Oat response to boron fertilization

Stanisław Wróbel

iung@iung.pulawy.pl
Instytut Uprawy Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa — Państwowy Instytut Badawczy w Puławach, Zakład Technik Uprawy Roli i Nawożenia w Jelczu-Laskowicach (Poland)

Abstract

Oat response to boron fertilization was evaluated in three one-year exact field experiments. The results were compared with those obtained in large-area trials. Yield forming influence of boron was found in the years characterized by water deficit in spring time. The boron content of oats grown on boron deficient soil exceeded the optimum proposed by Bergmann (1986). Fertilization with boron significantly increased oat grain yield and resulted in further increase in boron content of the biomass. The results indicate the need to verify the criteria applied for soil and plants supply with this microelement. They also show that better effects in improving oat grain supply with boron were obtained with soil than with foliar application of this fertilizer. Based on the close correspondence between the results obtained in exact experiments and in large-area trials, direct recommendations as to how to fertilize oat with boron in agricultural practice, can be made.


Keywords:

boron, boron fertilization, chemical tests, exact experiments, large-area trials, oat, oat yield

Bergmann W. 1986. Farbatlas Ernährungsstörungen bei Kulturpflanzen Visuelle und analytische Diagnose. VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena: 1 — 112.
Google Scholar

Biała księga bezpieczeństwa żywności (White paper on food safety). 2000. W: „Żywność Żywienie Prawo a Zdrowie”. Rok IX. Nr 1. Wyd. IŻiŻ, Warszawa: 5 — 74.
Google Scholar

Filipiak K., Wilkos S. 1995. Obliczenia statystyczne. Opis systemu AWAR. IUNG Puławy, R (324): 1 — 52.
Google Scholar

Filipiak K., Wilkos S. 1998. Wybrane metody analizy wielozmiennej i ich zastosowanie w badaniach przestrzennych. IUNG Puławy R (349): 1 — 58.
Google Scholar

Fotyma M., Mercik S. 1995. Chemia rolna. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: 1 — 356.
Google Scholar

Furlani A., Carvalho C., Freitag J., Verdial M. 2003. Wheat cultivar tolerance to boron deficiency and toxicity in nutrient solution. Scientia Agricola 60: 359 — 370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162003000200022
Google Scholar

Gembarzewski H. 2000. Stan i tendencje zmian zawartości mikroelementów w glebach i roślinach z pól produkcyjnych w Polsce. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk. Rol. 471 (1): 171 — 177.
Google Scholar

Metody badań laboratoryjnych w stacjach chemiczno-rolniczych. 1980. Cz. I. Badanie gleb. IUNG Puławy: 1 — 76.
Google Scholar

Metody badań laboratoryjnych w stacjach chemiczno-rolniczych. 1980. Cz. II. Badanie materiału roślinnego., IUNG Puławy: 1 — 126.
Google Scholar

Metody oznaczania ruchomych form mikroelementów w glebie do rutynowych oznaczeń w stacjach chemiczno-rolniczych (wspólna ekstrakcja 1 M HCl). 1986. IUNG Wrocław. (niepublikowane): 1 — 11.
Google Scholar

Newnham R. E. 2002. How boron is being used in medical practice. In: Boron in plant and animal nutrition. Goldbach H. E. (ed), Kluwer Acad. Pub. New York: 59 — 62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0607-2_6
Google Scholar

Nielsen F. H. 2002. The Nutritional importance of boron throughout the life cycle of higher animals and human. In: Boron in plant and animal nutrition. Goldbach H. (ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York: 37 — 50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0607-2_4
Google Scholar

Sacała E., Demczuk A., Grzyś E., Parylak D. 2004. Wpływ boru na aktywność reduktazy azotanowej oraz wzrost siewek pszenżyta. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk. Rol. 502 (1): 333 — 339.
Google Scholar

Simojoki P. 1991. Boron deficiency in barley. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 30: 389 — 405.
Google Scholar

Stangoulis J., Reid R. 2002. Boron toxicity in plants and animals. In: Boron in plant and animal nutrition. Goldbach H. (ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York: 227 — 240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0607-2_21
Google Scholar

Szukalski H. 1989. Mikroelementy w produkcji roślinnej. PWRiL, Warszawa: 1 — 320.
Google Scholar

Wróbel S. 2000 a. Poziom plonowania krajowych upraw produkcyjnych owsa a zawartość mikroelementów w glebie i roślinach. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 471: 609 — 617.
Google Scholar

Wróbel S. 2000 b. Wpływ wieloletniego produkcyjnego użytkowania pól uprawnych na zaopatrzenie gleb i pszenicy jarej w mikroelementy. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. nr 471: 619 — 626.
Google Scholar

Wróbel S. 2004 a. Reakcja pszenżyta ozimego na nawożenie borem w zależności od sposobu stosowania i dawki. Pamiętnik Puławski 138: 153 — 165.
Google Scholar

Wróbel S. 2004 b. Przydatność testu chemicznego w diagnozowaniu potrzeb nawożenia zbóż jarych borem. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. Nr 502: 443 — 450.
Google Scholar

Wróbel S., Hryńczuk B. 2004. Wpływ nawożenia borem na plonowanie i skład chemiczny pszenicy jarej. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. Nr 502: 451 — 457.
Google Scholar

Zalecenia Nawozowe. 1985. Praca zbiorowa. Część I. Liczby graniczne do wyceny zawartości w glebach makro- i mikroelementów. Wyd. IUNG Puławy, Seria P (26): 1 — 34.
Google Scholar


Published
2006-03-31

Cited by

Wróbel, S. (2006) “Oat response to boron fertilization”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (239), pp. 155–163. doi: 10.37317/biul-2006-0085.

Authors

Stanisław Wróbel 
iung@iung.pulawy.pl
Instytut Uprawy Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa — Państwowy Instytut Badawczy w Puławach, Zakład Technik Uprawy Roli i Nawożenia w Jelczu-Laskowicach Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 68
PDF downloads: 31


License

Copyright (c) 2006 Stanisław Wróbel

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.