Evaluation the effectiveness of herbicides in potato cultivation

Marek Gugała

marek.gugala@uph.edu.pl
Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Podlaska, Siedlce (Poland)

Krystyna Zarzecka


Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Podlaska, Siedlce (Poland)

Abstract

The research was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of selected herbicides and their mixtures in potato stands. A field experiment was conducted in the years 2002-2004 at the Experimental Farm in Zawady owned by the University of Podlasie, Siedlce. The experimental design was a split-plot design with three replications. The factors examined were as follows: factor I — two soil tillage methods (traditional and simplified), factor II — seven weed control methods (1. control treatment — mechanical weed control before and after potato emergence, 2. Plateen 41.5 WG 2.0 kg·ha-1, 3. Plateen 41.5 WG 2.0 kg·ha-1 + Fusilade Forte 150 EC 2.5 dm3·ha-1 (mixture), 4. Plateen 41.5 WG 1.6 kg·ha-1 + Fusilade Forte 150 EC 2.5 dm3·ha-1 + adjuvant Atpolan 80 EC 1.5 dm3·ha-1 (mixture), 5. Barox 460 SL 3.0 dm3·ha-1, 6. Barox 460 SL 3.0 dm3·ha-1 + Fusilade Forte 150 EC 2.5 dm3·ha-1 (mixture), 7. Barox 460 SL 3.0 dm3·ha-1 + Fusilade Forte 150 EC 2.5 dm3·ha-1 + adjuvant Atpolan 80 EC 1.5 dm3·ha-1 (mixture). In treatments 2–7, pre-emergence mechanical weed control was done. The herbicides were applied immediately before potato emergence (treatments 2, 3, 4) and after emergence, when the plants were 10–15 cm high (treatments 5, 6, 7). The proportion of weeds destroyed before closing of potato rows differed depending on the method of weed control, and ranged from 41.1% to 83.5%. The highest effectiveness was provided by treatments 3 (Plateen 41.5 WG 2.0 kg·ha-1 + Fusilade Forte 150 EC 2.5 dm3·ha-1) and 4 (Plateen 41.5 WG 1.6 kg·ha-1 + Fusilade Forte 150 EC 2.5 dm3·ha-1 + adjuvant Atpolan 80 EC 1.5 dm3·ha-1), performed with the use of herbicide mixtures and adjuvant-supplemented mixtures.


Keywords:

yield, weed control effectiveness, weed control methods, weed fresh matter, soil tillage

Adamiak J., Zawiślak K., Janczak D. 1982. Wpływ sposobów pielęgnacji na właściwości fizyczne gleby, zachwaszczenie i plonowanie ziemniaka. Zesz. Nauk. ART w Olsztynie, Rol. 33: 65 — 75.
Google Scholar

Bac S., Koźmiński Cz., Rojek M. 1998. Agrometeorologia. Wyd. PWN, Warszawa: 274 s.
Google Scholar

Boligłowa E., Gleń K. 2003. Yielding and quality of potato tubers depending on the kind of organic fertilization and tillage method. Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities, S. Agronomy, Vol. 6, Issue 1. www.ejpau.media.pl/sereis/volu mne6/issue/agronomy/art-03.html.
Google Scholar

Ciuberkis S., Bernotas S., Raudonius S., Felix J. 2007. Effect of weed emergence time and intervals of weed and crop competition on potato yield. Weed Technology 21 (1): 213 — 218.
Google Scholar

Deryło. S., Szymankiewicz K. 2003. Plonowanie i zachwaszczenie ziemniaka w warunkach zróżnicowanego poziomu agrotechniki na glebie lekkiej. Annales UMCS, Sec. E, 58: 247 — 255.
Google Scholar

Enerlein C. V., Petersom P. E., Guttieri M. J., Stark J. C. 1997. Efficacy and economics of cultivation weed control in potato. Weed Technology 11 (2): 257 — 264.
Google Scholar

Giebel J., Wnękowski S., Słomińska R., Dziedzic M. 1992. Effect of Sencor (metribuzin) on the inoculum activity of potato gangrene (Phoma exiqua var. foreata). Materiały 32. Sesji Nauk. Inst. Ochr. Roślin, Cz. II.: 28 — 32.
Google Scholar

Gruczek T. 2001 a: System pielęgnowania ziemniaka a jakość plonu. Fragm. Agronom., 2 (70): 37 — 50.
Google Scholar

Gruczek T. 2001 b: Efektywne sposoby walki z chwastami i ich wpływ na jakość bulw ziemniaka. Biul. IHAR 217: 221 — 231.
Google Scholar

Gruczek T. 2004. Chemiczne i mechaniczne zwalczanie chwastów w ziemniakach oraz wpływ na jakość plonu. Prog. Plant Protection /Post. Ochr. Roślin, 44 (2): 715 — 717.
Google Scholar

Gruczek T. 2005. Wykorzystanie herbicydu Roundup 360 SL w pielęgnowaniu ziemniaka. Prog. Plant Protection /Post. Ochr. Roślin, 45 (2) : 697 — 700.
Google Scholar

Gruczek T., Pastusiak A. 1999. Efektywne sposoby walki z chwastami i ich wpływ na jakość produkowanych bulw. Mat. Konf. Nauk. nt. Ziemniak jadalny i dla przetwórstwa spożywczego — czynniki agrotechniczne i przechowalnicze warunkujące jakość. Radzików, 23–25 luty: 72 — 75.
Google Scholar

Gugała M., Zarzecka K. 2006. Efektywność ekonomiczna ochrony ziemniaka przed chwastami. Mat. IV Konf. Nauk. nt. „Ziemniak spożywczy i przemysłowy oraz jego przetwarzanie”. Szklarska Poręba, 8–11 maja: 169 — 170.
Google Scholar

Pytlarz-Kozicka M. 2002. Wpływ sposobów pielęgnowania na wysokość i jakość plonów ziemniaka. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 489: 147 — 155.
Google Scholar

Renner K. A. 1998. Weed control in potato with rimsulfuron and metibuzin. Weed Technol. 12, (2): 406 — 409.
Google Scholar

Rola H., Rola J. 2001. Pozytywne i negatywne stosowanie herbicydów w uprawach rolniczych w Polsce w latach 1950–2000. Prog. Plant Protection /Post. Ochr. Roślin, 41 (1): 47 — 57.
Google Scholar

Rymaszewski J., Sobiech S., Więckowski A. 1996. Przydatność herbicydów i ich mieszanek do przed i powschodowego zwalczania chwastów w ziemniakach. Prog. Plant Protection/ Post. Ochr. Roślin, 36 (2): 314 — 316.
Google Scholar

Sawicka B., Skalski J. 1996. Zachwaszczenie ziemniaka w warunkach stosowania herbicydu Sencor 70 WP. Cz. I. Skuteczność chwastobójcza herbicydu. Rocz. Nauk Rol. 112-A-1–2: 169 — 182.
Google Scholar

Sekutowski T., Rola H. 2006. Oddziaływanie różnych systemów uprawy i zabiegów herbicydowych na zapas diaspor chwastów w glebie. Mat. XLVI Sesji Nauk. Inst. Ochr. Roślin. Streszczenia, Poznań, 16–17 luty: 304 — 305.
Google Scholar

Wilson D. E., Nissan S. J., Thompson A. 2002. Potato (Solanum tuberosum) variety and weed response to sulfentrazone and flumioxazin. Weed Technology 16 (3): 567 — 574.
Google Scholar

Zarzecka K. 2002. Ekonomiczna ocena ochrony ziemniaka przed chwastami. Zesz. Nauk. AP Siedlce, Rol., 61: 40 — 48.
Google Scholar

Zarzecka K. 2004. Ocena różnych sposobów odchwaszczania ziemniaka. Cz. II. Zależność pomiędzy zachwaszczeniem a plonowaniem. Acta Sci. Pol., Agricultura, 3 (2): 195 — 202.
Google Scholar


Published
2009-03-31

Cited by

Gugała, M. and Zarzecka, K. (2009) “Evaluation the effectiveness of herbicides in potato cultivation”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (251), pp. 225–234. doi: 10.37317/biul-2009-0097.

Authors

Marek Gugała 
marek.gugala@uph.edu.pl
Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Podlaska, Siedlce Poland

Authors

Krystyna Zarzecka 

Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Podlaska, Siedlce Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 34
PDF downloads: 43


License

Copyright (c) 2009 Marek Gugała, Krystyna Zarzecka

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>