Assessment of breeding value of selected inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.)

Janusz Rogacki

janusz.rogacki@hrsmolice.pl
Hodowla Roślin Smolice Sp. z o.o. Grupa IHAR — PIB (Poland)

Abstract

The main objective of the present study was to evaluate the breeding value of 17 (10 dent and 7 flint) inbred lines of maize based on yield performance of 70 hybrids produced according to North Carolina II design “dent × flint”. Material consisted of lines used in a breeding program 40 years ago and nowadays. Except the line F2, which have been developed in the INRA in France, other lines have been bred in Smolice. Two separate series of comparative trials were carried out: for 70 experimental hybrids and the 17 parental inbred lines in two growing seasons (2005; 2006), and three locations. It has been shown that 40-year-old elite lines have proved to be unsuitable for direct use in the currently run maize breeding program. The values per se of inbred lines are not sufficient to predict the value of quantitative traits of their hybrid offspring. The flint line S61328 obtained the highest score of breeding value, measured by general combining ability, grain yield of the line itself and its earliness per se. The breeding progress of elite inbred lines used in formulas of Smolice’s hybrid varieties registered between 1971–2006 has been estimated on 59.4 kg/year.


Keywords:

breeding progress, heterosis, hubrids yield, inbred lines, Zea mays

Adamczyk J., Cygert H., Czajczyński J. 2003. 50 lat hodowli kukurydzy mieszańcowej w Polsce — dorobek i perspektywy. Biul. IHAR 230: 423 — 431.
Google Scholar

Adamczyk J. 2005. Genetyczne podstawy hodowli kukurydzy (Zea mays L.). W: Górny A. G. (red.) Zarys genetyki zbóż. Tom 2. Pszenżyto, kukurydza i owies. wyd. IGR PAN Poznań: 279 — 310.
Google Scholar

Caliński T., Czajka S., Kaczmarek Z., Krajewski P., Siatkowski I. 1998. Metodyka statystyczna i obsługa programu SERGEN przeznaczonego do analizy serii doświadczeń odmianowych i genetyczno-hodowlanych. Podręcznik użytkownika programu SERGEN 3. Poznań 1998.
Google Scholar

Duvick D. N. 1999. Heterosis: Feeding people and protecting natural resources. In: The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. Coors J. G., Pandey S. (ed.) Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, Wisconsin: 19 — 29.
Google Scholar

Duvick D. N. 2005. The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize (Zea mays L.). Advances in Agronomy 86: 83 — 145.
Google Scholar

Eberhart S. A., Russell W. A. 1966. Stability parameters in comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6: 36 — 40.
Google Scholar

Eberhart S. A., Russell W. A. 1969. Yield and stability for a 10 line diallel of single cross and double cross maize hybrids. Crop Sci. 9: 357 — 361.
Google Scholar

Goldman I. L. 1999. Inbreeding and outbreeding in the development of a modern heterosis concept. w: The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. Coors J. G., Pandey S. (red.) Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, Wisconsin: 7 — 18.
Google Scholar

Heimann H., Janiak W., Siódmiak J. 2007. Kukurydza. W: Lista opisowa odmian. Rośliny rolnicze 2007, Słupia Wielka, 2007: 110 — 139.
Google Scholar

Hunter R. B. 1999. Heterosis for the development and promotion of the seed industry. In: The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. Coors J. G., Pandey S. (ed.) Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, Wisconsin: 305 — 311.
Google Scholar

Janick J. 1999. Exploitation of heterosis: uniformity and stability. In: The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. Coors J. G., Pandey S. (ed.) Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, Wisconsin: 319 — 333.
Google Scholar

Krajewski P., Kaczmarek Z., Czajka S. 2006. Podręcznik użytkowania programu EKSPLAN wersja 2. Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN w Poznaniu. Poznań 2006.
Google Scholar

Królikowski Z., Adamczyk J., Kurczych Z. 1994. Czterdzieści lat hodowli kukurydzy w Polsce — dorobek i perspektywy. Biul. IHAR 191: 11 — 23.
Google Scholar

Kuriata R., Kadłubiec W., Adamczyk J., Cygert H. 2003. Analiza dialleliczna mieszańców pojedynczych kukurydzy. Biul. IHAR 230: 417 — 422.
Google Scholar

Matsuoka, Y., Vigouroux Y., Goodman M. M., Sanchez J.G., Buckler G. E., Doebley J. 2002. A single domestication for maize shown by multilocus microsatellite genotyping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 6080 — 6084.
Google Scholar

Richey F. D. 1946. Hybrid vigor and corn breeding. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 38: 833 — 841.
Google Scholar

Smith O.S., Hoard K., Shaw F., Shaw R. 1999. Prediction of Single-Cross Performance. w: The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. Coors J. G., Pandey S. (ed.) Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, Wisconsin: 277 — 285.
Google Scholar

Sprague G. F. 1964. Early testing and recurrent selection. In: Gowen J. W. (ed.) Heterosis. Hafner Publ. Company, New York: 400 — 417.
Google Scholar

Troyer A. F. 2000. Temperate Corn – background, behavior, and breeding. In: Specialty Corns, Second edition. Hallauer A. R. (ed.). CRC Press LLC.: 393 — 466.
Google Scholar

Troyer A. F. 2006. Adaptedness and heterosis in corn and mule hybrids. Crop Sci. 46: 528 — 543.
Google Scholar


Published
2015-09-30

Cited by

Rogacki, J. (2015) “Assessment of breeding value of selected inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.)”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (277), pp. 61–77. doi: 10.37317/biul-2015-0011.

Authors

Janusz Rogacki 
janusz.rogacki@hrsmolice.pl
Hodowla Roślin Smolice Sp. z o.o. Grupa IHAR — PIB Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 341
PDF downloads: 52


License

Copyright (c) 2015 Janusz Rogacki

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)