Influence of compost produced from municipal solid wastes and of nitrogen fertilization on yields and technological quality of sugar beet

Part I. Yields of roots and technological quality of sugar beet

Renata Gaj

agro@up.poznan.pl
Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu (Poland)

Dariusz Górski


Instytut Ochrony Roślin w Poznaniu, Terenowa Stacja Doświadczalna w Toruniu (Poland)

Abstract

The objective of the study was to assess the effect of different rates of compost and nitrogen on yield and technological quality of sugar beet roots. Four field experiments were carried out in split-plot design in three replications in 2001–2002. The following experimental factors were evaluated: (I) compost rate: 0, 10, 20, 40 t·ha-1, (II) nitrogen rate: 0, 90, 150 kg·ha-1. Yields of sugar beet roots were high and ranged from 68.7 t·ha-1 to 91 t·ha-1. The effect of the experimental factors on yield was dependent on agricultural environment. Compost and nitrogen fertilization did not have significant influence on sugar beet roots in 2001, when experiments were carried out on light textured soil as well as in 2002, when sugar beet was cultivated on heavy textured soil. No significant effects of compost and nitrogen fertilization on technological yield of sugar were found. Sugar content of roots depended on the level of nitrogen fertilization, whereas compost rates did not influence either this parameter or content of molasses in roots.

 

Keywords:

MSW composts, sugar beet, yield

Anonim. 1995. Die Qualität der Zuckerrüben. KWS Verlag, Einbeck: 10 — 23.
Google Scholar

Bell Ch., Milford G. F. J., Allen L. R. 1996. Sugar beet, photo-assimilate distribution in plants and crops. Eds. E. Zaruski A. A. Schaffer, New York, Marcel Decker Inc.: 691 — 703.
Google Scholar

Burgdorf W. 2000. Humusgehalt und Humusbilanz auf Zuckerrübenstandorten, Zuckerrübe 49. Jg. (5): 262 — 263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026635540001800211
Google Scholar

Ehrig C. Bode-Meyer A., Stahr K. 1987. Heavy metal uptake by plants from waste compost. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Bodenkulturen Gesellschaft 55: 589 — 594.
Google Scholar

Engels T. 1993. Nitratauswaschung aus Getreide — und Zuckerrübenflächen bei unterschiedlichem N – Angebot, Dissertation dem Fachbereich Gartenbau der Universität Hannover zur Erlangung des Akademischen Grades Eines: 95 — 148.
Google Scholar

Gutmański I. 1996. Niskonakładowa technologia produkcji buraka cukrowego, IHAR, Bydgoszcz:15 — 50.
Google Scholar

Hansen P. 1994. Natrium und Stickstoff. Zuckerrüben. 43. Jg. (2): 123 — 124.
Google Scholar

Herlihy M. 1992. Effects of N, P and K on yield and quality of sugar beet. Irish J. Agric. Food Res. 31: 35 — 49.
Google Scholar

Johanson E. Sunnas C. 1995. Management of household waste in the Great Mazurian Lakes Region, Poland. Master of Science Thesis. Thesis Report Series 1995. Royal Institute of Technology 143.
Google Scholar

Konys L., Wiśniewski P. 1991. Analiza ścieżkowa w układach przyczynowo-skutkowych, Roczniki AR w Poznaniu CLIII: 37 — 45.
Google Scholar

Kopczyński J. 1994. Kierunki zmian niektórych cech jakościowych korzeni buraka cukrowego pod wpływem współdziałania nawożenia organicznego i azotowego. Zesz. Nauk. AR Szczec. 172: 249 — 255.
Google Scholar

Kordas L., Zimny L.1997. Wpływ wybranych poplonów ścierniskowych na plonowanie buraka cukrowego uprawianego technologią siewu bezpośredniego, Biul. IHAR 202: 207 — 211.
Google Scholar

Kovac K. 1998. The effect of different soil cultivation and fertilization on yield, quality and uptake of nutrients in sugar beet. Rastl. Vyroba 44 2: 59 — 64.
Google Scholar

Ławiński H., Grzebisz W. 2000. Ocena wpływu systemu uprawy i dawek azotu na plon i jakość technologiczną buraka cukrowego. Folia Univ. Agric. Stetin 211, Agricultura 84: 251 — 256.
Google Scholar

Mazur K., Ciećko Z. 2000. Nawożenie organiczne w zintegrowanym rolnictwie, Folia Univ. Agric. Stetin. 211 Agricultura (84): 285 — 288.
Google Scholar

Mazur T., Mineew M. V., Debreczeni B. 1993. Nawożenie w rolnictwie biologicznym. Wydaw. ART. Olsztyn: 26 — 35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414093026001008
Google Scholar

Rocznik Statystyczny. 2001; 2002. Wydaw. Statystyczne GUS, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Rother B. 1998. Die technische Qualität der Zuckerrüben unter dem Einfluss verschiedener Anbaufaktoren, 1 Auf. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag: 15 — 45.
Google Scholar

Trętowski J, Wójcik A. R. 1988. Metodyka doświadczeń rolniczych. WSRP, Siedlce.
Google Scholar

Wallace A., Wallace G. A. 1990. Interactions between polymer soil conditioners and organic amendments in the improvement of physical properties of soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition 13: 437 — 450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169009364089
Google Scholar

Welte E., Szabolcs I. 1987. Organic fertilizers for improvement and maintenance of soil fertility. Reprints from 4th International Symposium Agricultural Waste Management and Environmental Protection, 11–14 May, Braunschweig, Fed. Rep. of Germany: 129 — 140.
Google Scholar

Rynek cukru. 2002. Instytut Ekonomiki Rolnictwa i Gospodarki Żywnościowej, Warszawa.
Google Scholar


Published
2004-12-31

Cited by

Gaj, R. and Górski, D. (2004) “Influence of compost produced from municipal solid wastes and of nitrogen fertilization on yields and technological quality of sugar beet: Part I. Yields of roots and technological quality of sugar beet”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (234), pp. 145–154. doi: 10.37317/biul-2004-0018.

Authors

Renata Gaj 
agro@up.poznan.pl
Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu Poland

Authors

Dariusz Górski 

Instytut Ochrony Roślin w Poznaniu, Terenowa Stacja Doświadczalna w Toruniu Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 64
PDF downloads: 35


License

Copyright (c) 2004 Renata Gaj, Dariusz Górski

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.