An examination of diversity and interrelationships among traits in a winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm collection by multivariate methods. Part I. Phenotypic and genotypic correlations

Krzysztof Ukalski

krzysztof_ukalski@sggw.edu.pl
Katedra Biometrii, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego, Warszawa (Poland)

Joanna Ukalska


Katedra Biometrii, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego, Warszawa (Poland)

Tadeusz Śmiałowski


Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin, Zakład Roślin Zbożowych w Krakowie (Poland)

Wiesław Mądry


Katedra Doświadczalnictwa i Bioinformatyki, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego, Warszawa (Poland)

Abstract

A phenotypic variation and interrelationships between 51 genotypes (cultivars and clones) from the winter wheat working collection maintained at the Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, Department of Cereal Crops in Cracow, were assessed. Yield structure traits and susceptibility to the most important winter wheat diseases were evaluated during 4-year investigations carried out in the years 1999 to 2002. The input data were arranged in an incomplete two-way genotype × year classification. Variance components were estimated separately for each trait by REML method for a random model of the two-way classification. Coefficients of heritability for the four-year phenotypic means were estimated on the basis of variance components. Genotypic and phenotypic correlation coefficients and their standard errors were estimated. The VARCOMP procedure and Multivariate REML option of MIXED procedure of the SAS package were used for all computing. The genotypic variance components and variance components of the year effects appeared to be significant for the examined traits. The repeatability coefficients were higher than 0.7 for all the traits except a falling number. The pairs of traits which were correlated at the phenotypic level were also correlated at the genotypic one. The absolute values for genotypic correlation coefficients were mostly much higher than those for the phenotypic ones.


Keywords:

genotypic correlations, germplasm, multivariate analysis of variance, phenotypic correlations, winter wheat

Becker W. A. 1984. Quantitative genetics. Washington State University Press, Seattle, Washington.
Google Scholar

Bichoński A. 1995. Ocena wybranych cech technologicznych z kolekcji pszenicy ozimej. Biul. IHAR 194: 131 — 138.
Google Scholar

Falconer D.S., Mackay T. F. C. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th. ed. Longman, Essex, England.
Google Scholar

Hebert D. 1994. Genetic, phenotypic, and environmental correlations in black medic, Medicago lupulina L., grown in three different environments. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88: 604 — 613.
Google Scholar

Holland J. B. 2006. Estimating genotypic correlations and their standard errors using multivariate restricted maximum likelihood estimation with SAS Proc MIXED. Crop Sci. 46: 642 — 654.
Google Scholar

Khattree R., Naik D.N. 2000. Multivariate data reduction and discrimination with SAS software. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
Google Scholar

Littell R. C., Milliken G.A., Stroup W. W., Wolfinger R. D. 1996. SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
Google Scholar

Magorokosho C. 2006. Genetic diversity and performance of maize varieties from Zimbabwe, Zambia and Malawi. Rozprawa doktorska, Texas A&M University.
Google Scholar

Mazurkiewicz B., Struś M. 1997. Kolekcje robocze pszenicy ozimej jako czynnik postępu hodowlanego. Biul. IHAR 204: 81 — 87.
Google Scholar

Mądry W. 1993. Studia statystyczne nad wielowymiarową oceną zróżnicowania cech ilościowych w kolekcjach zasobów genowych zbóż. Monografie i rozprawy, Wydawnictwo SGGW, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Moghaddam M., Ehdaie B., Waines J. G. 1997. Genetic variation and interrelationships of agronomic characters in landraces of bread wheat from southeastern Iran. Euphytica 95: 361 — 369.
Google Scholar

Muszyński S., Mądry W., Tomaszewski M., Sowa A., Zimny. J. 2000. Genetyka dla rolników. Fundacja „Rozwój SGGW”, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Sardana S., Mahajan R. K., Gautam N. K., Ram B. 2007. Genetic variability in pea (Pisum sativum L.) germplasm for utilization. SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics 39 (1): 31 — 41.
Google Scholar

SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 8.2. 2002. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
Google Scholar

Scheinberg E. 1966. The sampling variance of the correlation coefficients estimated in genetic experiments. Biometrics 22: 187 — 191.
Google Scholar

Searle S. R. 1961. Phenotypic, genotypic and environmental correlations. Biometrics 17: 474 — 480.
Google Scholar

Seber G. A. F. 1984. Multivariate observations. J. Wiley & Sons, New York.
Google Scholar

Śmiałowski T., Nita Z., Witkowski E. 2006.Ocena współzależności cech pszenicy ozimej na podstawie analizy ścieżek. Biul. IHAR 240/241: 43 — 50.
Google Scholar

Śmiałowski T. Stachowicz M. 2007. Ocena wartości technologicznej nowych rodów pszenicy badanych w doświadczeniach wstępnych w latach 2005–2006. Biul. IHAR 245: 57 — 66.
Google Scholar

Śmiałowski T. 2004. Ocena rodów pszenicy ozimej z polskiej hodowli w doświadczeniach przed rejestrowych w roku 2004. Biul. IHAR 235: 13 — 22.
Google Scholar

Węgrzyn S. 1989. Możliwości wykorzystania genetyki ilościowej w hodowli roślin. Biul. IHAR 171/172: 135 — 142.
Google Scholar

Węgrzyn S., Wojas T., Śmiałowski T. 2001. Evaluation of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genetic recourses from the collection of the Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute in the years 1994–1999. Broad Variation and Precise Characterization — Limitation for the Future. EUCARPIA 2001. Poznań. 294 — 296.
Google Scholar

Wojas T., Gut M. 2001.Współzależność pomiędzy odpornością na porastanie a innym cechami użytkowymi pszenicy ozimej (Triticum aestivum L.). Biul. IHAR 223: 87 — 95.
Google Scholar


Published
2008-09-30

Cited by

Ukalski, K. (2008) “An examination of diversity and interrelationships among traits in a winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm collection by multivariate methods. Part I. Phenotypic and genotypic correlations”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (249), pp. 35–43. doi: 10.37317/biul-2008-0031.

Authors

Krzysztof Ukalski 
krzysztof_ukalski@sggw.edu.pl
Katedra Biometrii, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego, Warszawa Poland

Authors

Joanna Ukalska 

Katedra Biometrii, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego, Warszawa Poland

Authors

Tadeusz Śmiałowski 

Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin, Zakład Roślin Zbożowych w Krakowie Poland

Authors

Wiesław Mądry 

Katedra Doświadczalnictwa i Bioinformatyki, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego, Warszawa Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 411
PDF downloads: 23


License

Copyright (c) 2008 Krzysztof Ukalski, Joanna Ukalska, Tadeusz Śmiałowski, Wiesław Mądry

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5