Occurrence of the root rot beet pathogens in sugar beet cultivation sites

Paweł Skonieczek

p.skonieczek@ihar.edu.pl
Zakład Technologii Produkcji Roślin Okopowych, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — PIB, Oddział w Bydgoszczy (Poland)

Mirosław Nowakowski


Zakład Technologii Produkcji Roślin Okopowych, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — PIB, Oddział w Bydgoszczy (Poland)

Abstract

The IHAR — PIB in Bydgoszcz received in 2010 eleven samples of infected sugar beet roots and soil. The samples were taken from areas of the following provinces: Kujawy-Pomerania, Pomerania and Warmia-Masuria. The main purpose of the tests was to examine the occurrence of Rhizoctonia solani. The content of macronutrients, salinity and pH were evaluated in the samples of the soil. First, the soil was placed on trays and then sugar beet seeds were sown. The occurrence of various fungi genera, including Fusarium, Aphanomyces, Pythium, Rhizoctonia, Verticillium, Cladosporium and Alternaria was noted. R. solani was detected in the soil obtained from Minikowo and Sypniewo areas (Kujawy-Pomerania) and also from Wandowo area (Pomerania). After growth in the mentioned soils the following R. solani infection rates on the sugar beet seedlings were found: 15.3% (on average for Janosik and Jenna sugar beet cultivars), 7.9% (Janosik) and 15.7% (Janosik). Frequent observations and examinations of the microscopic specimen of infected sugar beet tissue showed simultaneous occurrence of many fungi, among which fungi such as genera Aphanomyces, Fusarium, Pythium, Verticillum and Rhizoctonia dominated. The studies of received roots and soils samples confirmed that in three cases R. solani was present in the soil as well as on the plant.


Keywords:

Aphanomyces, Cladosporium Fusarium, Pythium, Rhizoctonia solani, Verticillium, infection, occurence of Alternaria, sugar beet

Borodynko N., Moliszewska E., Wiśniewski W. 2011. Choroby buraka cukrowego. Biuletyn Agrotechniczny KWS nr 1/2011 (10): 1 — 22.
Google Scholar

Dircs Ch., Behn A., Varrelmann M. 2011. Optimization of sugar beet Rhizoctonia solani resistance test in field trials by irrigation and fleece cover. Abstracts presented at the 2011 General Meeting of the ASSBT. Journal of Sugar Beet Research.Vol. 48 Nos. 1–2: 82 — 83.
Google Scholar

Domsch K. H., Gams W., Anderson T. H. 1980. Compendium of soil fungi. Academic Press, London: 859 pp.
Google Scholar

Führer Ithurrart M. E., Büttner G., Petersen J. 2004. Rhizoctonia root rot in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. altissima) — Epidemiological aspects in relation to maize (Zea mays) as a host plant. J. Plant Dis. Prot., 111: 302 — 312.
Google Scholar

Gutmański I., Nowakowski M., Mikita J. 2000. Possibilities of balanced sugar beet nutrition in Poland. Proc. of Reg. Workshop of Beta Research Institute, WPI, IPI: Balanced plant nutrition in sugar beet cropping systems for high yield and quality. Budapest, 1–2.09.1999: 120 — 130.
Google Scholar

Harveson R. M., Hein G. L., Smith J. A., Wilson, R. G., Yonts C. D. 2002. An integrated approach to cultivar evaluation and selection for improving sugar beet profitability: a successful case study for the Central High Plains. Plant Disease 86 (3): 192 — 204.
Google Scholar

Kowalik M. 1983. Patogeniczność wybranych szczepów grzybów zgorzelowych buraka cukrowego. Zesz. Nauk. AR Krak. 179, Ogrodn. 12: 157 — 168.
Google Scholar

MacDonald J. D., Leach J. D. 1976. The association of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. betae with nonprocessed and processed sugarbeet seed. Phytopathology 66: 868 — 872.
Google Scholar

Martyn, R. D., Rush, C. M., Biles, C. L., Baker, E. H. 1989. Etiology of a root rot disease of sugar beet in Texas. Plant Disease 73: 879 — 884.
Google Scholar

Moliszewska E. B. 1999. Wpływ wybranych herbicydów na zdrowotność siewek buraka cukrowego, praca doktorska, Uniwersytet Opolski — Akademia Rolnicza w Krakowie: 129 ss.
Google Scholar

Moliszewska E. B. 2000. The influence of some herbicides on species variation of fungi associated with rotted tissue of sugar beet seedlings. Phytopathologia Polonica 20: 85 — 95.
Google Scholar

Moliszewska E. B. 2009. Etiologia wybranych chorób korzeni buraka cukrowego, Uniwersytet Opolski, Studia i monografie nr 412, Opole 2009: 131 ss.
Google Scholar

Moliszewska E. B., Burgieł Z. J. 2002. Badania wybranych szczepów grzyba Rhizoctonia solani Kühn wyizolowanych z zamierających siewek buraka cukrowego. Z. Nauk. AR w Krakowie 82: 101 — 104.
Google Scholar

Moliszewska E. B., Schneider J. H. M. 2002. Studies on pathogenic properties of Rhizoctonia solani against sugar beet seedlings, Plant Protection Science 38 (Special Issue 2): 322 — 324.
Google Scholar

Nitschke E. Varrelmann M. 2008. Fusarium vs. sugar beet — characterization of pathogenicity and colonization patterns of different Fusarium species. In: Abstract of Papers of 71st IIRB Congress, Brussels: 87.
Google Scholar

Orlikowski L. 1989. Mechanizm oporności gleb na formy specjalne Fusarium oxysporum. Post. Nauk Roln. 4: 41–56.
Google Scholar

Pisarek I., Moliszewska E. B. 1999. Badanie wpływu właściwości fizyko-chemicznych gleb na populację Rhizoctonia solani Kühn w obecności wybranych herbicydów. Zesz. Probl. Postępu Nauk Rolniczych 467: 579 — 585.
Google Scholar

Piszczek J. 2004. Occurrence of root rot of sugar beet cultivars. Journal of Plant Protection Research 44 (4): 341 — 345.
Google Scholar

Skonieczek P., Nowakowski M. 2011. Rizoktonioza, choroba zagrażająca uprawie buraka cukrowego. Polski Cukier 4 (9) 2011: 24 — 25.
Google Scholar

Szymczak-Nowak J. 2005. Wrażliwość wybranych odmian buraka cukrowego na Rhizoctonia solani Kühn. Progress in Plant Protection / Postępy w Ochronie Roślin, Poznań, 45 (2): 1141 — 1144.
Google Scholar

Szymczak-Nowak J., Nowakowska H., Pańczyk T., Sitarski A., Wąsacz E., Skibowska B. 2001. Ocena wrażliwości materiałów hodowlanych buraka cukrowego na Cercospora beticola Sacc. i Rhizoctonia solani Kühn. Progress in Plant Protection / Postępy w Ochronie Roślin, Poznań, 41 (2): 779 — 782.
Google Scholar

Szymczak-Nowak J., Nowakowska H., Sitarski A., Wąsacz E. 2002. Patogeniczność izolatów grzyba Rhizoctonia solani Kühn dla kilku odmian buraka cukrowego. Progress in Plant Protection / Postępy w Ochronie Roślin, Poznań, 42 (2): 913 — 916.
Google Scholar

Williams G. E., Asher M. J. C. 1996. Selection of rhizobacteria for the control of Pythium ultimum and Aphanomyces cochlioides on sugar-beet seedlings. Crop Protection 15 (5): 479 — 486.
Google Scholar

Windels C. E., Lamey H. A. 1998. Identification and control of seedling diseases, root rot and Rhizomania on sugar beet. BU-7192-S. North Dakota State University: 1142 pp.
Google Scholar

Zellner M., Hügl A., Büttner P., Opitz K. 2002. Monitoren Ergebnisse zum Befall mit Rhizoctonia solani an Rüben, Mais und Unkräutern. — Mitt. Biol. BundAnst. Ld.- u. Forstw. H. 390: 346 — 347.
Google Scholar


Published
2013-03-31

Cited by

Skonieczek, P. and Nowakowski, M. (2013) “Occurrence of the root rot beet pathogens in sugar beet cultivation sites”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (267), pp. 145–152. doi: 10.37317/biul-2013-0059.

Authors

Paweł Skonieczek 
p.skonieczek@ihar.edu.pl
Zakład Technologii Produkcji Roślin Okopowych, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — PIB, Oddział w Bydgoszczy Poland

Authors

Mirosław Nowakowski 

Zakład Technologii Produkcji Roślin Okopowych, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — PIB, Oddział w Bydgoszczy Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 68
PDF downloads: 50


License

Copyright (c) 2013 Paweł Skonieczek, Mirosław Nowakowski

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.