas Publication 7213: 145 — 153.
Google Scholar
Sokal R. R., Michener C. D. 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 38: 1409 — 1438.
Google Scholar
Stępień Ł., Golka L., Chełkowski J. 2003. Leaf rust resistance genes of wheat: identification in cultivars and resistance sources. J. Appl. Genet. 44 (2): 139 — 149.
Google Scholar
Authors
Jan Bocianowskijan.bocianowski@up.poznan.pl
Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu Poland
Authors
Łukasz StępieńInstytut Genetyki Roślin, Polskiej Akademii Nauk w Poznaniu Poland
Statistics
Abstract views: 11PDF downloads: 2
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jan Bocianowski, Łukasz Stępień
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:
- Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
- Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
- Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
- Including the article in a collective work.
- Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
- Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
- Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.
Authors by sending a request for publication:
- They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
- They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
- They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
- They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
- They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Wojciech Rybiński, Michał Starzycki, Elżbieta Starzycka-Korbas, Jan Bocianowski, Genus Lathyrus — estimation and characterization using the chosen species and collected accessions , Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: No. 283 (2018): Special issue
- Ewa Bakinowska, Jan Bocianowski, Anna Budka, Wiesław Pilarczyk, Bogna Zawieja, Katarzyna Ambroży, Estimation of error variance in unreplicated plant breeding trials with replicated standard treatments , Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: No. 251 (2009): Regular issue
