The effect of different levels of soil moisture on development and yielding of two different genotypes of white lupine (Lupinus albus L.)

Janusz Podleśny

iung@iung.pulawy.pl
Zakład Uprawy Roślin Pastewnych, Instytut Uprawy Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa w Puławach (Poland)

Anna Podleśna


Zakład Żywienia Roślin i Nawożenia, Instytut Uprawy Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa w Puławach (Poland)

Abstract

The study was conducted in climatic chambers at the Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation in Puławy. The experimental design included two factors: two morphologically different varieties of white lupine: Bardo (traditional form) and Katon (determinate form), and differentiated soil moisture: 30%, 50% and 70% of field water capacity. Decreased water content of the soil strongly reduced both the development and yielding of white lupine. The lowest yield was found for var. Katon that was cultivated at the lowest soil moisture (30% of field water capacity). The highest yield was obtained with var. Bardo grown at the optimal soil moisture (70% of field water capacity). The reduction of seeds yield, found for plants grown under conditions of lower soil moisture, resulted from a lower pods density per plant as well as lower number of seeds per plant. Determinate lupine var. Katon was more susceptible to water deficit in the soil than was traditional var. Bardo.


Keywords:

drought stress, plant development, varieties, white lupine, yielding

Bunce J. A. 1988. Differential responses of photosynthesis to water stress in three soybean cultivars. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 26 (4): 415 — 420.
Google Scholar

Grzesiak S., Filek W., Grzesiak M. 1998. Wpływ stresu wodnego na wzrost korzeni różnych odmian roślin strączkowych różniących się wrażliwością na suszę. W: Ekofizjologiczne aspekty reakcji roślin na działanie abiotycznych czynników stresowych.. PAN Kraków: 63 — 68.
Google Scholar

Hoogenboom G., Peterson C. M., Huck M. G. 1987. Shoot growth rate soybean as affected by drought stress. Agronomy J. 79 (4): 598 — 607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900040003x
Google Scholar

Hurd E. A. 1974. Can we breed for drought resistance. In: Drought injury and resistance in crops. Larson K. L., Eastin J. D., (eds.). Published by Crop Science Society of America, Madison: 77 — 88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cssaspecpub2.c5
Google Scholar

Itoh R., Kumura A. 1996. Acclimation of soybean plants to water deficit. II Recovery of photosynthesis and leaf water status under prolonged water deficit. Jap. J. Crop Sci. 55 (3): 374 — 378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.55.374
Google Scholar

Jasińska Z., Kotecki A. 1993. Rośliny strączkowe. PWN, Warszawa: 97 — 99.
Google Scholar

Kotecki A. 1990. Wpływ składu gatunkowego oraz zróżnicowanego udziału komponentów w mieszankach na plon nasion peluszki uprawianej w różnych warunkach glebowych. Rozprawa habilitacyjna, AR Wrocław.
Google Scholar

Michałek S., Borowski E. 1998. Reakcja wybranych odmian soi (Glycine max L.) na suszę. Zesz. Nauk. AR w Krakowie, 57, t. 2: 905 — 908.
Google Scholar

Podleśny J. 1994. Możliwości zmniejszenia strat nasion grochu poprzez zastosowanie rośliny podporowej i różnych sposobów zbioru. R (318) IUNG Puławy.
Google Scholar

Podleśny J. 2001. The effect of drought on the development and yielding of two different varieties of the fodder broad bean (Vicia faba minor). J. Appl. Genet., 42(3): 283 — 287.
Google Scholar

Podleśny J. 2002: Growth and yields of conventional and determinate forms of white lupine. Raport IUNG (w druku).
Google Scholar

Prusiński J. 1999. Impact of plant density on the yielding of white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). In: Lupin in Polish and European Agriculture. Polskie Towarzystwo Łubinowe ATR Bydgoszcz: 106 — 110.
Google Scholar

Randall H. C., Sinclair T. R. 1988. Sensitivity of soybean leaf development to water deficits. Plant, Cell and Environment, 11 (9): 835 — 839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1988.tb01909.x
Google Scholar

Sameshima R., Sakuratani T., Takenouchi A. 1995. Relationship between transpiration rate of soybean plants (Glycine max Merr: cv. Enrei) and soil water content estimated by stem heat balance and heat probe methods. J. Agricult. Meteorology, 51 (2): 153 — 157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.51.153
Google Scholar

Sarkar R. K. 1994. Studies on some morpho-physiological characters in relation to drought tolerance in soybean. Indian J. Plant Physiology, 37 (1): 40 — 42.
Google Scholar

Szukała J., Czekała J. 1999. Dynamika wzrostu biomasy korzeni i brodawek oraz ich skład chemiczny u tradycyjnej i samokończącej odmiany łubinu białego. W: Lupin in Polish and European Agriculture. Polskie Towarzystwo Łubinowe ATR Bydgoszcz: 116 — 123.
Google Scholar

Tardieu F., Katerji N. 1991. Plant response to soil water reserve: consequences of the root system environment. Irrigation Sci. 12: 145 — 152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192286
Google Scholar


Published
2003-09-30

Cited by

Podleśny, J. and Podleśna, A. (2003) “The effect of different levels of soil moisture on development and yielding of two different genotypes of white lupine (Lupinus albus L.)”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (228), pp. 315–322. doi: 10.37317/biul-2003-0115.

Authors

Janusz Podleśny 
iung@iung.pulawy.pl
Zakład Uprawy Roślin Pastewnych, Instytut Uprawy Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa w Puławach Poland

Authors

Anna Podleśna 

Zakład Żywienia Roślin i Nawożenia, Instytut Uprawy Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa w Puławach Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 42
PDF downloads: 22


License

Copyright (c) 2003 Janusz Podleśny, Anna Podleśna

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.