Search for resistance to diseases among local populations of beet

Kamilla Kużdowicz

k.kuzdowicz@ihar.bydgoszcz.pl
Zakład Genetyki i Hodowli Roślin Korzeniowych, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin, Oddział w Bydgoszczy (Poland)

Abstract

The aim of this study was a search for genotypes resistant to Aphanomyces cochlioides Drechsler, Cercospora leaf spot (Cercospora beticola Saccardo), powdery mildew (Erysiphe betae), beet rust (Uromyces betae Lev.) and Beet Yellows Virus (virus BYV) among local forms of beet from the genus Beta collection. The investigation was carried out in the years 1997–2008 at the Bydgoszcz Research Division of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute and at the Experiment Station of Plant Breeding Strzelce Co. in Kończewice. The field experiments were conducted using the randomized split-block method with two or four replications. The susceptibility to diseases was investigated in field or laboratory conditions. Seven populations with reduced susceptibility to A. cochlioides (UKR 97/059, UKR 97/129, UKR 97/138, UKR PKA 98/68, UKR PKA 98/89b, UKR PKA 98/89c, UKR PKA 98/252 ), eight populations tolerant to C. beticola (UKR 99/107, UKR 98/337, SLO KAR 96/530, POL BIA 98/45, POL NAR 99/58, UKR 98/103/CKA, UKR 97/129/CKA, UKR KAR 96/009/CKA) and one with clearly reduced susceptibility to U. betae (SLO KAR 96 /512) were found in the investigation. Some of them may be used in research and breeding programs. No forms totally resistant beets to diseases were noticed.


Keywords:

beet diseases, genus Beta, local varieties, resistance

Asher M. J. C., Luterbacher M. C., Frese L. 2001. Wild Beta species as a source of resistance to sugar-beet pests and diseases. International Sugar Journal 103: 447 — 456.
Google Scholar

Dalke L. 1997. Kierunki hodowli i charakterystyka odmian buraka pastewnego. Biul. IHAR 202: 9 — 11.
Google Scholar

Dalke L., Kużdowicz K., Podyma W., Nowosielska D., Hauptvogel P. Boguslavskij R. L. 2000. Variation in beet resources collected in Ukraine and Slovak Carpathian mountains. Report of Working Group on Beta. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome: 70 — 71.
Google Scholar

Dalke L., Kużdowicz K., Szymczak-Nowak J., Sitarski A., Wąsacz E. 2001. Search for diseases resistance in beets collected in the Ukraine and the Slovak Carpathian Mountains. In: “Broad Variation and Precise Characterization — Limitation for the Future”. (W. Święcicki, Naganowska B., Wolko B.) EUCARPIA/Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznań: 172 — 173.
Google Scholar

Dalke L. 2004. Metody hodowli buraka cukrowego. Biul. IHAR 234: 15 — 20.
Google Scholar

Grzebelus D., Barański B., Reby E., Michalik B. 2004. Poszukiwanie źródeł odporności na Cercospora beticola Sacc. w zasobach genowych rodzaju Beta. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 497: 665 — 671.
Google Scholar

Gutmański I. (red.). 1991. Produkcja buraka cukrowego. PWRiL, Poznań: 477 — 492.
Google Scholar

Holtschulte B. 2000. Cercospora beticola — worldwide distribution and incidence. Cercospora beticola Sacc. Biology, Agronomic Influence and Control Measures in Sugar Beet. International Institute for Beet Research, Brussels 2: 5 — 16.
Google Scholar

Karpiński W. J. 1912. Uprawa buraków cukrowych. Warszawa, Wyd. Gebethner i Wolf.
Google Scholar

Koch G. 1997. Genetische Untersuchungen zur Cercospora beticola Resistenz in Zuckerrüben Vorträge für Phlanzenzüchtung 37: 54 — 64.
Google Scholar

Kużdowicz K., Wąsacz E. 2005. Wrażliwość zgromadzonych w kolekcji przedstawicieli rodzaju Beta na porażenie przez Cercospora beticola Sacc. Prog. Plant. Protect./Post. Ochr. Roślin 45(2): 838 — 841.
Google Scholar

Kużdowicz K. 2007 a. Kolekcja gatunków dzikich i form uprawnych rodzaju Beta gromadzenie, ocena i wykorzystanie w badaniach i hodowli. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 517: 63 — 72.
Google Scholar

Kużdowicz K. 2007 b. Zdrowotność materiałów kolekcyjnych rodzaju Beta. Prog. Plant Protect./ Post. Ochr. Roślin 47 (1): 67 — 71.
Google Scholar

Kużdowicz K. 2008. Podatność odmian buraka ćwikłowego na porażenie przez Cercospora beticola Sacc. i Uromyces betae Lev.. Prog. Plant Protect./ Post. Ochr. Roślin 48 (3): 1073 — 1076.
Google Scholar

Osińska B. 1984. Zgorzel siewek buraka. Cz. I. Objawy choroby i jej sprawcy. Ochrona Roślin nr 5: 9 — 11.
Google Scholar

Panella L., Frese L. 2000. Cercospora resistance in Beta species and the development of resistant sugar beet lines. Cercospora beticola Sacc. Biology, Agronomic Influence and Control Measures in Sugar Beet. International Institute for Beet Research, Brussels 2 :163 — 176.
Google Scholar

Scaracis G. N., Biancardi E. 2000. Breeding for Cercospora resistance in sugar beet Cercospora beticola Sacc. biology, agronomic influence and control measures in sugar beet. International Institute for Beet Research, Brussels 2: 177 — 196.
Google Scholar

Smith G. A., Gaskill J. O. 1970. Inheritance of resistance to Cercospora leaf spot in sugar beet.J. Am.Soc.Sugar Beet Technol. 16:172-180.
Google Scholar

Stähle-Csech K., Gisi K. 1991. Determination of sensivity to DMI fungicides of Cercospora beticola on sugar beet. Bull. OEPP/EPPO Bull. 21: 321 — 323.
Google Scholar

Szymczak-Nowak J. Banaszak H. 1994. Znaczenie zgorzeli siewek w integrowanej produkcji buraka cukrowego. Mat. 34 Sesji Nauk. Inst. Ochr. Roślin 1:170 — 174.
Google Scholar

Szymczak-Nowak J., Dalke L., Kużdowicz K. 2003. Ocena odporności na choroby w kolekcji buraków pochodzących z ekspedycji na Słowację i Ukrainę. Prog. Plant. Protect./Post. Ochr. Roślin 43: 970 — 972.
Google Scholar


Published
2009-09-30

Cited by

Kużdowicz, K. (2009) “Search for resistance to diseases among local populations of beet ”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (253), pp. 251–257. doi: 10.37317/biul-2009-0041.

Authors

Kamilla Kużdowicz 
k.kuzdowicz@ihar.bydgoszcz.pl
Zakład Genetyki i Hodowli Roślin Korzeniowych, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin, Oddział w Bydgoszczy Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 48
PDF downloads: 32


License

Copyright (c) 2009 Kamilla Kużdowicz

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.