Possibilities of plant protection products rotation in strategy against spreading of resistance amongst potato pests

Joanna Sobczak

sekretariat@iorpib.poznan.pl
Instytut Ochrony Roślin — Państwowy Instytut Badawczy w Poznaniu (Poland)

Abstract

There are currently 40 insecticides (19 active substances), 71 fungicides (25 active substances) and 80 herbicides (18 active substances) registered on the Polish market for the protection of potato. Active substances represent many various modes of action. The knowledge of modes of action is very useful because it is possible, that active substances from different chemical groups represent the same mode of action. That is why alternate application of plant protection products containing active substances from different chemical groups is not always an effective tool in resistance prevention. Diversity of plant protection products in respect of mode of action particularly against pests prone to resistance occurrence, like Colorado potato beetle and pathogen causing late blight, allows to rotate the preparations and prevent resistance. Herbicides rotation possibilities are satisfying except for graminicides, which have the same mode of action. Additional possibilities of plant protection products rotation are visible in insecticide group, due to the fact that in recent years plant protection products containing new active substances, with different modes of action were registered in Poland. The presence of two active substances with various modes of action in a large number of fungicides and in some insecticides and herbicides is an additional, important element of resistance prevention strategy.


Keywords:

mode of action, active substances, potato protection, resistance

Adamczewski K. 2008. Chwasty odporne na herbicydy. Owies głuchy i wyczyniec polny. Ochrona Roślin 7-8/2008. 24 — 25.
Google Scholar

Adamczewski K. 2009. Wpływ sześcioletniego stosowania herbicydów na uodpornianie się miotły zbożowej (Apera spica-venti (L.) P.B.) na preparaty sulfonylomocznikowe. Fragm. Agron. 26 (2) 2009: 7 — 15.
Google Scholar

Adamczewski K., Kierzek R. 2007. Występowanie biotypów miotły zbożowej (Apera spica-venti L.) odpornej na herbicydy sulfonylomocznikowe. Progress in Plant Protection 47 (3): 333 — 340.
Google Scholar

Arthropod Pesticide Resistance Database 2013. http://www.pesticideresistance.com/search.php (data dostępu 02.07.2013).
Google Scholar

Bayer 2013. Zarządzanie odpornością w uprawach polowych. Broszura informacyjna: 29 ss.
Google Scholar

EPPO 2003. PP 1/213(2) Resistance risk analysis. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin, 33: 37 — 63.
Google Scholar

FRAC 2011. Qol Working Group. http://www.frac.info/work/FRAC%20QoI%20Minutes%202011_Sep% 20update.pdf (data dostępu 02.07.2013).
Google Scholar

FRAC 2012. Qol Working Group. http://www.frac.info/work/FRAC%20QoI-Minutes%20of%20the% 202012%20meeting-Recommendations%20for%202013.pdf (data dostępu 02.07.2013).
Google Scholar

FRAC 2013 [I]. FRAC Code List: Fungicides sorted by mode of action (including FRAC Code numbering).
Google Scholar

http://www.frac.info/publication/anhang/FRAC%20Code%20List%202013-update%20April-2013.pdf (data dostępu 02.07.2013).
Google Scholar

FRAC 2013 [II] FRAC List of plant pathogenic organisms resistant do disease control agents.
Google Scholar

http://www.frac.info/publication/anhang/List%20of%20resistant%20plant%20pathogenic%20organisms_February%202013%20updated.pdf (data dostępu 01.07.2013).
Google Scholar

FRAC 2013 [III]. Phenylamides. http://www.frac.info/frac/work/work_phen.htm (data dostępu 02.07.2013).
Google Scholar

HRAC 2013. http://www.hracglobal.com/Publications/ClassificationofHerbicideSiteofAction.aspx (data dostępu 02.07.2013).
Google Scholar

IRAC 2013. http://www.irac-online.org/documents/moa-classification/?ext=pdf (data dostępu 02.07.2013).
Google Scholar

Kapsa J. 1992. Nasilenie występowania form grzyba Phytophthora infestans odpornych na fenyloamidy w latach 1989–1991. Materiały XXXII Sesji Naukowej Instytutu Ochrony Roślin Cz. II. Postery: 38 — 42
Google Scholar

Kapsa 2002. Zmiany w europejskich populacjach Phytophthora infestans. Biul. IHAR 223/224. 329 — 335.
Google Scholar

Ląkocy A. 1973. Teoretyczne i praktyczne aspekty odporności szkodników roślin rolniczych na pestycydy. Prace Naukowe Instytutu Ochrony Roślin, Tom XIV, Zeszyt 2, 83 ss.
Google Scholar

Ministerstwo Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Wsi. 2013. Rejestr insektycydów, herbicydów oraz fungicydów stosowanych w ochronie ziemniaka (wyszukiwarka). http://www.minrol.gov.pl/pol/Informacje-branzowe/Wyszukiwarka-srodkow-ochrony-roslin (data dostępu 02.07.2013).
Google Scholar

Sobczak J. 2012. Zmiany w dostępności substancji aktywnych w fungicydach na zapobieganie uodparniania się ważniejszych patogenów ziemniaka. Biul. IHAR 266: 251 — 260.
Google Scholar

WeedScience 2013. International Survey of herbicide resistant weeds. http://www.weedscience.org/summary /SOASummary.aspx (data dostępu 02.07.2013).
Google Scholar

Węgorek P. 2007. Historia odporności owadów na insektycydy na przykładzie stonki ziemniaczanej (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say.). ISBN 978-83-89867-80-3: 68 ss.
Google Scholar

Węgorek P., Pawińska M., Mrówczyński M., Wachowiak H,. Przybysz E. 2003. Strategia chemicznego zwalczania stonki ziemniaczanej (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say.) w Polsce. ISBN 83-916204-6-8: 28 ss.
Google Scholar

Węgorek P., Zamojska J., Mrówczyński M. 2011. Susceptibility level of the Colorado Potato Beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say.) to chlorpyrifos and acetamiprid in Poland and resistance mechanisms of the pest to chlorpyrifos. Journal of Plant Protection Research. Vol. 51, No 3: 279 — 284.
Google Scholar

Węgorek P., Ruszkowska M., Korbas M., Wachowiak K., Kierzek R. 2011. Obecny stan badań nad odpornością szkodników na insektycydy w Polsce. Progress in Plant Protection. 51 (1): 232 — 240.
Google Scholar

Zamojska J., Węgorek P., Mrówczyński M. 2010. Obecny poziom odporności na insektycydy dla wybranych gatunków owadów w Polsce. Prog. Plant Prot./Post. Ochr. Roślin, 2010; 50 (3): 1205 — 1212.
Google Scholar

Zamojska J., Węgorek P., Mrówczyński M. 2011. Susceptibility level of the colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) to chlorpyrifos And acetamiprid in poland and resistance Mechanisms of the pest to chlorpyrifos. Journal of Plant Protection Research. Vol. 51, No 3 (2011): 279 — 284.
Google Scholar

Zamojska J., Węgorek P., Mrówczyński M. 2011. Changes in the Colorado Potato Beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say.) susceptibility level to pyrethroids and the pest resistance mechanisms to deltamethrin. Journal of Plant Protection Research. Vol. 51, No 3 (2011): 294 — 299.
Google Scholar


Published
2013-09-30

Cited by

Sobczak, J. (2013) “Possibilities of plant protection products rotation in strategy against spreading of resistance amongst potato pests”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (269), pp. 87–100. doi: 10.37317/biul-2013-0020.

Authors

Joanna Sobczak 
sekretariat@iorpib.poznan.pl
Instytut Ochrony Roślin — Państwowy Instytut Badawczy w Poznaniu Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 152
PDF downloads: 51


License

Copyright (c) 2013 Joanna Sobczak

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.