Estimation of BC1 hybrids (Avena sativa L. × Avena maroccana Gdgr.) × Avena sativa L. regarding cytogenetic stability and some quantitative traits
Maria Chrząstek
bozena.denisow@up.lublin.plKatedra Biologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Lublin (Poland)
Katarzyna Kruk
Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Lublin (Poland)
Sylwia Okoń
Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Lublin (Poland)
Edyta Paczos-Grzęda
Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Lublin (Poland)
Emilia Wójtowicz
Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Lublin (Poland)
Abstract
The hybrids BC1 (Avena sativa L. × Avena maroccana Gdgr.) × Avena sativa L and their parental forms were subject of research. Cytogenetic stability of the tested plants was determined after studying some meiosis stages and pollen viability. Conjugation and segregation of chromosomes were more disturbed in hybrids than in the parental forms. The highest frequency of micronuclei (0.134/PMC) was noted in tetrads of the Góral × Clav 8330 × Góral hybrid. Hybrid combinations showed high pollen viability, ranging from 96.90 to 99.68%. The tested hybrids were much differentiated regarding majority of quantitative traits. The longest main panicle was observed in the (Dragon × CN 39621) × Dragon hybrid while in the combination (Chwat × CN43136) × Chwat (82.00) panicle consisted of the highest number of spikelet. Mean number of kernels per panicle in the hybrids ranged from 45.55 to 201.43. Fertility of spikelet among the hybrids was not much differentiated and similar to the maternal cultivars. Significant differences among the hybrids were noticed for 1000 kernels weight and protein content. Weight of thousand kernels in the hybrid combinations was about 5.8 g lower than in the maternal forms but kernels contained more protein than the oat cultivars. The hybrid Chwat × CN43136 × Chwat was positively distinguishable, regarding most of the analyzed quantitative traits.
Keywords:
Avena sativa L., Avena maroccana Gdgr., BC1, interspecific hybrids, meiosis, quantitative traits, pollen viabilityReferences
Chae Y., Forsberg R. A. 1975. Inheritance of node, branch, and spikelet number in oat panicles. Diallel analysis of F1 and F2. Crop Sci. 15: 457 — 460.
Google Scholar
Chrząstek M., Paczos-Grzęda E. 2003. Analiza molekularna i cytologiczna oraz ocena niektórych cech ilościowych mieszańców międzygatunkowych Avena sativa L. × A. fatua L. Biul. IHAR 230: 387 — 397.
Google Scholar
Chrząstek M., Paczos-Grzęda E., Miazga D. 2004. Charakterystyka cytologiczna i molekularna niektórych gatunków z rodzaju Avena. Rozprawy i monografie IGR PAN Genetyka w ulepszaniu roślin użytkowych, Poznań: 67 — 74.
Google Scholar
Chrząstek M., Paczos- Grzęda E., Kruk K. 2006. Ocena zróżnicowania genetycznego polskich odmian owsa (Avena sativa L.). Acta Agrophysica 8: 319 — 326.
Google Scholar
Chrząstek M., Paczos-Grzęda E., Kruk K. 2007. Efektywność krzyżowań wstecznych mieszańców międzygatunkowych owsa. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych 517: 819 — 826
Google Scholar
Elliot A. L., Thro A. M., Frey K. J. 1985. Inheritance of groat-oil content and several other traits in inter- and intra-specific oat mating. Iowa State J. Research 60: 13 — 24.
Google Scholar
Frey K.J. 1986. Genetic resources and their use in oat breeding. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Oat Conf. 1985, Aberystwyth, U.K.: 9 — 15.
Google Scholar
Gąsiorowski H., Cierniewska A. 1995. Morfologia i anatomia. W: Owies — chemia i technologia, PWRiL, Poznań: 36 — 46.
Google Scholar
Gornall R. J. 1977. Notes on the size and exine ornamentation of Avena pollen grains. Can. J. Bot. 55: 2622 – 2629.
Google Scholar
Guang-Bing D., Zhi-Fen P., Xu-Guang Z., Mao-Qun Y. 2005. Morphologic and cytogenetic characterization of F1 from interspecies cross in oat. Acta Agron. Sin. 31: 1186 — 1191.
Google Scholar
Katsiotis A., Forsberg R. A. 1995 a. Production and cytogenetics of tetraploid-octoploid Avena hybrids. Plant Breed. 114: 137 — 143.
Google Scholar
Katsiotis A., Forsberg R. A. 1995 b. Pollen grain size in four ploidy levels of genus Avena. Euphytica 83: 103 — 108.
Google Scholar
Ladizinsky G. 1971. Chromosome rearrangements in the hexaploid oats. Heredity 25: 457 — 461.
Google Scholar
Leggett J. M. 1996. Using and conserving Avena genetic resources. Proc. of. 5th Int. Oat Conf., Canada, 128 — 132.
Google Scholar
Loskutov I. G. 2000. Some quality groat characters in oat wild species. Proc. 6th Int. Oat Confer., Lincoln Univ., N.Z.: 248 — 253.
Google Scholar
Loskutov I. G. 2001. Interspecific crosses in the genus Avena L. Rus. J. Genet. 37: 467 — 475.
Google Scholar
McMullen M. S., Phillips R. L., Stuthman D. D. 1982. Meiotic irregularities in Avena sativa L./A. sterilis L. hybrids and breeding implications. Crop Sci. 22: 890 — 897.
Google Scholar
Paczos-Grzęda E. 2003. Pedigree, RAPD and simplified AFLP-based assessment of genetic relationships among Avena sativa L. cultivars. Euphytica 138: 13 — 22.
Google Scholar
Paczos-Grzęda E. 2003 b. Badania cytogenetyczne i molekularne mieszańców międzygatunkowych heksaploidalnego owsa Avena sativa L. × Avena sterilis L. oraz form wyjściowych. Biul. IHAR 229: 33 — 41.
Google Scholar
Palagyi A. 1983. Tertiary seed proportions in the grain yield of several oat varieties. Cereal Res. Comm. 11: 269 — 274.
Google Scholar
Petr F. C., Frey K. J. 1966. Genotypic correlations, dominance and heritability of quantitative characters in oats. Crop Sci. 6: 259 — 262.
Google Scholar
Pomeranz Y., Youngs V. L., Robbins G. S. 1973. Protein content and amino acid composition of oat species and tissues. Cereal Chem. 50: 702 — 707.
Google Scholar
Rajhathy T., Thomas H. 1974. Cytogenetic of oats (Avena L.). Misc. Publ. Genet. Soc., No. 2. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: 5 — 90.
Google Scholar
Stalker H. T. 1980. Utilization of wild species for crop improvement. Advances in Agronomy 33: 111 — 147.
Google Scholar
Takeda K., Frey K. J. 1980. Tertiary seed set in oat cultivars. Crop Sci. 20: 771 — 774.
Google Scholar
Thomas H., Al-Ansari N. 1980. Genotypic control of chromosome pairing in amphiploids involving the cultivated oat Avena sativa L. Euphytica 37: 37 — 45.
Google Scholar
Authors
Maria Chrząstekbozena.denisow@up.lublin.pl
Katedra Biologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Lublin Poland
Authors
Katarzyna KrukInstytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Lublin Poland
Authors
Sylwia OkońInstytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Lublin Poland
Authors
Edyta Paczos-GrzędaInstytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Lublin Poland
Authors
Emilia WójtowiczInstytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Lublin Poland
Statistics
Abstract views: 30PDF downloads: 32
License
Copyright (c) 2009 Maria Chrząstek, Katarzyna Kruk, Sylwia Okoń, Edyta Paczos-Grzęda, Emilia Wójtowicz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:
- Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
- Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
- Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
- Including the article in a collective work.
- Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
- Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
- Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.
Authors by sending a request for publication:
- They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
- They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
- They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
- They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
- They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Agnieszka Grądzielewska, Edyta Paczos-Grzęda, Daniela Gruszecka, Application of RAPD and ISSR methods to genetic similarity estimation of Greek Dasypyrum villosum (L.) P. Candargy populations , Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: No. 253 (2009): Regular issue