Comparison of variability of measurable (continuous) characteristics of selected grass species in DUS testing

Wiesław Pilarczyk

wieslaw.pilarczyk@up.poznan.pl
Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu (Poland)

Irena Mucha


Centralny Ośrodek Badania Odmian Roślin Uprawnych, Słupia Wielka (Poland)

Abstract

Variability of measurable characteristics appearing in DUS (distinctness, uniformity and stability) trials on three species of grass was compared. The data have been derived from the assessments carried out on a number of varieties of Red fescue, Kentucky bluegrass and Perennial ryegrass species from 1998 to 2001. The characteristics concerned the stem, flag leaves and inflorescence of single plants. The variability was measured with the use of coefficient of variability. Nonparametric Friedman’s test was used for analysis of the differences. In general (independently of species), the characteristics concerning the stem were significantly less variable than those concerning the leaves. The characteristics concerning the inflorescence were of moderate variability. Significant differences caused by years were also noticed.


Keywords:

DUS testing, measured characteristics, nonparametric Friedman’s test, uniformity, variability

Bennet B. M. 1976. On an approximate test for homogeneity of coefficients of variation. In: Contributions to applied statistics (ed. W. I. Ziegler). Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel und Stuttgart: 169 — 171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-5513-6_16
Google Scholar

Bobrowski D. 1986. Probabilistyka w zastosowaniach technicznych. Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Techniczne, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Czajka S., Kaczmarek Z. 2003. O testowaniu jednorodności współczynników zmienności. Biul. IHAR 226/227, zesz. 1: 25 — 29.
Google Scholar

Friedman M. 1937. The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance, J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 32: 657 — 701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1937.10503522
Google Scholar

Hollander M., Wolfe D. A. 1973. Nonparametric methods in statistics. Willey. New York.
Google Scholar

Miller R. G. 1966. Simultaneous Statistical Inference. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Google Scholar

Mucha I., Pilarczyk W. 2001. Porównanie krajowych i zagranicznych odmian wybranych gatunków traw pod kątem ich wyrównania, Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 474: 169 — 175.
Google Scholar

TG/4/7. 1980. Guidelines for the conduct of test for distinctness, homogeneity and stability – Ryegrass. UPOV Geneva.
Google Scholar

TG/33/6. 1990. Guidelines for the conduct of test for distinctness, homogeneity and stability — Kentucky bluegrass. UPOV Geneva.
Google Scholar

TG/67/4. 1980. Guidelines for the conduct of test for distinctness, homogeneity and stability — Sheep’s fescue and Red fescue. UPOV Geneva.
Google Scholar


Published
2003-06-30

Cited by

Pilarczyk, W. and Mucha, I. (2003) “Comparison of variability of measurable (continuous) characteristics of selected grass species in DUS testing”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (226/227), pp. 565–572. doi: 10.37317/biul-2003-0186.

Authors

Wiesław Pilarczyk 
wieslaw.pilarczyk@up.poznan.pl
Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu Poland

Authors

Irena Mucha 

Centralny Ośrodek Badania Odmian Roślin Uprawnych, Słupia Wielka Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 93
PDF downloads: 15


License

Copyright (c) 2003 Wiesław Pilarczyk, Irena Mucha

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>