Effect of some insecticides on potato yield and yield characteristics
Marek Gugała
marek.gugala@uph.edu.plKatedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5048-3432
Krystyna Zarzecka
Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7792-6448
Abstract
The results reported in this work come from a field experiment carried out at the University of Podlasie Experimental Station in Zawady in the years 2004-2006. The experimental design was split-plot with three replications. The following factors were examined in the study: factor 1 — potato varieties: Wiking, Mors and Żagiel; factor 2 — insecticides applied to combat Colorado potato beetle: control (without insecticides), Actara 25 WG at the rate of 0.08 kg·ha-1, Regent 200 SC at the rate of 0.1 dm3·ha-1, Calypso 480 SC at the rate of 0.05 dm3·ha-1, Calypso 480 SC at the rate of 0.075 dm3·ha-1, and Calypso 480 SC at the rate of 0.1 dm3·ha-1. The objective of the study was to determine the effect of the insecticides applied to control Colorado potato beetle on tuber yield and structure. Tuber weight per plant is a very important characteristic because it conditions potato performance per unit area. The methods of Colorado potato beetle control significantly influenced tuber weight per plant. The highest weight of tubers per plant was recorded in the treatment where Calypso 480 SC had been applied at the rates of 0.075 and 0.1 dm3·ha-1. In contrast, the lowest weight was stated in the control. Varieties also significantly affected values of the potato yield per plant. The highest weight was recorded for Mors (on average 683.4 g) whereas the lowest one was determined for Żagiel (535.7 g). The statistical calculation did not show significant influences of ways of fighting the potato beetle as well as the cultivars on number of tubers under one plant. However, the largest number of tubers per plant was recorded for the objects 1. (control object) and 2. (Actara 25 WG in dose 0,08 kg·ha-1), and the smallest number from object 6. (Calypso 480 SC in dose 0,1 dm3·ha-1).
Keywords:
insecticides, cultivars, number of tubers, tuber weight, total yield, average tuber weight, potatoReferences
Bac S., Koźmiński Cz., Rojek M. 1998. Agrometeorologia. Wyd. PWN, Warszawa: 274.
Google Scholar
Gugała M., Zarzecka K., Artych P. 2009. Wpływ insektycydów na plon bulw ziemniaka i jego strukturę. Biul. IHAR 251: 215 — 223.
Google Scholar
Kalbarczyk R. 2004. Czynniki agrometeorologiczne a plony ziemniaka w różnych rejonach Polski. Acta Agroph. 4 (2): 339 — 350.
Google Scholar
Kapsa J., Pawińska M., Osowski J., Gawlińska H., Urbanowicz J., Erlichowski T. 1999. Kompleksowa ochrona plantacji ziemniaka jadalnego przed agrofagami. Mat. Konf. Nauk. nt. Ziemniak jadalny i dla przetwórstwa spożywczego — czynniki agrotechniczne i przechowalnicze warunkujące jakość. Radzików, 23–25 lutego: 76 — 78.
Google Scholar
Kołodziejczyk M. 2000. Kształtowanie się plonu bulw łanu i pojedynczej rośliny ziemniaka jadalnego. Biul. IHAR 214: 221 — 230.
Google Scholar
Kołodziejczyk M. 2004. Wpływ nawożenia na wielkość i strukturę plonu bulw ziemniaka. Annales UMCS, Sec. E, 59, 3: 1455 — 1463.
Google Scholar
Kołodziejczyk M., Szmigiel A., Ropek D. 2009. Production effectiveness of potato protection using selected insecticides for potato beetle control (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say). Acta Sci. Pol., Agricultura 8 (4): 5 — 14.
Google Scholar
Krzysztofik B., Marks N., Baran D. 2009. Wpływ wybranych czynników agrotechnicznych na ilościowe cechy plonu bulw ziemniaka. Inż. Rol. 5 (114): 123 — 129.
Google Scholar
Nowacki W. 2007. Porównanie efektywności stosowania systemu ekologicznego i integrowanego w uprawie ziemniaka. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin, 48 (4): 1526 — 1534.
Google Scholar
Nowacki W. 2006. Straty plonu handlowego ziemniaków powodowane przez choroby i szkodniki w 2005 roku. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin 46 (1): 193 — 201.
Google Scholar
Pawińska M. 2002. Nowe perspektywy ochrony ziemniaka przed stonką ziemniaczaną. Zesz. Nauk. AR Kraków 387: 265 — 269.
Google Scholar
Pawińska M. 2010. Ochrona ziemniaków. IHAR w Radzikowie: 1 — 8.
Google Scholar
Pawińska M. 2007. System ochrony ziemniaków przed agrofagami. Fragm. Agronom. 4 (96): 82 — 91.
Google Scholar
Pytlarz-Kozicka M., Golinowska M. 2005. Efektywność ekonomiczna ochrony roślin w uprawie bardzo wczesnych odmian ziemniaka. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin 45 (1): 397 — 403.
Google Scholar
Pytlarz-Kozicka M., Golinowska M. 2006. Efektywność ekonomiczna ochrony roślin w uprawie ziemniaków z różnych grup wczesności. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin, 46 (1): 312 — 318.
Google Scholar
Starczewski J., Turska E., Czarnocki Sz., 2006: Wpływ zagęszczenia gleby spowodowanego różną liczbą przejazdów ciągnikiem i różną szerokością narzędzi na plon i jakość bulw ziemniaka. Pam. Puł. 142: 479 — 489.
Google Scholar
Tarant Sz. 2002. Analiza tendencji w produkcji ziemniaków w Polsce w latach dziewięćdziesiątych. Rocz. AR w Poznaniu, CCCXLIII: 193 — 203.
Google Scholar
Wachowiak H., Mrówczyński M. 2003. Stonka ziemniaczana i jej zwalczanie. Ochr. Roślin 6: 13 — 14.
Google Scholar
Wojciechowski W., Parylak D. 2004. Oddziaływanie przyoranego międzyplonu ścierniskowego na plonowanie ziemniaka w płodozmianach specjalistycznych. Annales UMCS, Sec. E, 59, 3: 1121 — 1121 — 1128.
Google Scholar
Zarzecka K. 2004. Calypso 480 SC — sprecyzuje twój cel. Agrotechnika, 5: 17 — 18.
Google Scholar
Zarzecka K. 2009. Rozwój produkcji ziemniaka a jego ochrona przed agrofagami. Rocz. Nauk. SERiA XI, z. 1: 475 — 478.
Google Scholar
Authors
Marek Gugałamarek.gugala@uph.edu.pl
Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5048-3432
Authors
Krystyna ZarzeckaKatedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7792-6448
Statistics
Abstract views: 65PDF downloads: 34
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Marek Gugała, Krystyna Zarzecka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:
- Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
- Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
- Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
- Including the article in a collective work.
- Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
- Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
- Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.
Authors by sending a request for publication:
- They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
- They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
- They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
- They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
- They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Krystyna Zarzecka, Marek Gugała, Effectiveness comparison of different weed control methods in cultivation of potato , Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: No. 262 (2011): Regular issue
- Marek Gugała, Krystyna Zarzecka, Comparison of the effectiveness of insecticides in controlling of Colorado potato beetle , Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: No. 246 (2007): Regular issue
- Marek Gugała, Krystyna Zarzecka, The influence of herbicides on content of dry matter, protein and starch in potato tubers , Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: No. 257/258 (2010): Regular issue
- Marek Gugała, Krystyna Zarzecka, Paweł Artych, The effects of insecticides on potato tuber yield and its structure , Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: No. 251 (2009): Regular issue
