Estimation of BC1 hybrids (Avena sativa L. × Avena maroccana Gdgr.) × Avena sativa L. regarding cytogenetic stability and some quantitative traits

Maria Chrząstek

bozena.denisow@up.lublin.pl
Katedra Biologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Lublin (Poland)

Katarzyna Kruk


Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Lublin (Poland)

Sylwia Okoń


Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Lublin (Poland)

Edyta Paczos-Grzęda


Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Lublin (Poland)

Emilia Wójtowicz


Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Lublin (Poland)

Abstract

The hybrids BC1 (Avena sativa L. × Avena maroccana Gdgr.) × Avena sativa L and their parental forms were subject of research. Cytogenetic stability of the tested plants was determined after studying some meiosis stages and pollen viability. Conjugation and segregation of chromosomes were more disturbed in hybrids than in the parental forms. The highest frequency of micronuclei (0.134/PMC) was noted in tetrads of the Góral × Clav 8330 × Góral hybrid. Hybrid combinations showed high pollen viability, ranging from 96.90 to 99.68%. The tested hybrids were much differentiated regarding majority of quantitative traits. The longest main panicle was observed in the (Dragon × CN 39621) × Dragon hybrid while in the combination (Chwat × CN43136) × Chwat (82.00) panicle consisted of the highest number of spikelet. Mean number of kernels per panicle in the hybrids ranged from 45.55 to 201.43. Fertility of spikelet among the hybrids was not much differentiated and similar to the maternal cultivars. Significant differences among the hybrids were noticed for 1000 kernels weight and protein content. Weight of thousand kernels in the hybrid combinations was about 5.8 g lower than in the maternal forms but kernels contained more protein than the oat cultivars. The hybrid Chwat × CN43136 × Chwat was positively distinguishable, regarding most of the analyzed quantitative traits.

 

Keywords:

Avena sativa L., Avena maroccana Gdgr., BC1, interspecific hybrids, meiosis, quantitative traits, pollen viability

Chae Y., Forsberg R. A. 1975. Inheritance of node, branch, and spikelet number in oat panicles. Diallel analysis of F1 and F2. Crop Sci. 15: 457 — 460.
Google Scholar

Chrząstek M., Paczos-Grzęda E. 2003. Analiza molekularna i cytologiczna oraz ocena niektórych cech ilościowych mieszańców międzygatunkowych Avena sativa L. × A. fatua L. Biul. IHAR 230: 387 — 397.
Google Scholar

Chrząstek M., Paczos-Grzęda E., Miazga D. 2004. Charakterystyka cytologiczna i molekularna niektórych gatunków z rodzaju Avena. Rozprawy i monografie IGR PAN Genetyka w ulepszaniu roślin użytkowych, Poznań: 67 — 74.
Google Scholar

Chrząstek M., Paczos- Grzęda E., Kruk K. 2006. Ocena zróżnicowania genetycznego polskich odmian owsa (Avena sativa L.). Acta Agrophysica 8: 319 — 326.
Google Scholar

Chrząstek M., Paczos-Grzęda E., Kruk K. 2007. Efektywność krzyżowań wstecznych mieszańców międzygatunkowych owsa. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych 517: 819 — 826
Google Scholar

Elliot A. L., Thro A. M., Frey K. J. 1985. Inheritance of groat-oil content and several other traits in inter- and intra-specific oat mating. Iowa State J. Research 60: 13 — 24.
Google Scholar

Frey K.J. 1986. Genetic resources and their use in oat breeding. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Oat Conf. 1985, Aberystwyth, U.K.: 9 — 15.
Google Scholar

Gąsiorowski H., Cierniewska A. 1995. Morfologia i anatomia. W: Owies — chemia i technologia, PWRiL, Poznań: 36 — 46.
Google Scholar

Gornall R. J. 1977. Notes on the size and exine ornamentation of Avena pollen grains. Can. J. Bot. 55: 2622 – 2629.
Google Scholar

Guang-Bing D., Zhi-Fen P., Xu-Guang Z., Mao-Qun Y. 2005. Morphologic and cytogenetic characterization of F1 from interspecies cross in oat. Acta Agron. Sin. 31: 1186 — 1191.
Google Scholar

Katsiotis A., Forsberg R. A. 1995 a. Production and cytogenetics of tetraploid-octoploid Avena hybrids. Plant Breed. 114: 137 — 143.
Google Scholar

Katsiotis A., Forsberg R. A. 1995 b. Pollen grain size in four ploidy levels of genus Avena. Euphytica 83: 103 — 108.
Google Scholar

Ladizinsky G. 1971. Chromosome rearrangements in the hexaploid oats. Heredity 25: 457 — 461.
Google Scholar

Leggett J. M. 1996. Using and conserving Avena genetic resources. Proc. of. 5th Int. Oat Conf., Canada, 128 — 132.
Google Scholar

Loskutov I. G. 2000. Some quality groat characters in oat wild species. Proc. 6th Int. Oat Confer., Lincoln Univ., N.Z.: 248 — 253.
Google Scholar

Loskutov I. G. 2001. Interspecific crosses in the genus Avena L. Rus. J. Genet. 37: 467 — 475.
Google Scholar

McMullen M. S., Phillips R. L., Stuthman D. D. 1982. Meiotic irregularities in Avena sativa L./A. sterilis L. hybrids and breeding implications. Crop Sci. 22: 890 — 897.
Google Scholar

Paczos-Grzęda E. 2003. Pedigree, RAPD and simplified AFLP-based assessment of genetic relationships among Avena sativa L. cultivars. Euphytica 138: 13 — 22.
Google Scholar

Paczos-Grzęda E. 2003 b. Badania cytogenetyczne i molekularne mieszańców międzygatunkowych heksaploidalnego owsa Avena sativa L. × Avena sterilis L. oraz form wyjściowych. Biul. IHAR 229: 33 — 41.
Google Scholar

Palagyi A. 1983. Tertiary seed proportions in the grain yield of several oat varieties. Cereal Res. Comm. 11: 269 — 274.
Google Scholar

Petr F. C., Frey K. J. 1966. Genotypic correlations, dominance and heritability of quantitative characters in oats. Crop Sci. 6: 259 — 262.
Google Scholar

Pomeranz Y., Youngs V. L., Robbins G. S. 1973. Protein content and amino acid composition of oat species and tissues. Cereal Chem. 50: 702 — 707.
Google Scholar

Rajhathy T., Thomas H. 1974. Cytogenetic of oats (Avena L.). Misc. Publ. Genet. Soc., No. 2. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: 5 — 90.
Google Scholar

Stalker H. T. 1980. Utilization of wild species for crop improvement. Advances in Agronomy 33: 111 — 147.
Google Scholar

Takeda K., Frey K. J. 1980. Tertiary seed set in oat cultivars. Crop Sci. 20: 771 — 774.
Google Scholar

Thomas H., Al-Ansari N. 1980. Genotypic control of chromosome pairing in amphiploids involving the cultivated oat Avena sativa L. Euphytica 37: 37 — 45.
Google Scholar


Published
2009-09-30

Cited by

Chrząstek, M. (2009) “Estimation of BC1 hybrids (Avena sativa L. × Avena maroccana Gdgr.) × Avena sativa L. regarding cytogenetic stability and some quantitative traits”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (253), pp. 193–203. doi: 10.37317/biul-2009-0035.

Authors

Maria Chrząstek 
bozena.denisow@up.lublin.pl
Katedra Biologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Lublin Poland

Authors

Katarzyna Kruk 

Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Lublin Poland

Authors

Sylwia Okoń 

Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Lublin Poland

Authors

Edyta Paczos-Grzęda 

Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Lublin Poland

Authors

Emilia Wójtowicz 

Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Lublin Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 30
PDF downloads: 32


License

Copyright (c) 2009 Maria Chrząstek, Katarzyna Kruk, Sylwia Okoń, Edyta Paczos-Grzęda, Emilia Wójtowicz

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.