Reaction of some winter wheat cultivars to phenylurea and sulfonylurea herbicides
Renata Kieloch
iung@iung.pulawy.plInstytut Uprawy Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa — Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Zakład Herbologii i Technik Uprawy Roli, Wrocław (Poland)
Henryk Rola
Instytut Uprawy Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa — Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Zakład Herbologii i Technik Uprawy Roli, Wrocław (Poland)
Abstract
The field experiments were carried out in the years 2004–2006 to evaluate the reaction of six winter wheat cultivars: Sukces, Tonacja, Kobiera, Kobra, Trend and Finezja to phenylurea (Dicuran 80 WP, Arelon Dyspersyjny 500 SC) and sulfonylurea (Glean 75 WG, Atlantis 04 WG) herbicides. Wheat plants were treated with the herbicides in autumn, when they were at the stage of two leaves. The treatment with herbicides did not cause any damages to the wheat plants. No significant effect of the herbicides on the yield of grain was observed. The selectivity of herbicides was affected by weather conditions during the growing season. Negative effects of the herbicides Dicuran 80 WP, Arelon Dyspersyjny 500 SC and Glean 75 WG upon the wheat plants appeared when weather conditions were unfavourable for their development (cold and rainy spring and summer).
Keywords:
cultivars, herbicides, weather conditions, winter wheat, yieldReferences
Adamczewski K., Urban M. 2000. Reakcja 7 odmian pszenicy ozimej na dwie formy użytkowe chlorotoluronu. Prog. Plant Protection /Post. Ochr. Roślin 40 (1): 374 — 379.
Google Scholar
Brar L.S., Walia U.S. 1992. Tolerance of wheat cultivars to herbicides. J. Res. Punjab Agric. Univ. 29 (2): 182 — 186.
Google Scholar
Cabanne F., Snape J.W. 1985. A similar metabolism of chlorotoluron in cell suspension cultures from near-isogenic susceptible and tolerant lines of wheat. Pestic-biochem-physiol., Orlando, Fla. Academic Press, Vol. 47 (1): 51 — 59.
Google Scholar
Dastgheib F., Field R. J., Namjou S. 1993. The mechanism of differential response of wheat cultivars to chlorsulfuron. Weed Research, Vol. 33: 299 — 308.
Google Scholar
Gabińska K., Rola J. 1985. Reakcja odmian pszenicy ozimej na herbicydy. Pam. Puł., 84: 103 — 120.
Google Scholar
Gabińska K. 1986. Tolerancja odmian pszenicy ozimej na herbicydy. Mat. XXVI Sesji Nauk. Inst. Ochr. Rośl., Cz. II — Postery: 47 — 53.
Google Scholar
McMullan P. M. 1994. The influence of temperature on barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) tolerance to diclofop-methyl or fenoxaprop-P-ethyl mixtures. Weed Research 34: 23 — 28.
Google Scholar
Nowicka B. 1993. Wpływ herbicydów na wysokość i jakość plonu odmian pszenicy ozimej. IUNG, Puławy, R (302): 1 — 47.
Google Scholar
Nowicka B., Rola H. 1997. Oddziaływanie herbicydów na wybrane odmiany pszenicy ozimej. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin 37(2): 254 — 256.
Google Scholar
Orr J. P., Canevari M., Jackson L., Wennimg R., Carner R., Nishimoto G. 1996. Post-emergence herbicides and application time affect wheat yields. California — Agriculture 50 (4): 32 — 36.
Google Scholar
Rola H., Domaradzki K., Kieloch R. 1999.Tolerancja wybranych odmian pszenicy na herbicydy. Pam. Puł. 114: 305 — 311.
Google Scholar
Rola H., Domaradzki K., Kieloch R. 2000. Wpływ herbicydów na plonowanie odmian pszenicy ozimej. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin 40 (1): 380 — 386.
Google Scholar
Rola H., Kieloch R. 2001. Wpływ herbicydu Affinity 50,75 WG na rozwój i plonowanie wybranych odmian pszenicy ozimej. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin, vol. 41(2): 882 — 884.
Google Scholar
Rola H., Kieloch R. 2002. Tolerancja odmian pszenicy ozimej na Dicuran 80 WP. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin vol. 40 (2): 581 — 583.
Google Scholar
Rola H., Kieloch R., Rola J. 2004. Reakcja odmian pszenicy ozimej na herbicydy w świetle badań prowadzonych w rejonie Dolnego Śląska w latach 1971–2002. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin 44 (1): 331 — 338.
Google Scholar
Rola H., Kieloch R. 2006. Reakcja odmian pszenicy ozimej na chlorosulfuron stosowany jesienią oraz wiosną. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin 46 (2): 261 — 264.
Google Scholar
Urban M. 2002. Biologiczna ocena herbicydów w odmianach pszenicy ozimej. Progress in Plant Protection, Vol. 42, No. 2: 526 — 529.
Google Scholar
Authors
Renata Kielochiung@iung.pulawy.pl
Instytut Uprawy Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa — Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Zakład Herbologii i Technik Uprawy Roli, Wrocław Poland
Authors
Henryk RolaInstytut Uprawy Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa — Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Zakład Herbologii i Technik Uprawy Roli, Wrocław Poland
Statistics
Abstract views: 49PDF downloads: 21
License
Copyright (c) 2007 Renata Kieloch, Henryk Rola
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:
- Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
- Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
- Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
- Including the article in a collective work.
- Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
- Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
- Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.
Authors by sending a request for publication:
- They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
- They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
- They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
- They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
- They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Renata Kieloch, Krzysztof Domaradzki, The influence of sowing rates of winter wheat on herbicides efficacy in cultivars Kobra and Tonacja , Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: No. 253 (2009): Regular issue
