The effect of various ways of nitrogen fertilization and systems of weed control on the yield of sugar beet on rendzina

Joanna Kurus

dziekanat.agbioinz@up.lublin.pl
Katedra Ekologii Rolniczej, Akademia Rolnicza w Lublinie (Poland)

Elżbieta Podstawka-Chmielewska


Katedra Ekologii Rolniczej, Akademia Rolnicza w Lublinie (Poland)

Abstract

In the field experiment carried out in the years 1996–1998 on the rendzina the influence of nitrogen doses (90 and 120 kg/ha), date of their application (twice and three times) as well as three ways of weeds control on sugar beet yield was investigated. It was stated that on rendzina the optimum nitrogen dose for sugar beets was 90 kg/ha. However dividing of the nitrogen doses into three parts and its applying in different dates gives the same effect in the form of root yield as nitrogen fertilizing in two dates. Different ways of weed control, compared in the experiment turned out equally effective. Nevertheless, joint chemical and mechanical weed control resulted in a slightly higher root yield than the chemical one. The tested experimental factors had no significant effect on the technological value of sugar beet roots.


Keywords:

date of nitrogen application, nitrogen doses, sugar beet, technological value, weeds control, yield

Allison M. F., Armstrong M. J., Jaggard K. W., Todd A. D., Milford G. F. J. 1996. An analysis of the agronomic, economic and environmental effect of applying N fertilizer to sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). J. Agric. Sci., Cambridge, 127: 475 — 486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600078709
Google Scholar

Bieniaszewski T. 1996. Wpływ zróżnicowanych dawek NPK na plony buraka cukrowego i jego wartość paszową. Zesz. Nauk. AR-T w Olsztynie, 62: 63 — 75.
Google Scholar

Ceglarek F., Wrzosek T. 1988. Wpływ herbicydów na zachwaszczenie i plonowanie buraków cukrowych. Zesz. Nauk. WSR-P w Siedlcach, ser. Rol. 17: 189 — 199.
Google Scholar

Götz B. 1980. Możliwości stosowania Betanalu (R) w nowoczesnej uprawie buraków cukrowych. Gaz. Cukr. 1: 39 — 40.
Google Scholar

Gutmański I., Nowakowski M. 1994. Wpływ dawki i formy azotu na wschody, plony i jakość przetwórczą buraka cukrowego w dwóch terminach zbioru. Biul. IHAR 189: 41 — 49.
Google Scholar

Kalinowska-Zdun M., Podlaska J. 1984. Wpływ nawożenia azotem, przedsiewnej uprawy roli i nawadniania na obsadę roślin, plon i wartość technologiczną buraków cukrowych. Cz. I. Dynamika wschodów i liczba roślin przy zbiorze. Rocz. Nauk Rol., s. A, 106/1: 101 — 119.
Google Scholar

Kalinowska-Zdun M., Polubiec E., Podlaska J. 1986. Wpływ nawożenia azotem, przedsiewnej uprawy roli i nawadniania na obsadę roślin, plon i wartość technologiczną buraków cukrowych. Cz. II. Wpływ na plonowanie i jakość korzeni. Rocz. Nauk Rol., s. A, 106/2: 45 — 61.
Google Scholar

Kositorna J. 1997. Badania nad wrażliwością buraka cukrowego na herbicydy stosowane powschodowo. Biul. IHAR 202: 269 — 276.
Google Scholar

Podstawka E. 1983/1984. Studia nad deszczowaniem i nawożeniem buraków cukrowych na rędzinie. Cz. I Plony. Ann. UMCS, sec. E, vol. 38/39, 8: 89 — 103.
Google Scholar

Vlassak K., Vandergeten J. P., Vanstallen M. 1991. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer placement on yield and quality of sugar beet. 54 th Winter Congr. IIRB: 455 — 463.
Google Scholar

Wójcik S. 1994. Plonowanie i jakość technologiczna buraka cukrowego w zależności od dawki azotu i rodzaju nawozu. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 407: 71 — 75.
Google Scholar


Published
2002-06-28

Cited by

Kurus, J. and Podstawka-Chmielewska, E. (2002) “The effect of various ways of nitrogen fertilization and systems of weed control on the yield of sugar beet on rendzina”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (222), pp. 279–285. doi: 10.37317/biul-2002-0073.

Authors

Joanna Kurus 
dziekanat.agbioinz@up.lublin.pl
Katedra Ekologii Rolniczej, Akademia Rolnicza w Lublinie Poland

Authors

Elżbieta Podstawka-Chmielewska 

Katedra Ekologii Rolniczej, Akademia Rolnicza w Lublinie Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 21
PDF downloads: 13


License

Copyright (c) 2025 Joanna Kurus, Elżbieta Podstawka-Chmielewska

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.