Evaluation the effectiveness of herbicides in potato cultivation
Marek Gugała
marek.gugala@uph.edu.plKatedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Podlaska, Siedlce (Poland)
Krystyna Zarzecka
Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Podlaska, Siedlce (Poland)
Abstract
The research was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of selected herbicides and their mixtures in potato stands. A field experiment was conducted in the years 2002-2004 at the Experimental Farm in Zawady owned by the University of Podlasie, Siedlce. The experimental design was a split-plot design with three replications. The factors examined were as follows: factor I — two soil tillage methods (traditional and simplified), factor II — seven weed control methods (1. control treatment — mechanical weed control before and after potato emergence, 2. Plateen 41.5 WG 2.0 kg·ha-1, 3. Plateen 41.5 WG 2.0 kg·ha-1 + Fusilade Forte 150 EC 2.5 dm3·ha-1 (mixture), 4. Plateen 41.5 WG 1.6 kg·ha-1 + Fusilade Forte 150 EC 2.5 dm3·ha-1 + adjuvant Atpolan 80 EC 1.5 dm3·ha-1 (mixture), 5. Barox 460 SL 3.0 dm3·ha-1, 6. Barox 460 SL 3.0 dm3·ha-1 + Fusilade Forte 150 EC 2.5 dm3·ha-1 (mixture), 7. Barox 460 SL 3.0 dm3·ha-1 + Fusilade Forte 150 EC 2.5 dm3·ha-1 + adjuvant Atpolan 80 EC 1.5 dm3·ha-1 (mixture). In treatments 2–7, pre-emergence mechanical weed control was done. The herbicides were applied immediately before potato emergence (treatments 2, 3, 4) and after emergence, when the plants were 10–15 cm high (treatments 5, 6, 7). The proportion of weeds destroyed before closing of potato rows differed depending on the method of weed control, and ranged from 41.1% to 83.5%. The highest effectiveness was provided by treatments 3 (Plateen 41.5 WG 2.0 kg·ha-1 + Fusilade Forte 150 EC 2.5 dm3·ha-1) and 4 (Plateen 41.5 WG 1.6 kg·ha-1 + Fusilade Forte 150 EC 2.5 dm3·ha-1 + adjuvant Atpolan 80 EC 1.5 dm3·ha-1), performed with the use of herbicide mixtures and adjuvant-supplemented mixtures.
Keywords:
yield, weed control effectiveness, weed control methods, weed fresh matter, soil tillageReferences
Adamiak J., Zawiślak K., Janczak D. 1982. Wpływ sposobów pielęgnacji na właściwości fizyczne gleby, zachwaszczenie i plonowanie ziemniaka. Zesz. Nauk. ART w Olsztynie, Rol. 33: 65 — 75.
Google Scholar
Bac S., Koźmiński Cz., Rojek M. 1998. Agrometeorologia. Wyd. PWN, Warszawa: 274 s.
Google Scholar
Boligłowa E., Gleń K. 2003. Yielding and quality of potato tubers depending on the kind of organic fertilization and tillage method. Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities, S. Agronomy, Vol. 6, Issue 1. www.ejpau.media.pl/sereis/volu mne6/issue/agronomy/art-03.html.
Google Scholar
Ciuberkis S., Bernotas S., Raudonius S., Felix J. 2007. Effect of weed emergence time and intervals of weed and crop competition on potato yield. Weed Technology 21 (1): 213 — 218.
Google Scholar
Deryło. S., Szymankiewicz K. 2003. Plonowanie i zachwaszczenie ziemniaka w warunkach zróżnicowanego poziomu agrotechniki na glebie lekkiej. Annales UMCS, Sec. E, 58: 247 — 255.
Google Scholar
Enerlein C. V., Petersom P. E., Guttieri M. J., Stark J. C. 1997. Efficacy and economics of cultivation weed control in potato. Weed Technology 11 (2): 257 — 264.
Google Scholar
Giebel J., Wnękowski S., Słomińska R., Dziedzic M. 1992. Effect of Sencor (metribuzin) on the inoculum activity of potato gangrene (Phoma exiqua var. foreata). Materiały 32. Sesji Nauk. Inst. Ochr. Roślin, Cz. II.: 28 — 32.
Google Scholar
Gruczek T. 2001 a: System pielęgnowania ziemniaka a jakość plonu. Fragm. Agronom., 2 (70): 37 — 50.
Google Scholar
Gruczek T. 2001 b: Efektywne sposoby walki z chwastami i ich wpływ na jakość bulw ziemniaka. Biul. IHAR 217: 221 — 231.
Google Scholar
Gruczek T. 2004. Chemiczne i mechaniczne zwalczanie chwastów w ziemniakach oraz wpływ na jakość plonu. Prog. Plant Protection /Post. Ochr. Roślin, 44 (2): 715 — 717.
Google Scholar
Gruczek T. 2005. Wykorzystanie herbicydu Roundup 360 SL w pielęgnowaniu ziemniaka. Prog. Plant Protection /Post. Ochr. Roślin, 45 (2) : 697 — 700.
Google Scholar
Gruczek T., Pastusiak A. 1999. Efektywne sposoby walki z chwastami i ich wpływ na jakość produkowanych bulw. Mat. Konf. Nauk. nt. Ziemniak jadalny i dla przetwórstwa spożywczego — czynniki agrotechniczne i przechowalnicze warunkujące jakość. Radzików, 23–25 luty: 72 — 75.
Google Scholar
Gugała M., Zarzecka K. 2006. Efektywność ekonomiczna ochrony ziemniaka przed chwastami. Mat. IV Konf. Nauk. nt. „Ziemniak spożywczy i przemysłowy oraz jego przetwarzanie”. Szklarska Poręba, 8–11 maja: 169 — 170.
Google Scholar
Pytlarz-Kozicka M. 2002. Wpływ sposobów pielęgnowania na wysokość i jakość plonów ziemniaka. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 489: 147 — 155.
Google Scholar
Renner K. A. 1998. Weed control in potato with rimsulfuron and metibuzin. Weed Technol. 12, (2): 406 — 409.
Google Scholar
Rola H., Rola J. 2001. Pozytywne i negatywne stosowanie herbicydów w uprawach rolniczych w Polsce w latach 1950–2000. Prog. Plant Protection /Post. Ochr. Roślin, 41 (1): 47 — 57.
Google Scholar
Rymaszewski J., Sobiech S., Więckowski A. 1996. Przydatność herbicydów i ich mieszanek do przed i powschodowego zwalczania chwastów w ziemniakach. Prog. Plant Protection/ Post. Ochr. Roślin, 36 (2): 314 — 316.
Google Scholar
Sawicka B., Skalski J. 1996. Zachwaszczenie ziemniaka w warunkach stosowania herbicydu Sencor 70 WP. Cz. I. Skuteczność chwastobójcza herbicydu. Rocz. Nauk Rol. 112-A-1–2: 169 — 182.
Google Scholar
Sekutowski T., Rola H. 2006. Oddziaływanie różnych systemów uprawy i zabiegów herbicydowych na zapas diaspor chwastów w glebie. Mat. XLVI Sesji Nauk. Inst. Ochr. Roślin. Streszczenia, Poznań, 16–17 luty: 304 — 305.
Google Scholar
Wilson D. E., Nissan S. J., Thompson A. 2002. Potato (Solanum tuberosum) variety and weed response to sulfentrazone and flumioxazin. Weed Technology 16 (3): 567 — 574.
Google Scholar
Zarzecka K. 2002. Ekonomiczna ocena ochrony ziemniaka przed chwastami. Zesz. Nauk. AP Siedlce, Rol., 61: 40 — 48.
Google Scholar
Zarzecka K. 2004. Ocena różnych sposobów odchwaszczania ziemniaka. Cz. II. Zależność pomiędzy zachwaszczeniem a plonowaniem. Acta Sci. Pol., Agricultura, 3 (2): 195 — 202.
Google Scholar
Authors
Marek Gugałamarek.gugala@uph.edu.pl
Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Podlaska, Siedlce Poland
Authors
Krystyna ZarzeckaKatedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Podlaska, Siedlce Poland
Statistics
Abstract views: 34PDF downloads: 43
License
Copyright (c) 2009 Marek Gugała, Krystyna Zarzecka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:
- Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
- Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
- Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
- Including the article in a collective work.
- Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
- Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
- Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.
Authors by sending a request for publication:
- They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
- They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
- They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
- They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
- They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Krystyna Zarzecka, Marek Gugała, Effectiveness comparison of different weed control methods in cultivation of potato , Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: No. 262 (2011): Regular issue
- Marek Gugała, Krystyna Zarzecka, Comparison of the effectiveness of insecticides in controlling of Colorado potato beetle , Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: No. 246 (2007): Regular issue
- Marek Gugała, Krystyna Zarzecka, The influence of herbicides on content of dry matter, protein and starch in potato tubers , Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: No. 257/258 (2010): Regular issue
- Marek Gugała, Krystyna Zarzecka, Paweł Artych, The effects of insecticides on potato tuber yield and its structure , Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: No. 251 (2009): Regular issue
