Evaluation of tobacco varieties cultivated in the Podkarpackie province

Teresa Miś

tmis@ur.edu.pl
Zakład Polityki Gospodarczej i Agrobiznesu, Uniwersytet Rzeszowski w Rzeszowie (Poland)

Abstract

The aim of the studies was to compare the effects of different plant spacing on tobacco yield and market value as well as important qualitative features of four varieties representing type Virginia: Wiślica, Wisana, Wika and Wiecha. The field experiments designed as the randomized blocks were carried out in the years 1997-1998. The qualitative analysis of tobacco leaves included assessment of composition of soluble carbohydrates and true proteins, weight of 1 dm2 of dried leaves and amount of the main vein tissue (%) within the foliage. Plant spacing was found to influence considerably both yield and leaf quality of Virginia tobacco. The yield and market value of plants grown at the spacing 70 x 40 cm were higher than those of plants grown at 90 x 40 cm. However, the leaves of higher quality, characterized by a high content of carbohydrates and a relatively low content of proteins, were produced by the plants grown at 90 x 40 cm. Based on the results concerning the yield and quality of raw material, two tobacco varieties: Wiślica and Wika can be recommended for cultivation.


Keywords:

quality of leaves, varieties, tobacco, yield of leaves, yield value

Arrestier R., Vidal B., Albo J. P., Chouteau J. 1984. Influence de la compacite et de diverses modalites d’ecimage et d’inhibition sur les principales caracteristiques d’un tabac de type Virginie. Ann. Tabac, sect. 2, 18, Bergerac S.E.I.T.A: 177 — 195.
Google Scholar

Cifudow M., Pamukow I. 1982. Gastota na rozsazdane i krszenena sort Szumen 314. Błg. Tjutjun, 4: 14 — 17.
Google Scholar

Gajos Z., Jarzyna W., Szewczyk E., Jabłońska S. 1996. Sprawozdanie z wykonania tematu: Ocena nowych odmian tytoniu typu Virginia, przeprowadzona w doświadczeniach rejonowych w 1995. Centralne Laboratorium Przemysłu Tytoniowego w Krakowie, Pracownia Hodowli i Nasiennictwa: 1 — 16.
Google Scholar

Jarzyna W. 1997. Wyniki doświadczeń prowadzonych nad nowymi odmianami tytoniu Virginia w 1996 roku. Przeg. Tyt. 6: 4 — 7.
Google Scholar

Kittrell B. U., Collins W. K., Fike W. T., Seltmann H., Weeks W. W. 1975. Effects of leaf numbers per acre and nitrogen rates on the agronomic, economic and chemical characteristics of bright tobacco. Tobacco Science, t. 19: 127 — 130.
Google Scholar

Kościk B. 1993. Reakcja tytoniu papierosowego jasnego na sposób stosowania zróżnicowanych dawek nawozów mineralnych. Rozprawa hab., AR Lublin: 3 — 50.
Google Scholar

Kościk B., Kowalczyk Juśko A. 1997. Efektywność nowych technologii uprawy tytoniu. Bibliotheca Fragm. Agron. t. 3: 233 — 240.
Google Scholar

Rocznik Statystyczny 2001. GUS Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Sławiński A., Tokarz S. 1991. Zalecenia dla plantatorów uprawiających tytoń odmiany Virginia — Wiślica.
Google Scholar

Tso T. C. 1990. Production, physiology and biochemistry of tobacco plant. Institute of International Development and Education in Agricultural and Life Sciences, Beltsville, Maryland, USA. Spacing: 83 — 90.
Google Scholar

Wiśniewski J. 1981. Plony i jakość tytoniu papierosowego ciemnego uprawianego w szerokiej rozstawie rzędów w układzie tradycyjnym i pasowym. Ann. UMCS E, XXXV/XXXVI, 13: 135 — 147.
Google Scholar

Wiśniowska-Kielian B. 1994. The influence of soil acidification on chemical composition of tobacco leaves. Zesz. Post. Nauk Rol. z. 413: 321 — 326.
Google Scholar


Published
2003-09-30

Cited by

Miś, T. (2003) “Evaluation of tobacco varieties cultivated in the Podkarpackie province”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (228), pp. 363–371. doi: 10.37317/biul-2003-0120.

Authors

Teresa Miś 
tmis@ur.edu.pl
Zakład Polityki Gospodarczej i Agrobiznesu, Uniwersytet Rzeszowski w Rzeszowie Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 46
PDF downloads: 26


License

Copyright (c) 2003 Teresa Miś

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.